[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Sad Stochastic



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE></TITLE>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2014.210" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT size=2><FONT size=3><FONT face=Arial><FONT color=#0000ff>Has anyone 
ever asked Equis to fix their stochastic oscillator?<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp; Their 
custom %K is correct but the builtin still uses the A to Z 
description,<BR>-----<BR>"The above example used a %K Slowing Period of 1-day 
(no slowing). If you use a value greater than<BR>one, you 
<STRONG></FONT></FONT><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial>average the highest-high 
and the lowest-low over the number of %K Slowing Periods 
before<BR>&nbsp;performing the division."</FONT></STRONG></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><FONT size=3><FONT color=#0000ff 
face=Arial>------</FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial>which is just plain wrong. Would be nice to 
get the correct #s.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><FONT size=3><FONT color=#0000ff 
face=Arial>&nbsp;</DIV></FONT></FONT></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2><FONT size=3><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial>Are you listening, 
Equis?</FONT></DIV></FONT></FONT>
<P><FONT size=2><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=3>Bob<BR>bjagow@xxxxxxx 
&lt;<A href="mailto:bjagow@xxxxxxx"; 
target=_blank>mailto:bjagow@xxxxxxx</A>&gt;<BR><BR></P></FONT></FONT></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Tue May 18 19:10:57 1999
Received: from listserv.equis.com (204.246.137.2)
	by mail02.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.2) with SMTP id 27868;
	Tue, 18 May 1999 21:42:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA23674
	for metastock-outgoing; Tue, 18 May 1999 19:28:12 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA23671
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 18 May 1999 19:28:09 -0600
Received: from slkcpop1.slkc.uswest.net (slkcpop2.slkc.uswest.net [206.81.128.2])
	by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA14147
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 18 May 1999 19:39:03 -0600 (MDT)
Received: (qmail 12728 invoked by alias); 19 May 1999 01:26:53 -0000
Delivered-To: fixup-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx@fixme
Received: (qmail 11935 invoked by uid 0); 19 May 1999 01:06:02 -0000
Received: from edsl142.slkc.uswest.net (HELO Nicholas) (209.181.81.142)
  by slkcpop2.slkc.uswest.net with SMTP; 19 May 1999 01:06:02 -0000
From: "Nicholas Kormanik" <nkormanik@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: MetaStock Layout Question
Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 19:06:05 -0600
Message-ID: <000301bea193$c55810a0$8e51b5d1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
In-reply-to: <37403EBC.B8D24F0C@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Importance: Normal
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: 3e4db8972cc088cc370ad777c2778681.01

Help??  I just created a layout consisting of nine templates.  I was under
the impression that I could change the security once, and all nine templates
would reflect the changed security....

It appears that the changed security is affecting the top template **only**,
and the remaining eight templates keep the existing security.

In order to have the entire layout reflecting the new security, I have to
make the change nine times for each of the myriad of stocks I'd wanted to
quickly scan.

This sucks royally.

Is this your understanding as well?  Is there something I'm not doing,
hopefully, that makes a more streamlined process possible?

Any help greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Nicholas