[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Some indicators should work....



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

<x-html><!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
Well stated, Steve!&nbsp; Bravo!
<p>All of us shouldn't have to spend our time reinventing the wheel.
<p>Larry
<br>____________
<p>Steve Karnish wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>Nicholas,
<p>Instead of asking someone who doesn't have any confidence in indicators
and
<br>&nbsp;believes:
<p>"traders spend much too much time creating indicators. None of these
<br>indicators in the long run will give you more than a 50:50 chance at
making
<br>money."
<p><font color="#FF0000">Shouldn't you concentrate on traders that have
had success with indicators</font>
<br><font color="#FF0000">and ask the them what they are using?&nbsp; Generalizations,
like the above</font>
<br><font color="#FF0000">quote, are often, rationalizations for individuals
that are incapable of</font>
<br><font color="#FF0000">applying indicators properly.</font><font color="#FF0000"></font>
<p><font color="#FF0000">Steve Karnish</font>
<br><font color="#FF0000">CCT</font>
<p>----------</blockquote>
</html>
</x-html>From ???@??? Fri Apr 23 12:51:07 1999
Received: from listserv.equis.com (204.246.137.2)
	by mail07.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.2) with SMTP id 461319
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 23 Apr 1999 15:51:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA29475
	for metastock-outgoing; Fri, 23 Apr 1999 13:04:28 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA29468
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 23 Apr 1999 13:04:24 -0600
From: wander@xxxxxxxx
Received: from ns.idca.com (root@xxxxxxxxxxx [199.76.24.20])
	by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA16654
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 23 Apr 1999 13:13:56 -0600 (MDT)
Received: [from idca.com (p076-24176.tpa5300a.idca.com [199.76.24.176]) by ns.idca.com (confCF_VERSION) with ESMTP id PAA00516 for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 23 Apr 1999 15:09:44 -0400 (EDT)]
Message-ID: <3720C366.EDD37056@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 15:00:54 -0400
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Money management
References: <E18A38CDB705D211BEDF00805FE6CF6B0177CAA1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: aaff0e48f1b8563e05423df20397dcee.02

>  None of these indicators in
> the long run will give you more than a 50:50 chance at making money.

Probably just a misunderstanding.  Unstated was "without money managment.",
which was the subject of the e-mail..   That's the way I read it anyway.   Can't
say if that's what he meant.

Regards,
Ken
--
mailto:wander@xxxxxxxx