|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Hello,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT>My new e-mail address is <FONT size=2><A
href="mailto: j.geenen@xxxxxxxxx"> j.geenen@xxxxxxxxx</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>The old address was <A
href="mailto:klpdmozo@xxxxxx";>klpdmozo@xxxxxx</A>. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Greetings, Jan Geenen</FONT></DIV></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Mon Mar 29 16:55:00 1999
Received: from listserv.equis.com (204.246.137.2)
by mail02.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.2) with SMTP id 15429
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 19:53:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id IAA20580
for metastock-outgoing; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 08:31:05 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA20577
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 08:31:02 -0700
From: divenfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Received: from mx2.freewwweb.com (mx2.freewwweb.com [216.70.64.28])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA08044
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 17:24:38 -0700 (MST)
Received: from freewwweb.com (1Cust33.tnt5.tampa.fl.da.uu.net [153.37.189.33])
by mx2.freewwweb.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA15248872
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 19:14:46 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3700171B.7DC4F374@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 19:13:15 -0500
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Weekly moving avg on Daily chart
References: <36FFAEE3.673A720D@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <001801be7a0b$abb13960$64d1fed0@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: 2ad9a857b4c49cc6a3e24443b8c292dc.01
Adam,
I created a chart w/ your indicators on it and saved it to my desktop so I'll be
sure to see it and check it out tomorrow. Thanks for the code. I guess this
means you solved the error message problem. When you posted your e-mail about
the error message, I dug up my DMTS stuff (that I never finished), hoping to
stumble across that error message or better yet a solution
<g>. I guess I get sidetracked easily because when Rajat started talking about
52 week highs and QTRly highs and such I had to have a look, and in the process
I guess I stumbled across one of Guy's acorns and fell smack dab into a new way
(for me) of looking at the holiday problem. I just compared our weekly high
code (using continuous L Catt) and they produce identical values. I checked all
they way back to 1971. Makes me feel better. :-)
In my previous e-mail I mentioned shortening the code that I sent, and the
answer (if there is one) lies in the summation function but I'll need to look at
it some more. Today, to see if it could be done, I successfully created a
weekly RSI (2) that plots on a daily chart, but before I go for a longer
lookback period RSI, I'd like to simplify things with the sum function if
possible.
BTW, I sent the original e-mail Sunday late afternoon, but it never made it to
the list. I mention that because I don't want anyone to think I'm downing beers
before noon (not lately anyway <G>), although many moons ago on a fishing trip I
did see my dad pop one open before 9:30 am. <g>
Regards,
Ken
--
mailto:divenfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Adam Hefner wrote:
> Thanks Ken for the code.
> I have also been working on Multiple time frame testing.....but my code has
> been
> developed toward the "Gann-Swing" stuff. I have attached a Word.Doc file
> with four codes. The first two calculate (on the first day of the week) the
> previous
> weeks High and Low (also corrected for holidays), the third calculates the
> Gann
> swing, and the fourth the Gann Weekly Trend.
>
> Best wishes,
> Adam Hefner.
> VonHef@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> ---------------------------------------
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <divenfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Metastock List <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, March 29, 1999 10:48 AM
> Subject: Weekly moving avg on Daily chart
>
> > Maybe it's the Corona, but I think I'm on to something...<g>
> > If I got this right, no matter what day a week started or
> > ended on, beginning with the first trading day of each week
> > these indicators accurately show the static *weekly* moving
> > average on a *daily* chart, making it possible to do multiple
> > time frame testing with weekly ma's. (Hey, it's a start..)
> > You can
> > use the weekly ma's to determine trend, and daily ma's, MACD,
> > price...whatever, to enter...all on a daily chart. Let me
> > know if you find any errors, but I think it's clean. The only
> >
> > downside is that it won't plot on the last day loaded since it
> >
> > needs to look forward one day to determine end of a week.
> > One thing I noticed in the past is that sometimes Metastock
> > will
> > carry the decimal out 3 places on one time frame and sometimes
> >
> > only two places on another time frame (at least on this
> > machine..my
> > new one's coming in about a week :-) ), resulting in an
> > occasional
> > minor (.02% ?) difference between the 50 week ma that's
> > plotted on a daily chart and a 50 period ma that's plotted on
> > a weekly chart.
> >
> > Attached are 11 zipped indicator formulae. All will begin
> > with ~~ so
> > they'll be grouped together.
> > The indicator named "~~Wkly SMA's for DAILY Chart" takes a
> > LONG time to check things out if you edit the code or rename
> > it, so be prepared. It makes 8 fmlvar calls and some are
> > quite long. It plots fine speed-wise on the charts,
> > considering the number of calcs it has to do. Also, initially
> >
> > be sure to select only 2,3,4,5,10,20,25, or 50 as the ma
> > periods, because those are the only ones I coded it for,
> > otherwise it won't plot. If anyone has a suggestion, comment,
> > or better way to do it, I'm all ears. I'd like to automate
> > some things to eliminate such lenthy code, but at the moment
> > nothing comes to mind.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ken
> > --
> > mailto:divenfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
>
> Name: WeeklyTrend.doc
> WeeklyTrend.doc Type: Microsoft Word Document (application/msword)
> Encoding: x-uuencode
|