|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I haven't seen this message posted so I'm sending it again.
Apologies if this comes through twice.
Cheers... John
Al...
I do agree on the quality of Metastock as is in 5.11 and there haven't
been enough power tools in the newer versions to motivate me to upgrade.
I'm just not interested in talking "experts" on my screen, I suppose Y2K
will do the trick as far as my upgrade needs go. It would be great to
see see some of the suggestions made a few weeks back on this list in
the next version.
Best... John
Al Taglavore wrote:
>
> John,
>
> I too am still using ver 5.11. I cannot think of any patches, and only one
> upgrade to this excellent program. I had ver 6.0, and it was one of only
> two software packages I have ever returned under a trial basis.
> (Supercharts was the other). Did we miss something?
>
> Al Taglavore
>
> ----------
> > From: John Rastutis <Johnonetoo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: Moving averages
> > Date: Monday, March 01, 1999 11:06 AM
> >
> > Malcolm...
> >
> > This is true, noticed it quite some time ago and I'm using 5.11 (talk
> > about waiting to patch!). It can be very disconcerting, it's something I
> > check for whenever I place a moving average on a chart. Of course it has
> > no affect on indicators in formulas used for system tests. I suppose
> > it's a good thing allowing for more flexibility when creating charts,
> > just need to be aware of it.
> >
> > Regards... John
> >
> > malcolm.scott@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > >
> > > After some time working with MS6.5EOD I have only just found that
> moving
> > > averages are not plotted accurately unless the scale is merged with the
> > > price scale. Does everyone else do this. I have seen nothing on this in
> > > the manual.
> > > Malcolm Scott
|