|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Bill,
Thanks for your comments. I am very enthusiastic and will remain so.
Heck, wouldn't you be excited with those kind of returns? And, taking
that a step further, wouldn't you be excited knowing that you could
consistently reproduce those kind of returns over and over?
Heck, I can hardly sleep, let along contain my enthusiasm. Again, I am
the way I am because it works for me and I trust this process. I got
your attention, didn't I? And I'm speaking to those like you willing to
risk and have the courage to break out of their old ways of doing
things.
Humility is for those who have mastered life. I'm still a long way from
that (hehe). And remember, you don't have to like me to learn from me.
Best teachers/professors I have ever had didn't care what I thought of
them. They were committed to one thing: My education.
Believe it or not Bill, I want you and anyone lese out there willing to
listen to have this knowledge and be hugely successful. Because if you
succeed, my purpose in sharing this knowledge has been realized.
Take care.
Doc
Bill Coward wrote:
>
> I agree. I have an awful lot to learn and I'd like to hear what Docteur
> has to say. I checked out the site and signed up for a trial. I was not
> thrilled about having to hand over my credit card number for the trial, but
> I swallowed hard and did it, anyway. The Terms and Conditions require them
> to be notified within the first four days of the trial if you are not
> interested in renewing for a month, or you will be billed. I've printed a
> bunch of stuff off the site, and it appears to be legitimate. But who am I
> to say! <g>
>
> Docteur, you might get a better reception on this list if you hold down the
> enthusiasm just a tad, especially when it comes to your remarkable returns,
> even if they are true. We all enjoy a modicum of humility here and there.
> By all means, continue contributing.
>
> Regards,
>
> Bill
>
> ----------
> > From: Glen Wallace <gcwallace@xxxxxxxx>
> > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: S&P 500 (was AOL, CSCO, & WMT)
> > Date: Wednesday, February 24, 1999 10:34 AM
> >
> > Bravo, Lino. Let's not blast someone simply because they are proud of
> their
> > apparently high returns and achievements. Instead, let's see if we can
> > learn from them and improve our own work. If they are willing to share,
> I
> > will always listen and keep an open mind.
> >
> > On the other hand, if I may be so bold, bravado simply for the sake of
> > stoking one's own ego (and this is *not* directed at Doc) has no place
> here.
> >
> > Challenging a person's claims is valid, but let's leave the flaming to
> AOL's
> > chatrooms, OK? I wouldn't want people to hold back their ideas for fear
> of
> > being roasted.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alessi Lino <linoaalessi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: February 24, 1999 10:04
> > Subject: Re: S&P 500
> >
> >
> > >Docteur e-mails on his successes and trading:
> > >
> > >I consider myself a serious commodity trader who has found that the
> > >information offered by the members on this list, very beneficial to my
> > >trading.
> > >Over the years, I have seen that each individual has a different method
> > >of expressing their own successes and failures.
> > >I, for one, want to hear Doc out on what methods he uses to trade just
> > >like I want to hear Guy's philosophy an application of probability to
> > >trading.
> > >This site has great contributors; and, I feel that I as an experienced
> > >trader, have the strength of conviction to make my own mind up on
> > >whether I like what is being shared.
> > >Let's hear Doc out and if his bravado and style is offensive to some -
> > >delete his e-mail; but, let each trader decide whether to review his
> > >info.
> > >Good trading to all
> > >Lino Alessi
> >
> >
> >
> >
|