[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Moaning about Shame



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Political discussions have indeed no place on the list, therefore one should
only look at this from a traders or investers point of view, eg they are in the
economical sence the right Judges(anyway). What is a country or its leadership
worth without a basic healthy fundament as its economy.

The main parent Corperation, "the USA", is as a multiple security listed on various
exchanges, eg as Indexes like the DJI,SP500 etc. and also has subsidairies,
like the US$, listed as well.

 Now, WOULD you and most importantly WHY would you trade/invest in these
securities?

The main corperation's elite part and very diversified subsidary companies only this
decade have grown from a 1990 Low level of 2350(DJI) to a latest High level of 9650
this year, and the results are a mere plus of +7300 points or a relatively +310%.
Now, not bad going as an investment!! Some of the corperations' other subsidairy
companies, singly even scored much higher results.

Another one of its subsidaires, eg the US$ company,  and much like most of the
current Internet securities, have been heavely over-rated in both price and future
growth(expectations) over the last years($in the 80tees), and naturaly it has had to
come down to the also more elswere used natural price levels. A baloon full of air
was pinned. This debacle was then mainly created and due to a non-economicaly
underlayed artist(cowboy) being appointed to run(?) the company, eg Reagan, and
this he did so uneconomicaly, with far too much lended money(=borrowed capital),
that this also nearly led this company into a naturaly, from this "whole in the wallets'
pockets" forthcoming bankruptcy.

The current company's price level reflects, however somewhat still too high, this
subsidairy's wealth and future expectations much better. This level is also much more
realistic and logical, as its current assets are now still too high financed and beloaned,
however now in a lesser drastical way, with borrowed(=weak) foreign capital, and
as this also has come down to more managable(?) levels.

Both the parent as well as its subsidairy companies are (w)healthy managed and all
have a very prosporous bright future ahead of them. Therefore, and especialy for the
long term, a from an investors point of view seen BUY recommendation is here well
in its place, eg any of the markets dips can be used to expand the portfolio.
This as longer term investors do not mind the markets to be down for a couple of
years, as long as the stock year-after-year proves that it is a true growth stock.
Traders will want to use the "up/down" currents, created by natural swings in both
the basic economical and fundamental tides, as well as in the by humans created
fears, panics and expected, but sometimes very excaturated, forecasts. 

Regards,
Ton Maas
ms-irb@xxxxxx
 
   

 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Ronald J. Russell, Jr. <ronrussell@xxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: zondag 14 februari 1999 6:21
Subject: RE: Moaning about Shame


>This I simply can't ignore.  The impeachment was never about seducing or
>being seduced.  It was and always will be about perjury and obstruction of
>justice.  There are hundreds of people rotting in federal penitentiaries for
>lying to federal grand juries.  If any of us behaved like William Jefferson
>Clinton we would surely lose our jobs and most likely end up in jail.  This
>drivel about seduction is just more of the Democrats spin control meant to
>confuse the masses.  Unfortunately for us all they were successful.
>
>I won't continue this discussion as it has no place on this list, but I
>couldn't let this go unanswered.
>Ron
>
>"Seducing or being seduced by women has never been considered an impeachable
>offense.  If it were, almost all of our presidents would/could have been
>impeached."
>
>
>