|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.71.1712.3"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Where are we at with the sun spot cycle and can
you recommend a new low bander?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT><FONT size=2>WA3YCW</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From:
</B>David Gardner <<A
href="mailto:dgard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>dgard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>To:
</B>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<<A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Date:
</B>Sunday, November 08, 1998 8:00 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>Re: Dow
Theory<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>I've been a bear since 1996. I have been wrong.
Anyone that thinks this is just a trap to lure in the unwary bulls doesn't
understand the massive liquidity flows that laugh at out 1970s and 1980s
"used to work" techniques.
<P>David Gardner M.D. Ph.D. <BR>dgard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <BR>K6LPL
</P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Mon Nov 09 05:54:48 1998
Received: from listserv.equis.com (204.246.137.2)
by mail02.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0) with SMTP id 10323
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 9 Nov 1998 00:06:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA08671
for metastock-outgoing; Sun, 8 Nov 1998 21:12:30 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA08668
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 8 Nov 1998 21:12:27 -0700
Received: from cypher.turbonet.com (cypher.turbonet.com [204.188.48.1])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id VAA02780
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 8 Nov 1998 21:27:08 -0700 (MST)
Received: from [204.188.49.16] by cypher.turbonet.com (NTMail 3.03.0017/1.aamz) with ESMTP id oa205414 for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 8 Nov 1998 20:17:47 -0800
From: "Steve Karnish" <kernish@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Dow Theory/Sunspots
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1998 20:17:35 -0800
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1162
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <04174782814634@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: a768bd3e6076b5bc62e32f5fca0dccca
Joe,
The major sunspot cycle is one that shows up every 22 years. I have posted
a few discussions about the summers of '55 and '77. I wasn't around for
the great dust bowl of '33, but intend to continue to play the grain
markets from the long side for the summer of '99. Is there a correlation
to the Dow Theory?
Steve Karnish
CCT
----------
From: joe zilaitis <jzilaiti@xxxxxxx>
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Dow Theory
Date: Sunday, November 08, 1998 7:02 PM
Where are we at with the sun spot cycle and can you recommend a new low
bander?
WA3YCW
-----Original Message-----
From: David Gardner <dgard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sunday, November 08, 1998 8:00 PM
Subject: Re: Dow Theory
I've been a bear since 1996. I have been wrong. Anyone that thinks this
is just a trap to lure in the unwary bulls doesn't understand the massive
liquidity flows that laugh at out 1970s and 1980s "used to work"
techniques.
David Gardner M.D. Ph.D.
dgard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
K6LPL
|