|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN"><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN"><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3509.100"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT color=#000000></FONT></STRONG><STRONG><FONT
color=#000000>"<FONT size=2>Its accuracy is being debated </FONT><FONT
size=2>for over a long time now"</FONT></FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT color=#000000></FONT></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT color=#000000>Because someone can drive a truck, It doesn't
mean they can drive in a Grand Prix. I blame the problems and debate on
lack of user preparations. Glad you found a program you like, close to
home.</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT color=#000000></FONT></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT color=#000000>Richard
Estes<BR>ICQ#402160</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT color=#000000></FONT></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT color=#000000></FONT></STRONG> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From:
</B>A.J. Maas <<A
href="mailto:anthmaas@xxxxxx";>anthmaas@xxxxxx</A>><BR><B>To: </B><A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A> <<A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Date:
</B>Friday, October 16, 1998 4:42 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>Re:
ELWAVE<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>You are quite right, the studying part and
so. Since reading the ELWAVE help files I can now actualy follow what
Rajesh's Mentor is</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT><FONT size=2>refering to and counting
for in his emails. </FONT><FONT size=2>It is a big unhuman system, like you
said, as to its inner complexness and fascinating it remains.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>But having programs getting as </FONT><FONT size=2>close
</FONT><FONT color=#000000 size=2>as they can get, like ELWAVE and GET for
others, but ELWAVE doing it for a mere U$245</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>can then pleasingly do it for me
</FONT><FONT color=#000000 size=2>(as well as saving on having waving
nightmares too).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT><FONT size=2>GET not being a black
box is one point up for that program. Its unhuman pricing is one point down.
Its handy tools is one point up too.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Its accuracy is being debated </FONT><FONT size=2>for over
a long time now. From then having the wrong users inputs can lead to wrong
outputs. This</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>could well be to have something </FONT><FONT size=2>to do
with this endless </FONT><FONT size=2>debating.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Remains the price tag tho, if the results are
disappointing or otherwise left unsatisfactory a whole car goes
down.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT><FONT size=2>Trying out MS and for its price-tag is
something well to be overseen.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><FONT size=2>Exact duplicating, would sure be nice if they
can, the Elliott Wave theory is not my main aim in a WAVE program, but it
has to be</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><FONT size=2>that programs base. </FONT></FONT><FONT
size=2><FONT size=2>Spinn offs can then work </FONT></FONT><FONT
size=2><FONT size=2>quite well, much like I(we) have all fiddled around with
MS standard build-in Indicators/Systems.</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><FONT size=2>ELWAVE is equiped with such a spinn-off,
based on producers 10 years of market experiences. A fully Automatic Trade
System.</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><FONT size=2></FONT></FONT><FONT size=2>And when (very)
profitable, who is then waving (greenbacks & goodbuys)?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Regards,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Ton Maas</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><A
href="mailto:Ms-IRB@xxxxxxxxx";>Ms-IRB@xxxxxxxxx</A></FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2> </FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Oorspronkelijk
bericht-----</B><BR><B>Van: </B>C. Roffey <<A
href="mailto:ancliff@xxxxxxxxxxxx";>ancliff@xxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Aan:
</B>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<<A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Datum:
</B>vrijdag 16 oktober 1998 18:39<BR><B>Onderwerp:
</B>ELWAVE<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>I have used Elliott as a back up for 30
years. It is the most frighteningly accurate and at the same time the
most frustrating analytical tool. I do not believe that there is any
programme, including GET, that accurately analyses Elliott, especially
in the Irregular corrections. Study and more study is the only way to
appreciate Elliott.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Dr Clive
Roffey</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Fri Oct 16 19:33:36 1998
Received: from 204.246.137.2 (204.246.137.2)
by mail02.rapidsite.net (RS ver 0.3) with SMTP id 3985
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 16 Oct 1998 19:41:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id GAA14632
for metastock-outgoing; Sat, 17 Oct 1998 06:18:42 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA14628
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 17 Oct 1998 06:18:40 -0600
Received: from mtiwmhc01.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc01.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.36])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA08669
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 16 Oct 1998 16:24:14 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from allenmcd ([12.75.140.178]) by mtiwmhc01.worldnet.att.net
(InterMail v03.02.03 118 118 102) with SMTP
id <19981016221432.BAES24465@xxxxxxxx>
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 16 Oct 1998 22:14:32 +0000
From: "Allen" <allenwm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: What's worse than no data? !
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 17:15:26 -0500
Message-ID: <001c01bdf952$7a1e9120$b28c4b0c@xxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
In-Reply-To: <36274461.5B97F868@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by listserv.equis.com id GAB14632
X-Loop-Detect: 1
In spite of the fact that I'm among the world's worst spellers I beat'cha..
as of today, and I can think of a word or two that starts with S that's just
as descriptive. Once you scram what will be your choice of vendor's...
Allen..
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Bill Saxon
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 1998 8:05 AM
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: What's worse than no data? !
>
>
> I simply cannot believe the number of people on this list who
> don't know how to spell.
> Correct spelling is NOT TelescaN, it is TelescaM. And I am going
> to ScraM cause they
> ain't worth a DaMn.
>
> Johnonetoo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the offer Bill, I want the symbols for all the indices
> > Reuters has. One thing about Telescan, they do list all their index
> > symbols on the web. I was expecting Reuters to have done the same.
> >
> > I'm with you on jumping from whats bad to worse and count me as a former
> > "dumpee" soon.
> >
> > It looks like I lucked out tonight as the only screwed up data I found
> > was the dow.
> >
> > Thanks... John
> >
> > Bill Saxon wrote:
> > >
> > > John, I can give you the symbols that Telescan uses but I am
> unfamiliar with
> > > Reuters. Some of them I get by an export from FastTrack. Am
> I misinterpreting
> > > what you want??
> > >
> > > AIQ has what looks like a great package on their software
> coming out that includes
> > > Track Data's service for about everything you would want
> including Fundaments and
> > > RT. Has anyone had experience with Track Data? I don't want
> to jump from the
> > > frying pan into the pot that calls the kettle black. Don't
> you just love clichés'
> > > ? I can't wait to dump TeleScan and be dumper instead of dumpee.
>
>
>
>
|