|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Brooke,
As Chick Goslin states in his recent book: Intelligent Futures Trading:
"Paper charts are more portable." I think that sums up why some of us
prefer to "dump" the charts to paper. 12-14 hours a day in front of this
screen is enough for me.
Steve Karnish
CCT
----------
> From: Brookemail@xxxxxxx
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Brooke's Charts
> Date: Friday, October 16, 1998 8:21 AM
>
> In a message dated 10/16/98 4:42:58 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
altag@xxxxxxxxxx
> writes:
>
> << Brooke,
>
> I like the eye saving background you use in your charts. Can you turn
this
> background off when printing the charts in color?
> Al Taglavore >>
>
> Al: I don't think you can, actually, though you might be able to change
the
> background in a program such as Hypersnap before you print (by inverting
black
> and white, for example). A few people have asked for white backgrounds so
the
> charts would be easier to print. I use black backgrounds by default
because
> it's easier to see all the moving averages and indicators. I relented in
some
> charts and converted them to white backgrounds before sending them to the
> Metastock list. But I was too lazy yesterday, I guess. Sorry.
>
> I can't help wondering why you'd want to print the charts. It seems like
a
> waste of paper and ink (and electricity) to me. I look at them the old-
> fashioned way -- on the computer. Why do you and others prefer to print
them
> out sometimes? I hope you're not sending my charts to the SEC. That's it
--
> you are, aren't you? Or to John Merriwether perhaps. John Murphy? The
> Beardstown Ladies? Joe Kernen? Ken Starr?
>
> Brooke
|