|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3509.100"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Harley,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT><FONT size=2>
That's a rumor that makes a lot of sense to me and you're asking for trouble by
fighting the tape. MU is in a Short Term Up Trend Channel (STUTC) and is
trying to complete a CANSLIM type cup and handle formation. it could
really jump if the rumor becomes true.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Jim</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From:
</B>Harley Meyer <<A
href="mailto:meyer@xxxxxxxxxxx";>meyer@xxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>To:
</B>Metastock list <<A
href="mailto:metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Cc:
</B>Alan Kwong <<A
href="mailto:alankwong@xxxxxxxx";>alankwong@xxxxxxxx</A>>; Joe Frabosilio
<joe6964@xxxxxxxx><BR><B>Date:
</B>Saturday, September 26, 1998 12:22 AM<BR><B>Subject: </B>Yahoo - Intel
May Take Stake In Micron Technology Inc., Reports CMP's Electronic Buyers'
News<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>I now know why MU was up so high. Rumors -
They<BR>are a pain when you have a short and the rumor<BR>takes the other
side.<BR><BR>Harley<BR><BR><A
href="http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/980925/cmp_media_2.html";>http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/980925/cmp_media_2.html</A><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sun Sep 27 23:03:35 1998
Received: from 204.246.137.2 (204.246.137.2)
by mail05.rapidsite.net (RS ver 0.3) with SMTP id 12370
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 26 Sep 1998 13:01:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA19833
for metastock-outgoing; Sun, 27 Sep 1998 00:07:03 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA19830
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 27 Sep 1998 00:07:00 -0600
Received: from cypher.turbonet.com (cypher.turbonet.com [204.188.48.1])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA18455
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 26 Sep 1998 10:10:32 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from [204.188.49.188] by cypher.turbonet.com (NTMail 3.03.0017/1.aamz) with ESMTP id ha085651 for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 26 Sep 1998 09:01:39 -0700
From: "Steve Karnish" <kernish@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Elliotscope: Your opinions PLEASE
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1998 09:02:26 -0700
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1162
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <16013930087773@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Loop-Detect: 1
Richard,
Try mouse clicking once on "reply to author" and then click
again on the desired email address (takes you directly to that
person, bypassing the list). It takes less time than writing an
email complaining about it.
Steve Karnish
CCT
----------
> From: Richard Estes <rtestes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Elliotscope: Your opinions PLEASE
> Date: Saturday, September 26, 1998 7:09 AM
>
> All, we want to hear it, now quit telling him. I would rather
be seeing
> leftist spin on Willie boy than this. the real problem with
this list is the
> difficulty to send a post directly to individual from here.
>
> Any answer, without going through a bunch of extra steps, goes
to list when
> you only wanted individual. Equis can you fix this??
>
> Richard Estes
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Eggleton <emike@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Saturday, September 26, 1998 6:29 AM
> Subject: Re: Elliotscope: Your opinions PLEASE
>
>
> >As I'm relatively new to modern day techo stuff - keep it
coming.
> >
> >Mike Eggleton
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Rajesh <rajesh@xxxxxxxx>
> >To: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Date: Friday, 25 September, 1998 1:14 PM
> >Subject: Elliotscope: Your opinions PLEASE
> >
> >
> >>Hello guys,
> >>
> >>I would like to know if its getting to heavy. Should I cut
down the
> >>posts ? Should I just post at intervals when there is a
major change or
> >>are you ll interested in the continuous updates.
> >>
> >>Since we are no Jerry Favours or the Princeton Institute of
Economics I
> >>sure would like to know.
> >>
> >>Please let me know.
> >>
> >>Dunce,
> >>
> >>Rajesh
> >>
> >
|