|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
My point exactly. Based on this, I'm definitely on the wrong side of this
move <G>. Oh well, a few more points and I'm still going to buy those OEX
puts anyway. Might as well go down in flames <ggg>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of mikelu
> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 1998 10:10 PM
> To: 'metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject: RE: Finally a Signal!
>
>
> Didn't last week's Time magazine cover ask if the bull market was over?
>
> Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guy Tann [SMTP:grtann@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 1998 3:27 PM
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Finally a Signal!
>
> Jim
>
> What scares me is the fact that all the press is getting bearish, like
> Barons, et al. What are the odds of these guys being right? Now I'm
> starting to worry.
>
> Guy
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jim Greening
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 1998 2:36 PM
> > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: Finally a Signal!
> >
> >
> > Guy,
> > I get 1057 for the top of the S&P Short Term Down Trend Channel
> > (that's close enough <G>), but really question if it will hold
> > considering that we are bouncing off the bottom of a much longer term
> > up trend channel. I We should know soon.
> >
> > Jim
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Guy Tann <grtann@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Wednesday, September 16, 1998 12:08 AM
> > Subject: RE: Finally a Signal!
> >
> >
> > >Jim
> > >
> > >I was just so excited to get a signal, any signal <G>.
> > >
> > >Haven't downloaded my numbers yet. Trying a new service (Prophet) on
> > their
> > >31 day free trial. First day, only got about half my futures. Some
> > of the
> > >symbols changed. Went back and corrected them and then tried again.
> > Still
> > >didn't download.
> > >
> > >Guess I'll contact tech support.
> > >
> > >The top of my trendline was 1054 for the S&P. Maybe it went through
> > that
> > >number. Will check after the download.
> > >
> > >Guy
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jim Greening
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 1998 3:05 PM
> > >> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >> Subject: Re: Finally a Signal!
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Guy,
> > >> Good luck on your short. I just got through looking at the
> > DJIA
> > >> and don't believe it's going to turn here. It now looks to me like
> > >> the congestion in the 8500-8600 range could be the top of the
> > trading
> > >> channel. Of course I've been wrong before and will.....<G>.
> > >>
> > >> Jim
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Guy Tann <grtann@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >> To: Metastock <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >> Date: Tuesday, September 15, 1998 12:26 AM
> > >> Subject: Finally a Signal!
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> >Jim, Steve, et al
> > >> >
> > >> >Well, we finally have a confirmation. Will be shorting either
> > >> tonight or
> > >> >market on the open, depending upon how I feel <G>.
> > >> >
> > >> >We've been out of the market so long, I probably forgot how.
> > >> >
> > >> >After looking at my chart, our potential high on this move up is
> > 1053
> > >> for
> > >> >the S&P futures (still Sep in the Continuous data feed). It hit
> > >> 1041.5
> > >> >today on its high. Pretty close. Maybe we'll get a bounce on the
> > >> open.
> > >> >Anyway, we're short, or will soon be. Remember, 1 chance in 4 of
> > >> being
> > >> >wrong <g>.
> > >> >
> > >> >Regards
> > >> >
> > >> >Guy
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
|