|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
amen to wayne
-----Original Message-----
From: Wayne Walusiak <waynewal@xxxxxxxxx>
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, September 15, 1998 12:02 PM
Subject: European view/ vs what I saw
>Dear Patrick ,
>
>> re:George Bush has one longterm mistress and other affairs.
>
>As opposed to hundreds of women alleged to have been 'had' by Mr. Clinton ?
I,
>for one, don't really care. Most of the European leaders have been alleged
to
>have had mistresses at one time or another. A different matter to lie about
it
>under oath. Still another for misconduct within the 'business' area of the
>White House. Yet another matter to cover things up once they were being
>investigated. I think Mr Nixon was to be impeached for that...until he
>resigned.
>
>re:He promised 'Read my lips, no new taxes'. Who would you rather have, a
man
>who as less than frank about a blow job or a man who lies about taxation?
>Of course, the Democrats cooperated to help the President. Seems they
demanded
>new socialist programs to bargain with Bush on items he wanted....
>
>> re:Reagan lied about Iran Contra and other matters of real importance.
>
>Perhaps, but with a Democrat majority in Congress, they were not able to
get
>an investigation that turned up anything. So I feel the point is moot, now.
>
>> re:I don't suppose he had blow jobs to lie about but he did dump his
first
>> wife
>> and was a lousy father. I know what I think is more important.
>
>Was that before or after he became president ? If many years before, I
hardly
>think it matters if he did his job - and he did.
>
>re:The Starr report is an attempt by Republican supporters to annul
Clinton's
>victories in any way they can. The media collude because they need the
story.
>What Clinton victories ? The highest tax raises in our history ? Removal of
>all attempts to maintain a balanced budget until AFTER the Republican got
>majorities in Congress, and FORCED him to balance the budget. I sat in a
hotel
>room and watched the Democrats repeal the Graham-Rudman(sp.) Act and
anything
>else that stood in their way of new 'social' programs when they first had
the
>majority in Congress after Clinton was elected.
>Clinton supported Democrat lies of 'the republicanas starving women and
>children and trying to take social security away from lod folks'?
>
>> re:Here's a prediction. When the polls start to show a backlash against
the
>> Republican Party, and they lose control of Congress, watch them distance
>> themselves from Starr faster than they backed off from the Contrick with
>> America.
>
>Perhaps too many Europeans watch the Clinton News Network (CNN)as an
indicator
>of what the American people think. Most people here joke about what a laugh
>the CNN polls are. Ted Turner & Jane Fonda - owners - are friends of the
>Clintons. There hasn't been a negative poll about anything Mr. Clinton has
>done since he became president despite any other national polls to the
>contrary.Mr. Clinton is now waiting for things to blow over. Nothing will
>happen to him for what he did because he's a democrat & a liberal - and
looks
>and sounds so very good (and sexy to the women) on TV. If Reagan, Bush, or
any
>other conservative had done 1/10th what Mr. Clinton has done - he'd be
dragged
>out of the White House by the NOW (Natioanl Organization of 'Women') and
>stoned to death.
>Sorry if this sounded a bit hot-headed...no personal insult is or was
>intended. Those of us who have listed to 6+ years of lies can't wait to see
>him leave office.
>Thank you,
>Wayne Walusiak
>
>
|