|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Jim,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT><FONT size=2>I use TC2000 and view
securities in Daily, 2 days, 3 days, 5 days, etc. since it has that ability. I
have noticed that I need to check it a couple of ways whenever I draw a
trendline and believe that it has broken the trendline as it is a bit different
whether I use a trendline based on any of the above. In addition, you are
adding a little bit different too since your trendline is based on
candlevolume. However, I agree that the zooming as such should have no
effect. Perhaps you should send your note to <A
href="mailto:support@xxxxxxxxx";>support@xxxxxxxxx</A> to assure they see
it.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Good luck on your trading tomorrow. I for one am quite
short on my portfolio but very nervous and with all the foreign markets doing so
well, I think I may be covering my shorts and see what happens.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I can always go short again later if the situation so
warrants.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Bill</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From:
</B>Jim Greening <<A
href="mailto:JimGinVA@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>JimGinVA@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>To:
</B>Metastock <<A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Date:
</B>Monday, September 07, 1998 3:18 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>Weekly Pick &
XCIT<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>All,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2> Jim DeWilder and I
have been exchanging messages for the last two days trying to get our XCIT
charts to agree. His trend line was right at the bottom of the data
and hadn't been broken yet. We tried to duplicate results and I even
erased my file and reloaded data from Quotes Plus 2 to make sure we were
working from the same data. I now think my attached chart is right,
which has a slightly lower trend line than my original chart.
The stock still broke the trend line and pulled back above, but hasn't
broken back through again. Since the other facts I mentioned are still
valid, I'm still going to open a put position tomorrow, but only 1/2 the
size that I originally intended. If you are thinking about shorting
the stock, you might want to consider playing safe and waiting for it to
trade below 24.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2> We are still trying
to get our charts to agree exactly, but I wanted to get this information out
today. I did learn two things. First, you have to be extremely
careful when you are making a trend line from two or three points that
are fairly close together then extending it to the right across a long time
span. The second is more disturbing. I made my long term trend
line by zooming in on the May96 to Aug 97 data range, changing the Y scale
max to 10 and then drew the trend line through the low points and extended
it to the right. I then hit the ZOOM reset and looked at the chart as
I gradually zoomed in to the right. The disturbing fact is that each
time I zoomed in, the trend line angle seemed to shift up or down a
little. That's very disturbing if the trend line position relative to
the stock data varies depending on how much you zoom in or out.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2> Equis Support has
anyone else complained about this. Do trend lines that the user draw
in really shift position when you zoom in and out? If so, is the
working solution to set your zoom so the beginning and ending points of the
trend line you want to act on are displayed?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>Jim</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Mon Sep 07 13:54:09 1998
Received: from 204.246.137.2 (204.246.137.2)
by mail05.rapidsite.net (RS ver 0.3) with SMTP id 3795
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 7 Sep 1998 16:39:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA29061
for metastock-outgoing; Mon, 7 Sep 1998 13:36:26 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA29056
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 7 Sep 1998 13:36:21 -0600
Received: from smtp2.mailsrvcs.net (smtp2.gte.net [207.115.153.31])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA10055
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 7 Sep 1998 13:47:04 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from gte.net (1Cust208.tnt2.tampa.fl.gt.uu.net [208.255.234.208])
by smtp2.mailsrvcs.net with ESMTP id OAA21413
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 7 Sep 1998 14:38:45 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <35F43641.4539788@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 1998 15:38:41 -0400
From: fletch <fletchmo@xxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en] (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Tick-Tock, Tick-Tock!
References: <16313394538854@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Loop-Detect: 1
steve
you think people are confused - that is an understatement - even the 30
wght op's players are confused -
one guy in s. fla is holding pat (shrt side) another on the big island
is up big time & defiantly thinking of covering any more erosion
from the late incineration friday - Both have big time commitments -
they don't shake easily !
my stategy would only server to add to the CHAOS - everybody is
watching everybody else!
Tape readers are watching Tape readers...on & on!
seems like we are on the rear deck of the titanic - all are holding
hot hands
- i'm not showing my hand - neither is anybody else !
- in the mean time titanic is loosing her battle with the sea
- who can be concerned with that ! not NOW !- this hand is too loaded
to let me walk !
Threading the Needle - the obvious is the not-so obvious &
the not-so obvious is the obvious
What a PARADOX !
guess the question is becoming - "if you Think you CAN kill-it - then
you Might get to grill-it !"
btw steve - do you think this is really a "relaxing" La-bo-ri-ous Day
????
stay-tuned !
fletch
Steve Karnish wrote:
> Fletch,
>
> Right on! Finally, some real "meat" (endomorphisms). Teddy
> would be proud. I've always said: "Given a Map T and a Sigma
> Algebra, there may be many ergodic measures. If there is only
> one ergodic measure, then T is called uniquely ergodic". It not
> as profound as Groucho or Yogi, but it's better than the Warren
> Report.
>
> Sorry I missed your call. If you give me your "long line" #
> I'll call you, or please don't be bashful about calling me back.
> I have some great stories about Teddy spanning the decades
> (this seems to be leading to a Journey to the Center of Your
> Mind).
>
> Steve Karnish
> CCT
>
> ----------
> > From: fletch <fletchmo@xxxxxxx>
> > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: Tick-Tock, Tick-Tock!
> > Date: Monday, September 07, 1998 6:55 AM
> >
> > steve
> >
> > will get the Ergodic out to you today - w/ full explanation
> >
> > fletch
> > - you have to kill-it to grill-it !! Bears &
> bulls........
> > or........... is that Bulls & bears
> >
> >
|