PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Lionel, I am a satisfied user of QP and am going to wean myself from TS
data- right now I mainly use it for intraday looks at work, and to feed AIQ.
But QP converts to Metastock, as you know, and has the terrific Virtual
Metastock capability too.
Advanced GET is going to go to QP direct read, and QP and AIQ are working
together to get an easy data interface going.
Gann Trader reads MS and maybe someday it will read QP or QP will convert
for GT.
All in all, I feel close to being ready to dump Telescan and Worden Bros in
favor of QP only.
Alton Stephens
astephen@xxxxxxxx
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Lionel Issen
> Sent: Thursday, August 13, 1998 2:33 PM
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Christian Payen
> Subject: Re: Telescan
>
>
> Guys:
>
> After the July 4th weekend snafu downloading data at less than 5% of the
> normal speed, I got completely fed up with Telescan. Following the
> recommendations on this listserver, I switched to Quotes Plus 2. Its 1/2
> the price, the data is cleaner, and I dont have to pay for
> searches (called
> scans). It seems to work well with ms. While I'm still learning
> how to use
> the program, it has interesting capabilities that might overcome
> some of the
> limitations of ms.
>
> The downside is that the hard copy manual is quite skimpy, the online help
> is good, but you have to do a bit of searching to find it all.
> The program
> consist of several independent modules, unlike ms where everything is
> accessible from the main metastock window.
>
> Lionel
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christian Payen <zoby@xxxxxxx>
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thursday, August 13, 1998 10:11 AM
> Subject: Re: Telescan
>
>
> >
> >
> >Bill Saxon wrote:
> >
> >> Things have just been going too smoothly with these people. I knew it
> couldn't
> >> last. I downloaded fine with AIQ but Equis Downloader give repeated
> "Network
> >> Logon Failed". Anyone else have any problem. It is possible the files
> became
> >> corrupted and Telescan thinks I have already received the data.... or
> >> something. I'm sure Telescan is not at fault.<]:0)
> >
> > I have the same problem and the quality of the data is getting
> worse and
> worse.
> >Christian.
> >
> >
>
|