PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
what groups are you in...
At 10:06 PM 8/11/98 , you wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I have been lurking this email group for weeks and have contributed
>several postings.
>
>>From my observations and drawing a comparison to other Users Groups and
>Email/Newsgroups for trading, this list is just the 'bitchers' among MS
>users; or else Equis overstates the number of software packages that
>they have sold. If professional traders of greater numbers like Al T.
>were using this product you would be hearing from 20 or 30 seasoned pros
>instead of 5 or 6; or perhaps those pros don't waste their time on this
>email group --- for obvious reasons.
>
>Adios,
>
>Jim Martin
>A 25 year futures trader.
>
>
>>From majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Tue Aug 11 18:33:47 1998
>>Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
>> by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA06103
>> for metastock-outgoing; Tue, 11 Aug 1998 19:02:40 -0600
>>X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to
>owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
>>Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com
>[204.246.137.5])
>> by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA06100
>> for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 11 Aug 1998 19:02:38 -0600
>>Received: from mtiwmhc01.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc01.worldnet.att.net
>[204.127.131.36])
>> by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA13780
>> for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 11 Aug 1998 19:11:17 -0600 (MDT)
>>Received: from none ([12.68.134.165]) by mtiwmhc01.worldnet.att.net
>> (InterMail v03.02.03 118 118 102) with SMTP
>> id <19980812010314.PINN29646@xxxx> for
><metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
>> Wed, 12 Aug 1998 01:03:14 +0000
>>Message-ID: <045801bdc58c$f4accaa0$a586440c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>From: "Richard Siletti" <richieds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Subject: Re: Bitching about Metastock
>>Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 20:59:01 -0400
>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>Content-Type: text/plain;
>> charset="iso-8859-1"
>>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>X-Priority: 3
>>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3115.0
>>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
>>Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Precedence: bulk
>>Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>Metastock is a good product but it does have some major faults which
>Equis
>>has been either unwilling or unable to address. The inability to system
>test
>>a block of stocks makes this feature largely useless to the average
>trader.
>>As for me, I simply can't understand the inability replace the old DOS
>>macros. It appears that they have gotten a bit stale. Reminds me of how
>>Compuserve used to be back in the $6.00 an hr. days. This sort of
>>complaining went on all the time back in their forums with no responses
>from
>>Compuserve. Today they are begging for business. I'm not saying Equis
>is in
>>that category but keep in mind that the people that frequent this list
>are
>>the harder core users and their complaints are probably legit.
>>
>>
>>Richie
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Patrick Gamble <pgamble@xxxxxxxxx>
>>To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Date: Friday, August 07, 1998 2:37 PM
>>Subject: Bitching about Metastock
>>
>>
>>>Of course Equis should take note of their user community, as
>>>good business practice. What that doesn't mean is that the
>>>loudest and rudest are right.
>>>
>>>What I was objecting to was the increasingly strident tone of
>>>the posts about the company. I'm glad to see that the company
>>>is setting up channels for voices to be heard.
>>>
>>>I need all the concentration I have to trade successfully, so now
>>>I'll shut up.
>>>
>>>Good trading.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>______________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
**************************
Have a nice day
Jim kerwin
Atlanta, Georgia U.S.A.
**************************
|