|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
No problem. Most of the presenters at the various seminars use Trade
Station. Understand that Omega is very determined that any "guru" will
have their software and priority tech support. More often than not, this
translates into subsidizing on Omega's part. But this is just a normal
American Way of doing business. See Auto Racing, Bowling, Fishing, etc,etc.
Write a book or be listed in Futures top trading systems, and you will have
TS, and you will not even have to pay the Fed-Ex charges.
Al Taglavore
----------
> From: Tom Strickland <tstrickland@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Futures Magazine
> Date: Saturday, August 08, 1998 2:32 PM
>
> I'm writing to determine the views of other Metastock users about Futures
> magazine. Recently I wrote Ms. Ginger Szala, Editor in Chief of Futures
to
> complain that their technical articles were difficult to read because 1)
> they were often incomplete (no references or symbol definitions), and 2)
> they used TradeStation code instead of ordinary mathematical symbols to
> describe systems and indicators.
>
> The response to my e-mail was less than satisfactory. I was told that I
was
> "too picky" about the details of the articles and that the use of
> TradeStation was just an industry trend that they were following.
>
> I just came across a copy of Omega Research Magazine and it contains an
ad
> for Futures magazine that states, "…Futures is prepared by the same
> editorial team that brings you Omega Research Magazine…" Closer
examination
> showed that Ms. Szala is also the Editorial Director of Omega Research
> Magazine. This looks like a major conflict of interest, particularly
since
> Futures does not, to the best of my knowledge, acknowledge their
financial
> interest in the use of TradeStation code.
>
> Is this a problem to anyone else? Just curious!
>
> Tom Strickland
> tstrickland@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
|