|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Yes! I would pay for a "power" version. Several of the posts here today
and yesterday have been far more sophisticated than my superficial
complaints, and I endorse them. A real queryable database for example. I
had no idea that Equis used to have so many features that it took away
without ever even asking its user base.
I hope we are being heard- does anyone know Steve Achelis's email- or a good
name and address to write a letter to someone in upper management? If so,
please post it. I will certainly pen a letter, and try to capture in it
most of what I've read here the last two days.
Alton Stephens
astephen@xxxxxxxx
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Al Taglavore
> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 1998 1:42 PM
> To: MetaStock List Group
> Subject: MetaStock Program
>
>
> Having read too many of the posted Equis shortcomings, I would
> like to pose
> yet another question.
> Would it not be appropriate for Equis to produce two versions of
> MetaStock?
> Version 6.xx for the beginner to intermediate user, and Version
> XX for the
> advanced/professional community? Then Equis could price the products
> commensurate with their contents and the investing community the product
> was designed to serve.
>
> Al Taglavore
>
|