|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<HTML>
<P>metastock-digest wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>metastock-digest
Friday, July 31 1998 Volume
01 : Number 211
<P>----------------------------------------------------------------------
<P>Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 21:19:40 PDT
<BR>From: "Bill Sklodowski" <bsklodowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<BR>Subject: Real-time data vendors
<P>Greetings;
<P>I'm thinking of trying out the new MS Real-Time, or maybe one of the
<BR>other real-time TA programs. I know NOTHING about getting that type
of
<BR>data. I do have cable at my house, and I know that some of the vendors
<BR>deliver that way. I'd like to hear from folks already using real-time
<BR>data: What are the costs for installation, hardware, and (most
<BR>importantly) the monthly cost for the service, and what data you get
for
<BR>that $$.
<P>Thanks in advance,
<BR>Bill Sklodowski
<P>______________________________________________________
<BR>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
<P>------------------------------
<P>Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 23:54:25 -0500
<BR>From: "William F. Nakielski" <frt1000@xxxxxxxxxx>
<BR>Subject: Re: Opinion needed for SuperCharts 4.0
<P>Visavis,
<P>And so ask I shall. With all those programs, which one do you
consider the
<BR>best and second best.
<P>Also specifically what is your opinion on Advanced GET and Fib Trader.
I've
<BR>been considering purchasing one or the other. It's use would
be mostly, but
<BR>not limited to trading the Spoos intra-day. Other markets either
intra-day
<BR>or short term position.
<P>Do you or anyone else have an opinion on ASC Trend.
<P>Yours in Profound Prolific Prognostications,
<P>Bill N. [|:-)}
<P>- -----Original Message-----
<BR>From: Visavis <Visavis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<BR>To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<BR>Date: Thursday, July 30, 1998 06:49 PM
<BR>Subject: Re: Opinion needed for SuperCharts 4.0
<P>>Sure!
<BR>>
<BR>>You can ask me anything like Superchart, Tradestation, Advanced GET,
<BR>Metastock, Fibonacci Trader, Dynamic Trader, WinWaves, Investor Dream,
<BR>Visual Pattern Designer, etc.... I do have it all.
<BR>>
<BR>>
<BR>>At 05:07 PM 7/30/98 +0800, you wrote:
<BR>>>Hello. I wonder if anybody here uses SuperCharts 4.0.
<BR>>>Please could you provide me with your email address so
<BR>>>that I can email you some questions about the program
<BR>>>off-list.
<BR>>>
<BR>>>Thanks,
<BR>>>
<BR>>>Steve Gochuico
<BR>>>
<BR>>>
<BR>>-
<BR>>
<BR>>v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v Visavis v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v
<BR>>
<BR>>
<BR>>
<BR>>
<BR>>
<BR>>
<BR>>
<BR>>
<BR>>
<BR>>
<BR>>
<BR>>
<BR>>
<P>------------------------------
<P>Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 22:03:08 -0700
<BR>From: Harvey Pearce <hhp@xxxxxxxx>
<BR>Subject: Re: Money Flow Index
<P>The Tom Williams site is:
<P>http://www.ocea.es/vsa/vsa.htm
<P>>From the site:
<P>"Volume Spread Analysis software can be a very powerful aid to
<BR>profitable market timing. It uses an extension of Wyckoff's methods
<BR>translated into a precise rule based technique to give leading signals
<BR>on futures, stocks and forex in real time and on an end of day basis."
<P>Harvey Pearce, Victoria, B.C., Canada
<BR>=====================================
<P>Cab Vinton wrote:
<BR>>
<BR>> There's a fellow by the name of Tom Williams, I think, who's done
some
<BR>> good work with volume.
<BR>>
<BR>> He has a program called Volume Spread Analysis, and wrote a book
called
<BR>> Undisclosed Secrets of (something or other).
<BR>>
<BR>> He has a website, with a downloadable demo. (Use a search engine
to find
<BR>> it.) Pretty interesting, at least at first blush.
<BR>>
<BR>> Cheers,
<BR>>
<BR>> CAB VINTON
<BR>> cvinton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<P>------------------------------
<P>Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 11:09:20 +0200
<BR>From: "A.J. Maas" <anthmaas@xxxxxx>
<BR>Subject: Re: Cool Website
<P>>Calling the market is beyond anyone's capability on an intermediate
or long
<BR>>time basis, especially if you use the smoke and mirrors of funnymentals
to
<BR>>explain price/market action. The only facts we have are price,
<BR>>time and volume, the rest is opinion
<P>Facts are:
<BR>Fundamentals+Sentiment = Price+Actions explained and expressed in trends
<P>Both components can be brought to you via News and/or be discovered
by inspecting their
<BR>internals using both TA and FA systems. With the emphasis put on the
"reading" of each
<BR>components single or combined and in conjunction with the use of special
analysis filters then
<BR>helps to explain any 'whys' outcomes in past, present and in future.
<P>Neither of these analyse systems is perfect, combined just about are
as much as can be desired.
<BR>Predictions and estimates can be made on both historical and future
estimated figures, data and
<BR>outlook, but present presentations of the halve year results have again
proven these to be naturaly
<BR>imperfect, with as outcome that prices of several companies shares
publishing negative news in
<BR>halve year results and futher 1998/future outlook were wrongly estimated
in the first place and as
<BR>such some of the their share prices have dropped dramatically, others
where left stable and on the
<BR>other hand some others with few or very possitive news and forecasts
were able to gain upwards.
<BR>For these results only the single companies accounting departments
have the key, temperarely
<BR>hidden behind companies doors until they are published.
<P>Neither systems are in this case the perfect right predictor, in fact
they are only able to guess as
<BR>to what the outcomes might be and as such also frequently supprise
both analists and markets,
<BR>one of the reasons why the markets and price are not always right and
move up or down in time
<BR>as they have done and will continue to do.
<P>Market's prices are always the fundamentals with the sentiment as trends
added and i.e. at the
<BR>time of results publishing, the major factors to be reckonned with.
<BR>Ignoring either one will have great effect on the creation of succesfull
results, aside from using
<BR>the wrong sources, systems and filters, not withletting the fact that
one can be succesfull using
<BR>only a single one of the components, as has been historicaly proven.
Asian and European
<BR>markets have used these in a wide variaty since the 16th century(1500+)
when regular trading
<BR>started, first as the open markets and later as indoors fairs, auctions,
bourses, exchanges etc.
<P>As much as there are old hat FA analysts not letting modern wisdom and
technology into their
<BR>analytical world, there are also TA analysts ignorant to the established
history and science.
<BR>Whatever sytems used, single or combined, all can be succesfull but
will mainly depend on ones
<BR>skills, expertise and ferm stands towards implementing and applying
them.
<P>Knowledge and experience can be established with study and practise.
Disapointments for one
<BR>does not nessaceraly mean a disapointment for others.
<P>Ignorence is then irrelevent and not the question.
<P>Regards,
<BR>Ton Maas
<BR>Ms-IRB@xxxxxxxxx
<P>------------------------------
<P>Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 06:22:30 -0400
<BR>From: Cab Vinton <cvinton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<BR>Subject: Re: Money Flow Index
<P>Message-ID: <35C09A86.54A6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<BR>Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 12:08:38 -0400
<BR>From: Cab Vinton <cvinton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<BR>Reply-To: cvinton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<BR>X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I)
<BR>MIME-Version: 1.0
<BR>To: Lionel Issen <lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<BR>Subject: Re: Money Flow Index
<BR>References: <000801bdbbc4$69c8e6c0$0be8490c@xxxxxx>
<BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
<BR>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<P>Lionel Issen wrote:
<BR>>
<BR>> Cab:
<BR>> About a year or 2 ago there was a discussion on this listserver about
this
<BR>> book. One person who had actually read Williams book thought
that it was
<BR>> overpricedand not as readable as Richard Arms book on volume.
<BR>>
<BR>> Have you used Williams program?
<BR>>
<BR>> Lionel
<P>Nope. Just downloaded the demo & thought it was interesting.
<P>Ideas are probably hard to program, but no harder than candlesticks:
a
<BR>little familiarity with fuzzy logic would probably help, but that's
<BR>beyond me for now.
<P>Cheers,
<P>CAB.
<P>------------------------------
<P>Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 09:51:12 +0100
<BR>From: Robert Wilcock <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<BR>Subject: Re: Money Flow Index
<P>In message <000801bdbbc4$69c8e6c0$0be8490c@xxxxxx>, Lionel
<BR>Issen <lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
<BR>>Cab:
<BR>>About a year or 2 ago there was a discussion on this listserver about
this
<BR>>book. One person who had actually read Williams book thought
that it was
<BR>>overpricedand not as readable as Richard Arms book on volume.
<BR>>
<BR>>Have you used Williams program?
<BR>>
<P>I have used the program for the UK market and found it marginal at
<BR>best. Looking at the historical signals, it was showing a small profit,
<BR>mostly on a very few stocks. What I didn't realise when I was
<BR>carrying out this exercise was that the software backdated the signal
<BR>one or two days, which would have made a vast difference to the
<BR>model profitability.
<P>>Lionel
<BR>>
<P>- --
<BR>Robert Wilcock
<P>------------------------------
<P>Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 07:55:14 -0400
<BR>From: John Manasco <manasco@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
<BR>Subject: e-mail server down
<P>All
<P>My e-mail server has been down for most of the last two days. If anyone
<BR>tried to contact me personally please repost the message. Thanks
<P>John Manasco
<P>------------------------------
<P>Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 08:03:51 -0400
<BR>From: Tom Rivet <55crownvictoria@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<BR>Subject: Re: Major support
<P>Hi:
<BR>I remember reading and studying what I believe comes from Pring...
That the Dow
<BR>Utilities(which is actually the cost of money), will lead the Dow Ind,
by 6-9
<BR>months. Set up a long term chart of both, and look for the corralation.,and
see
<BR>what you think.....Tom
<P>HARELSDB@xxxxxxx wrote:
<P>> If I am not mistaken, according to DOW Theory, a Bear market will
be signaled
<BR>> if the DOW Industrials make a new low on the current reaction below
the low on
<BR>> the previous reation. This is after the DOW Transports failed
to confirm the
<BR>> most recent high on the DOW Industrials and the Transports made a
new lower
<BR>> low today.
<BR>>
<BR>> I would be interested in hearing alternate interpretations from those
who
<BR>> might be more versed in DOW Theory than I.
<BR>>
<BR>> Thanks,
<BR>>
<BR>> Dan Harelson
<P>------------------------------
<P>Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 09:57:19 -0400
<BR>From: jlm4@xxxxxxxxxxxx
<BR>Subject: Re: Telescan and NH/NL and Adv/Dec
<P>I remember something about some indexes called ISSUES NASDAQ,
ISSUES NYSE,
<BR>AND ISSUES AMEX. for giving you advances, declines, and unchanged.
Symbols
<BR>I can't remember but went something like .iss_
<BR>Downloaded data broke down as follows for the respective exchanges:
<BR>Open - unchanged
<BR>High - advances
<BR>Low - declines
<BR>Close - unchanged
<P>A chart of the data isn't too enlightening. You have to set up an indicator
<BR>and grab and pull it down on the chart ; i.e. high minus low.
<P>Joe
<P>------------------------------
<P>Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 14:33:55 GMT
<BR>From: Visavis <Visavis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<BR>Subject: Re: Opinion needed for SuperCharts 4.0
<P>Its really in the personality of the user to match the use of a certain
program to find it as a gem or otherwise. What is his tolerance level
towards trading like stops, risks, profits layed in the table, etc...
<P>I like Omega's Superchart/Tradestation because of its user's friendly
features. I got the trading ideas & methods from other softwares
& its almost 75% (rough draft idea) can be conceive into the SC/TS
indicators ela. Its hard to compare SC/TS in terms of program speed
with the others because of its 16 bit nature. While Equis's MetaStock
is really got lots of improvement since the release of its 32 bit version
5.11 program. Equis had also providing recently the so called transportability
of its indicators for other users.
<P>While the other programs are not really suitable to my personality use
like Gann's, Elliot, projections, cycles, etc... But not that it does not
work. Just not suitable for my stomach. They are all good programs.
Its really lots of ways to reach the destination.
<P>Important thing is to know first what fits your personality style.
Then choosing the software no matter how much it cost & it would not
be too expensive whrn you would really treasure it. I bet to read
& learn first from the books for teh methodology then find the corresponding
software to use with it. Even a Holy Grail is in your hand
but you don't know how to use it or find it not suitable for your use then
its totally TRASH.
<P>I won't hold back anyone's growth by just saying which software is gold
or stone. Remember, expensive things had its market while cheap things
had its market share too.
<P>At 11:54 PM 7/30/98 -0500, William F. Nakielski wrote:
<P>>Visavis,
<P>>
<P>>And so ask I shall. With all those programs, which one do you
consider the
<P>>best and second best.
<P>>
<P><center>-
<P>v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v Visavis v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v
<P></center>
<P>------------------------------
<P>Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 09:42:11 -0500
<BR>From: wayne walusiak <waynewal@xxxxxxxxx>
<BR>Subject: Re: Telechart 2000
<P>re: Telechart 2000 Ver 4
<P>Rob: I liked this new TC version, but it was 2.50 per day for downloads.
I
<BR>didn't understand their rate strcuture and thought that if you downloaded
once
<BR>a week - I swore it only charged for one day - but when I did it that
way
<BR>after 2 weeks I got hit for 10 days of charges. Guess I gotta call
and see
<BR>what the rate schedule really is.
<BR>Now if they only did futures I'd do them exclusively, but....any ideas
?
<BR>Thanks!
<BR>Wayne Walusiak
<P>------------------------------
<P>Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 09:44:09 -0500
<BR>From: wayne walusiak <waynewal@xxxxxxxxx>
<BR>Subject: Re: Telechart 2000
<P>Dear Richard,
<P>Have you tried TC2000 ver 4 ? If so, what do you think ? Thanks!
<BR>Wayne Walusiak
<P>------------------------------
<P>Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 09:03:55 -0500
<BR>From: tvk2@xxxxxxxx
<BR>Subject: Re: Opinion needed for SuperCharts 4.0
<P>Are you familiar with the Prime Line program? T.C.
<BR>On Thu, 30 Jul 1998 23:29:20 GMT Visavis <Visavis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
writes:
<BR>>Sure!
<BR>>
<BR>>
<BR>>You can ask me anything like Superchart, Tradestation, Advanced GET,
<BR>>Metastock, Fibonacci Trader, Dynamic Trader, WinWaves, Investor Dream,
<BR>>Visual Pattern Designer, etc.... I do have it all.
<BR>>
<BR>>
<BR>>
<BR>>At 05:07 PM 7/30/98 +0800, you wrote:
<BR>>
<BR>>>Hello. I wonder if anybody here uses SuperCharts 4.0.
<BR>>
<BR>>>Please could you provide me with your email address so
<BR>>
<BR>>>that I can email you some questions about the program
<BR>>
<BR>>>off-list.
<BR>>
<BR>>>
<BR>>
<BR>>>Thanks,
<BR>>
<BR>>>
<BR>>
<BR>>>Steve Gochuico
<BR>>
<BR>>>
<BR>>
<BR>>>
<BR>>
<BR>><center>-
<BR>>
<BR>>
<BR>>v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v Visavis v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v
<BR>>
<BR>>
<BR>></center>
<BR>>
<BR>>
<BR>>
<BR>>
<BR>>
<BR>>
<BR>>
<BR>>
<BR>>
<BR>>
<BR>>
<BR>>
<P>_____________________________________________________________________
<BR>You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
<BR>Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
<BR>Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
<P>------------------------------
<P>Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 19:09:25 +0400
<BR>From: oleg <lego@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<BR>Subject: Re: metastock-digest V1 #210
<P>metastock-digest wrote:
<P>> metastock-digest Thursday,
July 30 1998 Volume 01 : Number
210
<BR>>
<BR>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
<BR>>
<BR>> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 18:34:21 -0400
<BR>> From: michael arnoldi <marnoldi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<BR>> Subject: Re: Telescan and NH/NL and Adv/Dec
<BR>>
<BR>> http://quote.yahoo.com/m0?u
<BR>>
<BR>> has it all.
<BR>>
<BR>> mike
<BR>>
<BR>> ------------------------------
<BR>>
<BR>> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 18:26:49 -0700
<BR>> From: Vitaly Larichev <vitaly@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<BR>> Subject: How many of us are on the List?
<BR>>
<BR>> Equis,
<BR>> How many of us are on the list? Realizing that my post will be looked
at
<BR>> if not read, by 100, 1000, ... people may force me to
<BR>> reconsider broadcasting "Thank you, John", "You are a moron, George",
<BR>> "Put me on your list, Sam" messages.
<BR>>
<BR>> Cheers, Vitaly
<BR>>
<BR>> ------------------------------
<BR>>
<BR>> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 19:02:44 -0700
<BR>> From: Vitaly Larichev <vitaly@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<BR>> Subject: Internet sites to get Fair Values for Stock Index Futures?
<BR>>
<BR>> Hi all,
<BR>>
<BR>> I don't trade futures, so am pretty much ignorant on this. Yet S&P
500,
<BR>> NASDAQ 100 index futures checked (from CME) in the morning before
<BR>> opening are a good way to probe the market sentiment, if volatile,
<BR>> before trading starts. To do it, you are to compare the current spread
<BR>> to Fair Value. I am wondering, are there Internet sites to pick up
<BR>> today's/yesterday's Fair Values (for a lead contract)? I used
<BR>> to use some, but being run by individuals, they are not always
<BR>> dependable (vacations, sick days, etc.). Mind I am not asking about
<BR>> the formula, but Internet sites to get values.
<BR>>
<BR>> Thank you very much.
<BR>>
<BR>> Cheers, Vitaly
<BR>>
<BR>> P.S. For a discussion of Fair Value and related issues, see
<BR>> http://www.cnbc.com/moreinfo/0325_fairvalue.html
<BR>>
<BR>> ------------------------------
<BR>>
<BR>> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 23:29:20 GMT
<BR>> From: Visavis <Visavis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<BR>> Subject: Re: Opinion needed for SuperCharts 4.0
<BR>>
<BR>> Sure!
<BR>>
<BR>> You can ask me anything like Superchart, Tradestation, Advanced GET,
Metastock, Fibonacci Trader, Dynamic Trader, WinWaves, Investor Dream,
Visual Pattern Designer, etc.... I do have it all.
<BR>>
<BR>> At 05:07 PM 7/30/98 +0800, you wrote:
<BR>>
<BR>> >Hello. I wonder if anybody here uses SuperCharts 4.0.
<BR>>
<BR>> >Please could you provide me with your email address so
<BR>>
<BR>> >that I can email you some questions about the program
<BR>>
<BR>> >off-list.
<BR>>
<BR>> >
<BR>>
<BR>> >Thanks,
<BR>>
<BR>> >
<BR>>
<BR>> >Steve Gochuico
<BR>>
<BR>> >
<BR>>
<BR>> >
<BR>>
<BR>> <center>-
<BR>>
<BR>> v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v Visavis v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v
<BR>>
<BR>> </center>
<BR>>
<BR>> ------------------------------
<BR>>
<BR>> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1998 21:52:32 -0400
<BR>> From: "Bill G Bolumen" <BOLUMENB@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<BR>> Subject: Re: PERSONAL ATTACKS
<BR>>
<BR>> Thanks, Tom, for conveying the thoughts of all of us that have
known
<BR>> Richard for many years of unselfishly helping others. It is
those that do
<BR>> not know him (those new to this and other boards of TA) that will
never
<BR>> know what they missed when he is not around.
<BR>> If you see this message, Richard, I will apologize for those who
do not.
<BR>> Bill
<BR>>
<BR>> - ----------
<BR>> > From: Thomas A Smith <thomasabsmith1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<BR>> > To: Metastock <metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<BR>> > Subject: PERSONAL ATTACKS
<BR>> > Date: Tuesday, July 28, 1998 9:20 PM
<BR>> >
<BR>> > THERE IS NO REASON TO ATTACK ONE ANOTHER ON A
<BR>> > PERSONAL LEVEL. SOME OF THE BEST INFORMATION
<BR>> > ON THIS LIST HAS COME FROM"RICHARD ESTES"!!!!!!!
<BR>> > A FRIEND OF MINE WHO FLIES FOR FEDEX TELLS ME
<BR>> > A BEER IN PARIS BY THE TOWER WILL RUN $20-US,
<BR>> > COFFEE IN MOST PLACES HOTELS OVER THERE
<BR>> > WILL COST $5TO7 US. HERE IN SPOKANE 2.50 COFFEE
<BR>> > IS NOT UNCOMMON. RICHARD WILL FIGURE AT SOME POINT,
<BR>> > LIKE I DID SOME YEARS AGO, THAT HE CANNOT FILTER
<BR>> > OUT THE ATTACKS ON A PERSONAL LEVEL AND WILL
<BR>> > STOP INTERACTING. THEN I ASSURE EVERYONE
<BR>> > RICHARD WILL NOT BE THE LOSER. I HAVE NEVER READ
<BR>> > A SILLY POST FROM "RICHARD". THE PROBLEM IS RICHARD
<BR>> > IS FAR TO ADVANCED FOR MANY FOLKS ON THIS LIST.
<BR>> > MUCH PEACE AND HAPPINESS TO ALL
<BR>> >
TOM SMITH
<BR>>
<BR>> ------------------------------
<BR>>
<BR>> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 20:36:35 -0400
<BR>> From: "Bradley C. Mitchell" <bradmit@xxxxxxxx>
<BR>> Subject: RE: Telescan and NH/NL and Adv/Dec
<BR>>
<BR>> Reuters has the NH & NL and the ADV/DEC
<BR>>
<BR>> - -----Original Message-----
<BR>> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
<BR>> On Behalf Of michael arnoldi
<BR>> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 1998 6:34 PM
<BR>> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<BR>> Subject: Re: Telescan and
NH/NL and Adv/Dec
<BR>>
<BR>> http://quote.yahoo.com/m0?u
<BR>>
<BR>> has it all.
<BR>>
<BR>> mike
<BR>>
<BR>> ------------------------------
<BR>>
<BR>> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 20:37:40 -0400
<BR>> From: "Bradley C. Mitchell" <bradmit@xxxxxxxx>
<BR>> Subject: RE: Network installation
<BR>>
<BR>> Try not installing the videos.
<BR>>
<BR>> - -----Original Message-----
<BR>> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
<BR>> On Behalf Of Zvi
<BR>> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 1998 5:02 PM
<BR>> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<BR>> Subject: Network installation
<BR>>
<BR>> Does any one have any experience in installation Metastock 6.5 on
<BR>> network?
<BR>> I recently tried to install it on the Novell network.
<BR>> When installing files on network drive (the "Complete/Custom"option),
<BR>> after copying 52% of files a message appears (everytime!) "Can not
copy
<BR>> files due to internal error". I tried to install from diskettes -
the
<BR>> same message appears almost immediatly.
<BR>>
<BR>> Any suggestions?
<BR>>
<BR>> Zvi
<BR>>
<BR>> ------------------------------
<BR>>
<BR>> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 05:53:53 -0700
<BR>> From: {USER_FIRSTNAME} {USER_LASTNAME} <robertbennet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<BR>> Subject: Re: Opinion needed for SuperCharts 4.0
<BR>>
<BR>> Please - I have Omni Trader Trade station and Metastock What do you
like best? Omni is the easyest for me to use.
<BR>> Thanks Bob
<BR>>
<BR>> Visavis wrote:
<BR>>
<BR>> > Sure!
<BR>> >
<BR>> > You can ask me anything like Superchart, Tradestation, Advanced
GET, Metastock, Fibonacci Trader, Dynamic Trader, WinWaves, Investor Dream,
Visual Pattern Designer, etc.... I do have it all.
<BR>> >
<BR>> > At 05:07 PM 7/30/98 +0800, you wrote:
<BR>> > >Hello. I wonder if anybody here uses SuperCharts 4.0.
<BR>> > >Please could you provide me with your email address so
<BR>> > >that I can email you some questions about the program
<BR>> > >off-list.
<BR>> > >
<BR>> > >Thanks,
<BR>> > >
<BR>> > >Steve Gochuico
<BR>> > >
<BR>> > >
<BR>> >
d 4´|µr
<BR>> > x¹"
<BR>> > mlH-k
<BR>>
<BR>> ------------------------------
<BR>>
<BR>> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 20:52:56 -0500
<BR>> From: Bob Wiseman <bwiseman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<BR>> Subject: Re: Opinion needed for SuperCharts 4.0
<BR>>
<BR>> Hi There:
<BR>>
<BR>> I'm about to buy still more software and would sure like to ask you
some very specific questions as well as for a general recommendation.
Can I get your email address so I could get you more
<BR>> directly? Sure would appreciate it.
<BR>>
<BR>> Thanx
<BR>>
<BR>> Bob
bwiseman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<BR>>
<BR>> Visavis wrote:
<BR>>
<BR>> > Sure!
<BR>> >
<BR>> > You can ask me anything like Superchart, Tradestation, Advanced
GET, Metastock, Fibonacci Trader, Dynamic Trader, WinWaves, Investor Dream,
Visual Pattern Designer, etc.... I do have it all.
<BR>> >
<BR>> > At 05:07 PM 7/30/98 +0800, you wrote:
<BR>> > >Hello. I wonder if anybody here uses SuperCharts 4.0.
<BR>> > >Please could you provide me with your email address so
<BR>> > >that I can email you some questions about the program
<BR>> > >off-list.
<BR>> > >
<BR>> > >Thanks,
<BR>> > >
<BR>> > >Steve Gochuico
<BR>> > >
<BR>> > >
<BR>> >
<BR>> >
<BR>> >
Ä€I_
<BR>> >
<BR>> >
<BR>> >
<BR>>
<BR>> ------------------------------
<BR>>
<BR>> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 11:32:41 +1000
<BR>> From: "Dick Simmons" <simmons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<BR>> Subject: Re: Cool Web site
<BR>>
<BR>> Hi All,
<BR>>
<BR>> Stockmarket Bubbles at www.albany.eu is a good read about plunges
on the
<BR>> S&P.
<BR>>
<BR>> Regards,
<BR>> Dick
<BR>>
<BR>> ------------------------------
<BR>>
<BR>> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 19:11:26 -0700
<BR>> From: Fred Naef <quest@xxxxxxxxx>
<BR>> Subject: Re: Telescan and NH/NL and Adv/Dec
<BR>>
<BR>> Hello:
<BR>>
<BR>> I am a new user of Metastock 6.5...I'm interested in starting a
<BR>> user group in my immediate area: the Bay Area-Contra Costa County
<BR>> in Northern California...8 miles from UC Berkeley...
<BR>>
<BR>> My only motive is to learn from others and to share my knowledge
<BR>> move up the learning curve..If you are interested you can contact
me..
<BR>> Yes, I am a registered broker. I use Telescan as primary screen..use
<BR>> MS as additional technical analysis tool
<BR>>
<BR>> Thanks
<BR>>
<BR>> Fred Naef
<BR>>
<BR>> quest@xxxxxxxxx
<BR>>
<BR>> ------------------------------
<BR>>
<BR>> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 22:24:35 -0400
<BR>> From: "Alton Stephens" <astephen@xxxxxxxx>
<BR>> Subject: RE: Telescan and NH/NL and Adv/Dec
<BR>>
<BR>> Bradley, thanks. This is the next best thing to having the
data
<BR>> downloadable in Metastock format.
<BR>>
<BR>> Al Stephens
<BR>>
<BR>> > -----Original Message-----
<BR>> > From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<BR>> > [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Bradley C. Mitchell
<BR>> > Sent: Thursday, July 30, 1998 8:37 PM
<BR>> > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<BR>> > Subject: RE: Telescan and NH/NL and Adv/Dec
<BR>> >
<BR>> >
<BR>> > Reuters has the NH & NL and the ADV/DEC
<BR>> >
<BR>> > -----Original Message-----
<BR>> > From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
<BR>> > On Behalf Of michael arnoldi
<BR>> > Sent: Thursday, July 30, 1998 6:34 PM
<BR>> > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<BR>> > Subject: Re: Telescan and NH/NL and
Adv/Dec
<BR>> >
<BR>> > http://quote.yahoo.com/m0?u
<BR>> >
<BR>> > has it all.
<BR>> >
<BR>> > mike
<BR>> >
<BR>>
<BR>> ------------------------------
<BR>>
<BR>> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 05:26:56 +0300
<BR>> From: Zvi <consilium@xxxxxxx>
<BR>> Subject: Re: Network installation
<BR>>
<BR>> Bradley C. Mitchell wrote:
<BR>> >
<BR>> > Try not installing the videos.
<BR>> >
<BR>> > -----Original Message-----
<BR>> > From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
<BR>> > On Behalf Of Zvi
<BR>> > Sent: Thursday, July 30, 1998 5:02 PM
<BR>> > To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<BR>> > Subject: Network installation
<BR>> >
<BR>> > Does any one have any experience in installation Metastock 6.5
on
<BR>> > network?
<BR>> > I recently tried to install it on the Novell network.
<BR>> > When installing files on network drive (the "Complete/Custom"option),
<BR>> > after copying 52% of files a message appears (everytime!) "Can
not copy
<BR>> > files due to internal error". I tried to install from diskettes
- the
<BR>> > same message appears almost immediatly.
<BR>> >
<BR>> > Any suggestions?
<BR>> >
<BR>> > Zvi
<BR>>
<BR>> That happens before starting the installation, on the "Copying files"
<BR>> stage.
<BR>>
<BR>> Zvi
<BR>>
<BR>> ------------------------------
<BR>>
<BR>> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 22:58:09 -0400
<BR>> From: Rob Cloutier <cloutier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<BR>> Subject: RE: Telechart 2000
<BR>>
<BR>> I am evaluating it now... I had used TC2000 version 3 and liked it,
but
<BR>> the graphics did not keep up with the technology. Version 4
is real nice.
<BR>> However, the ability to program indicators is not nearly as
extensive as
<BR>> NetaStock. But, you get the entire database of NYSE, ASE and
OTC every
<BR>> night. That costs about $60.00 per month. However, with
that data is
<BR>> fundamental data, e.g. PE, etc. hard to compare the two different
<BR>> products. My Rueters data subscription runs out in August,
so I need to
<BR>> make a decision soon. Leaning back toward TC2000 and away from
Metastock
<BR>> right now, but that might change...
<BR>>
<BR>> Rob Cloutier
<BR>> cloutier@xxxxxxxxxxx
<BR>>
<BR>> - -----Original Message-----
<BR>> From: tvk2@xxxxxxxx
<BR>> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 1998 11:09 AM
<BR>> To: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<BR>> Subject: Telechart 2000
<BR>>
<BR>> Have you seen the ad in Investors Business Daily about Tele 2000?
<BR>> Supposed to be a new hot-the-trot way to screen 9000 stocks in sec.
It's
<BR>> a free trial--30 days. Will give it a go, Any comments?
T.C.
<BR>>
<BR>> _____________________________________________________________________
<BR>> You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
<BR>> Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
<BR>> Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
<BR>>
<BR>> ------------------------------
<BR>>
<BR>> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 18:25:26 -0500
<BR>> From: "Lionel Issen" <lissen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<BR>> Subject: Re: Telescan and NH/NL and Adv/Dec
<BR>>
<BR>> QP2 Plus has these numbers. When you update the daily data
you can print
<BR>> them out. Remember to first set your paper to landscape, otherwise
it wont
<BR>> be very readable
<BR>>
<BR>> Lionel
<BR>>
<BR>> - -----Original Message-----
<BR>> From: Alton Stephens <astephen@xxxxxxxx>
<BR>> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<BR>> Date: Thursday, July 30, 1998 5:00 PM
<BR>> Subject: RE: Telescan and NH/NL and Adv/Dec
<BR>>
<BR>> >Bill, they absolutely do not have these numbers. I called
them just the
<BR>> >other day about it. Not even Worden has the NH/NL numbers
but I understand
<BR>> >QP does.
<BR>> >
<BR>> >
<BR>> >Alton Stephens
<BR>> >astephen@xxxxxxxx
<BR>> >
<BR>> >
<BR>> >
<BR>> >
<BR>> >> -----Original Message-----
<BR>> >> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<BR>> >> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Bill Saxon
<BR>> >> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 1998 1:06 PM
<BR>> >> To: Fasttrack EMail List; Metastock EMail List
<BR>> >> Subject: Telescan and NH/NL and Adv/Dec
<BR>> >>
<BR>> >>
<BR>> >> I have a need to get the above daily data from Telescan.
I could
<BR>> >> not find it at
<BR>> >> their website of Indexes. I called them and got a young
lady who
<BR>> >> simply could
<BR>> >> not understand what I even wanted. She kept wanted to think
it
<BR>> >> was the High and
<BR>> >> Low for the day for the S&P. When she asked me if I
was sure
<BR>> >> this wasn't what I
<BR>> >> needed I just said thank you very much.
<BR>> >>
<BR>> >> Does anyone know these Symbols? They have Up and Down Volume
<BR>> >> strangely enough.
<BR>> >> I can't believe they wouldn't have these basic numbers.
<BR>> >>
<BR>> >
<BR>>
<BR>> ------------------------------
<BR>>
<BR>> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 23:34:00 -0500
<BR>> From: Rajesh <rajesh@xxxxxxxx>
<BR>> Subject: Advise from an Elliotician
<BR>>
<BR>> - --------------3A7F45E9EC5E3ADDDD4BE12E
<BR>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
<BR>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<BR>>
<BR>> Hello folks,
<BR>>
<BR>> Received this from a friend of mine who follows the Elliot wave theory.
<BR>> This is just for you info.
<BR>>
<BR>> He is currently travelling so doesnt have proper access to
<BR>> charts.........
<BR>>
<BR>> July 28, 1998
<BR>>
<BR>> Re: Dow
<BR>> I think you should go short in the current rally. Cut your
short
<BR>> position
<BR>> if the rally exceeds 70% of the recent fall from it's all-time high.
I
<BR>> think
<BR>> that a down-ward c-wave has started which will be in 5 waves.
The
<BR>> 1st wave is over and the 2nd is in progress. This 2nd wave
may
<BR>> take time to finish moving sideways or in a narrow range. The
3rd
<BR>> wave downwards will be rapid and panicky. The problem is that
<BR>> one does not know how long timewise the 2nd wave lasts. Anyway,
<BR>> this is my opinion. I may be wrong because I do not have detailed
<BR>> chart - just following day-to-day on CNN.
<BR>>
<BR>> Regards,
<BR>>
<BR>> - --------------3A7F45E9EC5E3ADDDD4BE12E
<BR>> Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<BR>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<BR>>
<BR>> <HTML>
<BR>> Hello folks,
<BR>>
<BR>> <P>Received this from a friend of mine who follows the Elliot
wave theory.
<BR>> This is just for you info.
<BR>>
<BR>> <P>He is currently travelling so doesnt have proper access to
charts.........
<BR>>
<BR>> <P><B>July 28, 1998</B><B></B>
<BR>>
<BR>> <P><B>Re: Dow</B>
<BR>> <BR><B>I think you should go short in the current rally.&nbsp;
Cut your
<BR>> short</B>
<BR>> <BR><B>position</B>
<BR>> <BR><B>if the rally exceeds 70% of the recent fall from it's
all-time high.&nbsp;
<BR>> I</B>
<BR>> <BR><B>think</B>
<BR>> <BR><B>that a down-ward c-wave has started which will be in
5 waves.&nbsp;
<BR>> The</B>
<BR>> <BR><B>1st wave is over and the 2nd is in progress.&nbsp;
This 2nd wave
<BR>> may</B>
<BR>> <BR><B>take time to finish moving sideways or in a narrow range.&nbsp;
<BR>> The 3rd</B>
<BR>> <BR><B>wave downwards will be rapid and panicky.&nbsp;
The problem is that</B>
<BR>> <BR><B>one does not know how long timewise the 2nd wave lasts.&nbsp;
Anyway,</B>
<BR>> <BR><B>this is my opinion.&nbsp; I may be wrong because
I do not have detailed</B>
<BR>> <BR><B>chart - just following day-to-day on CNN.</B>
<BR>>
<BR>> <P>Regards,</HTML>
<BR>>
<BR>> - --------------3A7F45E9EC5E3ADDDD4BE12E--
<BR>>
<BR>> ------------------------------
<BR>>
<BR>> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 23:59:20 -0500
<BR>> From: Rajesh <rajesh@xxxxxxxx>
<BR>> Subject: Advise from an Elliotician A, B , C
<BR>>
<BR>> - --------------5C852A3BF008268C7DE232E1
<BR>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
<BR>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<BR>>
<BR>> Corrective Waves= A, B, C etc ., (Downward) A= down, B= UP, C= The
most
<BR>> drastic..........
<BR>>
<BR>> Hello folks,
<BR>>
<BR>> Received this from a friend of mine who follows the Elliot wave theory.
<BR>> This is just for you info.
<BR>>
<BR>> He is currently travelling so doesnt have proper access to
<BR>> charts.........
<BR>>
<BR>> July 28, 1998
<BR>>
<BR>> Re: Dow
<BR>> I think you should go short in the current rally. Cut your
short
<BR>> position
<BR>> if the rally exceeds 70% of the recent fall from it's all-time high.
I
<BR>> think
<BR>> that a down-ward c-wave has started which will be in 5 waves.
The
<BR>> 1st wave is over and the 2nd is in progress. This 2nd wave
may
<BR>> take time to finish moving sideways or in a narrow range. The
3rd
<BR>> wave downwards will be rapid and panicky. The problem is that
<BR>> one does not know how long timewise the 2nd wave lasts. Anyway,
<BR>> this is my opinion. I may be wrong because I do not have detailed
<BR>> chart - just following day-to-day on CNN.
<BR>>
<BR>> Regards,
<BR>>
<BR>> - --------------5C852A3BF008268C7DE232E1
<BR>> Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<BR>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<BR>>
<BR>> <HTML>
<BR>> <B>Corrective Waves= A, B, C etc ., (Downward) A= down, B= UP,
C= The most
<BR>> drastic..........</B>
<BR>> <BR>&nbsp;
<BR>>
<BR>> <P>Hello folks,
<BR>>
<BR>> <P>Received this from a friend of mine who follows the Elliot
wave theory.
<BR>> This is just for you info.
<BR>>
<BR>> <P>He is currently travelling so doesnt have proper access to
charts.........
<BR>>
<BR>> <P><B>July 28, 1998</B>
<BR>>
<BR>> <P><B>Re: Dow</B>
<BR>> <BR><B>I think you should go short in the current rally.&nbsp;
Cut your
<BR>> short</B>
<BR>> <BR><B>position</B>
<BR>> <BR><B>if the rally exceeds 70% of the recent fall from it's
all-time high.&nbsp;
<BR>> I</B>
<BR>> <BR><B>think</B>
<BR>> <BR><B>that a down-ward c-wave has started which will be in
5 waves.&nbsp;
<BR>> The</B>
<BR>> <BR><B>1st wave is over and the 2nd is in progress.&nbsp;
This 2nd wave
<BR>> may</B>
<BR>> <BR><B>take time to finish moving sideways or in a narrow range.&nbsp;
<BR>> The 3rd</B>
<BR>> <BR><B>wave downwards will be rapid and panicky.&nbsp;
The problem is that</B>
<BR>> <BR><B>one does not know how long timewise the 2nd wave lasts.&nbsp;
Anyway,</B>
<BR>> <BR><B>this is my opinion.&nbsp; I may be wrong because
I do not have detailed</B>
<BR>> <BR><B>chart - just following day-to-day on CNN.</B>
<BR>>
<BR>> <P><B>Regards,</B></HTML>
<BR>>
<BR>> - --------------5C852A3BF008268C7DE232E1--
<BR>>
<BR>> ------------------------------
<BR>>
<BR>> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 23:06:20 -0500
<BR>> From: "Richard Estes" <rtestes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<BR>> Subject: Re: Telechart 2000
<BR>>
<BR>> Look at quotes Plus 2.0, 1/2 price. A better scan capability. Scanable
<BR>> funnymentals. More improvements coming soon. If I didn't use QP,
I would go
<BR>> with TC2000, which I had for years.
<BR>>
<BR>> 1-800-627-9637
<BR>> Richard Estes
<BR>>
<BR>> - -----Original Message-----
<BR>> From: Rob Cloutier <cloutier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<BR>> To: 'metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx' <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<BR>> Date: Thursday, July 30, 1998 10:21 PM
<BR>> Subject: RE: Telechart 2000
<BR>>
<BR>> >I am evaluating it now... I had used TC2000 version 3 and liked
it, but
<BR>> >the graphics did not keep up with the technology. Version
4 is real nice.
<BR>> > However, the ability to program indicators is not nearly as extensive
as
<BR>> >NetaStock. But, you get the entire database of NYSE, ASE and
OTC every
<BR>> >night. That costs about $60.00 per month. However, with
that data is
<BR>> >fundamental data, e.g. PE, etc. hard to compare the two different
<BR>> >products. My Rueters data subscription runs out in August,
so I need to
<BR>> >make a decision soon. Leaning back toward TC2000 and away
from Metastock
<BR>> >right now, but that might change...
<BR>> >
<BR>> >Rob Cloutier
<BR>> >cloutier@xxxxxxxxxxx
<BR>> >
<BR>> >-----Original Message-----
<BR>> >From: tvk2@xxxxxxxx
<BR>> >Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 1998 11:09 AM
<BR>> >To: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<BR>> >Subject: Telechart 2000
<BR>> >
<BR>> >Have you seen the ad in Investors Business Daily about Tele 2000?
<BR>> >Supposed to be a new hot-the-trot way to screen 9000 stocks in sec.
It's
<BR>> >a free trial--30 days. Will give it a go, Any comments?
T.C.
<BR>> >
<BR>> >_____________________________________________________________________
<BR>> >You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
<BR>> >Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
<BR>> >Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
<BR>> >
<BR>>
<BR>> ------------------------------
<BR>>
<BR>> End of metastock-digest V1 #210
<BR>> *******************************
<P>------------------------------
<P>End of metastock-digest V1 #211
<BR>*******************************</BLOCKQUOTE>
</HTML>
|