|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Yes, I filtered the v=0.
I checked the data and you were right for some reason all the stocks that
appeared in the scan have 0 volume for that day, probably a mistake in the
data received. I use TCPro and is fairly reliable but apparently does have
some bummers once in a while, in fact I have many charts that Worden
Brothers never ever correct for splits even though I get a new CD every
quarter. I have sent them messages with lists of stocks up to 20 but they
do not appear to bother to correct.
Jim Greening suggested to try H-L=0 which is an excellent suggestion or so
I thought until I looked at several of my scanned stocks and they also have
the same price (H,L,C) for that date.
I'll keep trying, perhaps last Friday's data from TCPro had many mistakes.
Thanks for the info, I will let you know if I get anywhere.
Bill
----------
> From: Richard Estes <rtestes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Fibs
> Date: Sunday, July 19, 1998 5:45 PM
>
> Did you filter v=0 or did you just put it in cola? if you just put it in
> cola then you get all stocks and only those with a 1 don't have volume.
>
> If you did test right check data in downloader to see what you have in
the
> volume column for WMX , etc or mutual funds.
> Richard Estes
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill G Bolumen <BOLUMENB@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sunday, July 19, 1998 1:41 PM
> Subject: Re: Fibs
>
>
> >Jim or anyone,
> >I have a database with stocks and mutual funds which Metastock reads. I
> >would like to know of a way to separate the stocks from the mutual funds
> >other than taking my time to take the 2,000 + mutual funds in the
database
> >out one by one. I tried to use the Explorer with V=0 believing that if a
> >security has no volume that it would be a mutual fund but apparently
this
> >is doing something else as it gave a ton of securities such as WMX which
> >has plenty of volume. What would be the right exploration parameters to
> >work on mutual funds only?
> >Thanks.
> >
> >----------
|