|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
>From scientivicly prooven tests, letting a monkey throughing darts accomplishes
the same results as analists are capable off. From my own and others' experiences
I know that gaining in markets is not the question, but keeping these gains is.
Previously, for about 10 years, I was quite succesfully investing based purely on
companies' fundamentals. This was not knowing anything about Bull/Bear or any
of the other markets' technical aspects.
Neither did I know how to or did I use a computer, TA or any other tools, just
companies funda's. Gaining as said was not the problem.
So, little did I know about how these prices were formed, let alone why they differed
so much over the months or years.
To help myself getting access to the science of how and why prices move as they do,
learning and experiencing, eg TA, for the next 10 years has plain added that what
was needed, on top of the Economics I have studied for wayback.
>From the above too, noticed that price as factor, does not come into this, when trying
to be succesfull, as much as Support & Resistance does. Naturally, like in the nomal
everyday life, trends come and go along with its ups and downs, some stay longer
others don't.
Bringing this back to investing to trade, not to be a trader(3 different things: investing,
trading and to be a(proff) trader), TA's undisputable and immaculate tools can provide
for trading the markets' ups and downs. A program like mutual intrest Metastock, apart
from its lengthless tools-row, can provide the needed graphics for excellent viewing the
markets+its items.
>From this using of Metastock, Equis has for its users of the Metastock+subprograms
subjects, arranged for a free and open discussioning List. For this hospitality among
other reasons, when posting or replying, any consideration of and for other "mind-frame"
users might be the least one can expect to find.
My previous mail stated nothing else than what can be found in TA-books. Also
when I for the first time read the original "simplicity"-mail, I thought the set-up to be ok.
The reason for my reply came from, to keep it within financial terms, a different angle.
My mail revieled a few facts, eg : not every Metastock user is a Profesional Trader
(trader for a living), or a trader at all. Not everyone likes to jo-jo in and out of positions.
This, was just a reaction mail on enthousiastic mails received. Mail wich weren't wrong
at all and neither was my reaction on them. Free and open discussioning of.............
So, your royal highnesses,
>From the reactions I have received so far, 3 can be considered quite abusive, wich
implies that a sensitive string has been touched, and has stopped it from any futher
normal List-discussioning. So I consider this to be the last mail on the subject.
If you cannot hack it, you should drop your pants elswhere.
Period.
By the way, Thank you all for having send in privatly your supportive mailings, glad that
many others have benefited from my earlier mailings, as I have too benefitted from yours
and other Listers mailings, and no need to abandon ship(s), from S & R levels not having
been down-broken, volumes increasing, and from around the western worlds' indexes the
up-momentum is increasing AND most former Highs have been surpassed, we're on
course for the July-Aug-Sep98 High(s). Not all of the stocks have joined though,
Nice HOT summer ahead,
Regards,
Ton Maas
Ms-IRB@xxxxxxxxx
|