[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Elliott Oscillator



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

If you can convince enough people that 33 is magic also, it will most
certainly suffice.

Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: Gwenn Aël Gautier <Gw.Gautier@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Bob Willard <bwillard@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mark Peterman <markp@xxxxxxxxxx>; zoby@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<zoby@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, February 17, 1998 11:53 AM
Subject: Re: Elliott Oscillator


>Bob Willard wrote:
>>
>> For the Fibonacci faithful:  Bill Williams, in his book "Trading Chaos",
>> suggests that he's found that 34 works a tad better than 35.
>>
>> Bob Willard
>>
>>
>
>
>Ha! Amazing, isn't it. Now how about 33?
>Does anybody know if Bill really trades for a living? I've tested about
>every technique he describes in his books and in Investor's dream, and,
>well, the numbers just don't add up somehow...
>
>[:-))
>
>Gwenn Gautier
>
>