|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<HTML><META content='"Trident 4.71.0544.0"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT face="Century Schoolbook" size=2><FONT size=2>Suggestions:
</FONT></FONT>
<P><FONT face="Century Schoolbook" size=2><FONT size=2>Using March 21 as start
date set cycle lines at 16. see how close you come to major moves on stocks and
indices.</FONT></FONT>
<P><FONT face="Century Schoolbook" size=2><FONT size=2>Start your Fan at 52 week
low. or if you count waves at bottom of wave 2. </FONT></FONT>
<P><FONT face="Century Schoolbook" size=2><FONT size=2>If you are a part of
silicon investor site. come in at the following and start reading the 1000s of
TA posts.</FONT></FONT>
<P><FONT face="Century Schoolbook" size=2><FONT size=2><A
href="http://www.exchange2000.com/~wsapi/investor/stocktalk-32";>http://www.exchange2000.com/~wsapi/investor/stocktalk-32</A>
</FONT></FONT>
<P><FONT face="Century Schoolbook" size=2><FONT size=2>Richard Estes</FONT>
<P></P>
----<BR>
<B>From: </B>Peter Lim <kimheng@xxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>
<B>To: </B>metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR>
<B>Date: </B>Saturday, June 07, 1997 9:17 PM<BR>
<B>Subject: </B>Murrey Maths & Metastock<BR>
<BR>
<HTML><BODY><FONT size=2>Admist the furor created by Murrey Maths, it would be
revealing to see how<BR>
Metastock can itself be used to analyze stocks following the method of<BR>
Murrey. While Murrey methods seemed to suggest Gann, and if Murrey Maths is<BR>
not an indicator by itself, perhaps it is time that someone can program the<BR>
techniques of Murrey into one or more simple indicators or templates in<BR>
Metastock so that anyone interested need not revert to the tedious task of<BR>
hand charting but rely on the powerful cahrting and analysis abilities of<BR>
Metastock.<BR>
<BR>
Herein lies the relevance of any stock analysis technique to Metastock-<BR>
that it can be programmable to make things faster, convenient and accurate.<BR>
As it is, the Murrey site with its charts looked interesting, and might be<BR>
telling us something--if we look deeper and be more open. Murrey Maths is a<BR>
process, much as other analysis tehniques and indicators are used in like<BR>
manner. As Metastock users, we are concerned with outcomes--our trading<BR>
bottom line. If Murrey Maths can help improve the lot of Metastock users,<BR>
which on face value the charts on the Murrey site seemed to suggest,<BR>
perhaps more dicussion is needed in an open manner typical of users of this<BR>
list.<BR>
<BR>
Just my two cents worth of opinion,<BR>
<BR>
Peter Lim<BR>
<BR>
</FONT></FONT>
</BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sat Jun 07 20:31:13 1997
Received: from smtp2.nwnexus.com by mail1.halcyon.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/10Nov96-0444PM)
id AA11147; Sat, 7 Jun 1997 20:24:03 -0700
Received: from mail.equis.com by smtp2.nwnexus.com with SMTP id AA01923
(5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxx>); Sat, 7 Jun 1997 20:23:03 -0700
Received: (from list@xxxxxxxxx) by mail.equis.com (8.7.4/8.7.3) id VAA07473; Sat, 7 Jun 1997 21:48:20 -0600
Resent-Date: Sat, 7 Jun 1997 21:48:20 -0600
Message-Id: <339A2585.59B48250@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 1997 23:22:45 -0400
From: "Gale A. Thompson" <chemtex@xxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: chemtex@xxxxxxxx
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.0b4 [en] (Win95; I)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: Richard Estes <dick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Peter Lim <kimheng@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Murrey Maths & Metastock
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
References: <199706080259.VAA28508@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-Id: <"BWGbq2.0.eq1.3kYcp"@mail.equis.com>
Resent-From: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailing-List: <metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> archive/latest/2458
X-Loop: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: metastock-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-UIDL: 90e79b865dc349ed70ded2861086da1e
Nice post Richard....
I put up EGRP in MS just for kicks and grins to try out the 16 day cycle
and the Gann Fan with the 52 week low. Everyone should look at this
one. It was the first stock I put up... Inspirational comes to mind...
-- Gt --
Richard Estes wrote:
>
> Suggestions:
>
> Using March 21 as start date set cycle lines at 16. see how close you
> come to major moves on stocks and indices.
>
> Start your Fan at 52 week low. or if you count waves at bottom of wave
> 2.
>
> If you are a part of silicon investor site. come in at the following
> and start reading the 1000s of TA posts.
>
> http://www.exchange2000.com/~wsapi/investor/stocktalk-32
>
> Richard Estes
>
> ----
> From: Peter Lim <kimheng@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Saturday, June 07, 1997 9:17 PM
> Subject: Murrey Maths & Metastock
>
> Admist the furor created by Murrey Maths, it would be revealing to see
> how
> Metastock can itself be used to analyze stocks following the method of
> Murrey. While Murrey methods seemed to suggest Gann, and if Murrey
> Maths is
> not an indicator by itself, perhaps it is time that someone can
> program the
> techniques of Murrey into one or more simple indicators or templates
> in
> Metastock so that anyone interested need not revert to the tedious
> task of
> hand charting but rely on the powerful cahrting and analysis abilities
> of
> Metastock.
>
> Herein lies the relevance of any stock analysis technique to
> Metastock-
> that it can be programmable to make things faster, convenient and
> accurate.
> As it is, the Murrey site with its charts looked interesting, and
> might be
> telling us something--if we look deeper and be more open. Murrey Maths
> is a
> process, much as other analysis tehniques and indicators are used in
> like
> manner. As Metastock users, we are concerned with outcomes--our
> trading
> bottom line. If Murrey Maths can help improve the lot of Metastock
> users,
> which on face value the charts on the Murrey site seemed to suggest,
> perhaps more dicussion is needed in an open manner typical of users of
> this
> list.
>
> Just my two cents worth of opinion,
>
> Peter Lim
|