|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<HTML><META content='"Trident 4.71.0544.0"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2><FONT size=2>That is what the variable MA is suppose
to be. Won't get into a long story. IMO: It is only useable using periods from
3-16. Suggest you work with it, I suggest 8-13 for most usage. I considered the
old pre 6.0 varMA to be the best for nearly all usage. I hope we will see it in
future upgrades.</FONT></FONT>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2><FONT size=2>Richard Estes</FONT>
<P></P>
----<BR>
<B>From: </B>Dr. E.T. Lon Luty <etlon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>
<B>To: </B>metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR>
<B>Date: </B>Sunday, April 27, 1997 8:04 PM<BR>
<B>Subject: </B>Variable Index Dynamic Average (VIDYA)<BR>
<BR>
<HTML><BODY><FONT size=2>In "THE NEW TECHNICAL TRADER" by Chande &
Kroll, a dynamic exponential<BR>
moving average (VIDYA) is introduced. It sounds intriguing.<BR>
<BR>
Does anyone have experience using VIDYA in MetaStock 6.0 - and if so -<BR>
can you share the formula and usage strategy? And, of course, what<BR>
success have you had using it. Much appreciated. Lon<BR>
</FONT></FONT>
</BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sun Apr 27 19:59:17 1997
Received: from smtp2.nwnexus.com by mail1.halcyon.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/10Nov96-0444PM)
id AA15387; Sun, 27 Apr 1997 19:54:28 -0700
Received: from mail.equis.com by smtp2.nwnexus.com with SMTP id AA13332
(5.65c/IDA-1.4.4); Sun, 27 Apr 1997 19:53:52 -0700
Received: (from list@xxxxxxxxx) by mail.equis.com (8.7.4/8.7.3) id UAA24396; Sun, 27 Apr 1997 20:54:38 -0600
Resent-Date: Sun, 27 Apr 1997 20:54:38 -0600
Message-Id: <1.5.4.32.19970428025220.006aa0f8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Sender: jhl3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 1997 21:52:20 -0500
To: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxx
From: John & Paula <jhl3@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Weekly Pick
Resent-Message-Id: <"3onQj1.0.7z5.j51Pp"@mail.equis.com>
Resent-From: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailing-List: <metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> archive/latest/1936
X-Loop: metastock-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: metastock-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-UIDL: 93cded9719eff6aae5769aa455914242
Jim,
Thanks for the market analysis. I always find what you have to say
interesting and useful.
I wonder, though, why the 85% institutional ownership of COMS doesn't
concern you. It seems to me that with such a high figure, the stock has
much more room to decline than to ascend.
|