Not sure but it would seem that if you have a limited number of LookBack values you could, using another small LookBack-loop, pre-calculate the
Ref( HHVBars( Array1, LookBack ), -1 )
arrays outside the loop and store them in dynamic named variables, then access them inside the loop with subscript.
The array function and ref() don't look right inside the loop ;-)
that's the best i can come up with.
herman
Monday, August 31, 2009, 3:01:09 PM, you wrote:
> Sorry, forgot to add a line that illustrates the iterative nature of the loop,
> LookBack = 31;
> for ( i = 1;i < 50;i++ )
> {
> c2_Posn = Ref( HHVBars( Array1, LookBack ), -1 ) + 1;
> .
> .
> .
> LookBack = c2_posn;
> }
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "sidhartha70" <sidhartha70@xxx> wrote:
>> Yes increment. Sorry.
>> Ok. Here's some code...
>> LookBack = 31;
>> for ( i = 1;i < 50;i++ )
>> {
>> c2_Posn = Ref( HHVBars( Array1, LookBack ), -1 ) + 1;
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> }
>> Now, what I actually want to do, and tried to do, is instead of the increment being '50' was to make it equal to,
>> Sum( Array_y , LookBack );
>> However, that doesn't work. If I can't make the increment variable, i.e. equal to the value of an array, the other option is to exit the loop when no more interations are required... Again, this causes a problem because I can't do something like,
>> if ( c2_Posn<4) break;
>> Any ideas...?
> ------------------------------------
> **** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
> This group is for the discussion between users only.
> This is *NOT* technical support channel.
> TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
> http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
> (submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
> For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/