|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Appologies. I managed to reproduce that.
Actually it happened not when month has 31 days, but when last
day of the month (any length) was a trading day.
Best regards,
Tomasz Janeczko
amibroker.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tomasz Janeczko" <groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 2:18 PM
Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: AmiBroker 5.27.0 ALPHA released
> Are you using 5.27.1 (*NOT* 5.27.0) ?
>
> I can't reproduce that with 5.27.1.
>
> What data source you are using ?
>
> Best regards,
> Tomasz Janeczko
> amibroker.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "haiguise" <haiguise@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 7:38 PM
> Subject: [amibroker] Re: AmiBroker 5.27.0 ALPHA released
>
>
>>
>> If you go to a monthly chart and a Month has 31 days then the charts make the 31st day as its own month. So on my charts i Have
>> 3/30/2009 then 3/31/2009 then 4/29/2009
>>
>> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Tomasz Janeczko" <groups@xxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> KNOWN ISSUES in 4.57.1 alpha:
>>> 1. The TEXT tool has a bug in 5.27.0 and 5.27.1 - newly added text is drawn vertically instead of horizontally and can not be
>>> moved. This will be fixed in 5.27.2
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Tomasz Janeczko
>>> amibroker.com
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Tomasz Janeczko
>>> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 5:02 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: AmiBroker 5.27.0 ALPHA released
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you for the report.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Tomasz Janeczko
>>> amibroker.com
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Edward Pottasch
>>> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 4:42 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: AmiBroker 5.27.0 ALPHA released
>>>
>>>
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> I am running the alpha version since this morning and sofar I did not encounter any problems.
>>>
>>> regards, Ed
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Tomasz Janeczko
>>> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 1:16 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: AmiBroker 5.27.0 ALPHA released
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Issues first, new features later.
>>> First I need to know about issues people have with alpha and
>>> fix any issues first. Very little feedback has been collected until now.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Tomasz Janeczko
>>> amibroker.com
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Julian" <juliangoodsell@xxx>
>>> To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 1:04 PM
>>> Subject: [amibroker] Re: AmiBroker 5.27.0 ALPHA released
>>>
>>> > Tomasz,
>>> >
>>> > do you have an eta on when this bid/ask data will be implemented? It's not mentioned in the release notes.
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> > Julian.
>>> >
>>> > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Tomasz Janeczko" <groups@> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hello,
>>> >>
>>> >> Sorry, but others have demanded storing Bid/Ask along with trade data so, contrary to your belief
>>> >> tick data is NOT smaller than bar data. Plus it does NOT need 44 bytes to store bar data.
>>> >> I don't know were you get this figure from. Single bar is 40 (fourty) bytes.
>>> >>
>>> >> As for tick data you get
>>> >> 64 bit date time (8 bytes), 4 bytes trade price, 4 byte trade volume, 4 byte bid, 4 byte bid size, 4 byte ask, 4 byte
>>> ask size.
>>> >> That's 32 bytes MINIMUM. There are other things that are comming as exchange code, tick number etc.
>>> >>
>>> >> So contrary to your belief tick data is not smaller than bar data.
>>> >>
>>> >> Best regards,
>>> >> Tomasz Janeczko
>>> >> amibroker.com
>>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>>> >> From: "cpescho" <cpescho@>
>>> >> To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> >> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:29 AM
>>> >> Subject: [amibroker] Re: AmiBroker 5.27.0 ALPHA released
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> > Hello,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > are there any plans to account for large tick database backtesting? 44 Bytes is great for storing a OHLC bar, but for
>>> a single
>>> >> > tick its still a lot since you dont have OHL with tick data.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Right now my biggest problem backtesting tick data is memory limitation. Wasting disk space is not my concern
>>> although
>>> i think
>>> >> > one
>>> >> > can eliminate the disk i/o bottleneck if a more compact format is stored on disk.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Regards,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Chris
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > ------------------------------------
>>> >> >
>>> >> > **** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
>>> >> > This group is for the discussion between users only.
>>> >> > This is *NOT* technical support channel.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
>>> >> > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
>>> >> >
>>> >> > TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
>>> >> > http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
>>> >> > (submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
>>> >> >
>>> >> > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
>>> >> > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ------------------------------------
>>> >
>>> > **** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
>>> > This group is for the discussion between users only.
>>> > This is *NOT* technical support channel.
>>> >
>>> > TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
>>> > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
>>> >
>>> > TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
>>> > http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
>>> > (submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
>>> >
>>> > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
>>> > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
>>> >
>>> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> **** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
>> This group is for the discussion between users only.
>> This is *NOT* technical support channel.
>>
>> TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
>> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
>>
>> TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
>> http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
>> (submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
>>
>> For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
>> http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> **** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
> This group is for the discussion between users only.
> This is *NOT* technical support channel.
>
> TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
>
> TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
> http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
> (submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
>
> For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
------------------------------------
**** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
This group is for the discussion between users only.
This is *NOT* technical support channel.
TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
(submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|