[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [amibroker] Re: AmiBroker 5.27.0 ALPHA released



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Are you using 5.27.1 (*NOT* 5.27.0) ?

I can't reproduce that with 5.27.1.

What data source you are using ?

Best regards,
Tomasz Janeczko
amibroker.com
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "haiguise" <haiguise@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 7:38 PM
Subject: [amibroker] Re: AmiBroker 5.27.0 ALPHA released


>
> If you go to a monthly chart and a Month has 31 days then the charts make the 31st day as its own month. So on my charts i Have 
> 3/30/2009 then 3/31/2009 then 4/29/2009
>
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Tomasz Janeczko" <groups@xxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> KNOWN ISSUES in 4.57.1 alpha:
>> 1. The TEXT tool has a bug in 5.27.0 and 5.27.1 - newly added text is drawn vertically instead of horizontally and can not be 
>> moved. This will be fixed in 5.27.2
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Tomasz Janeczko
>> amibroker.com
>>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>>   From: Tomasz Janeczko
>>   To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>   Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 5:02 PM
>>   Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: AmiBroker 5.27.0 ALPHA released
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>   Thank you for the report.
>>
>>   Best regards,
>>   Tomasz Janeczko
>>   amibroker.com
>>     ----- Original Message ----- 
>>     From: Edward Pottasch
>>     To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>     Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 4:42 PM
>>     Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: AmiBroker 5.27.0 ALPHA released
>>
>>
>>     hi,
>>
>>     I am running the alpha version since this morning and sofar I did not encounter any problems.
>>
>>     regards, Ed
>>
>>
>>
>>       ----- Original Message ----- 
>>       From: Tomasz Janeczko
>>       To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>       Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 1:16 PM
>>       Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: AmiBroker 5.27.0 ALPHA released
>>
>>
>>
>>       Issues first, new features later.
>>       First I need to know about issues people have with alpha and
>>       fix any issues first. Very little feedback has been collected until now.
>>
>>       Best regards,
>>       Tomasz Janeczko
>>       amibroker.com
>>       ----- Original Message ----- 
>>       From: "Julian" <juliangoodsell@xxx>
>>       To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>       Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 1:04 PM
>>       Subject: [amibroker] Re: AmiBroker 5.27.0 ALPHA released
>>
>>       > Tomasz,
>>       >
>>       > do you have an eta on when this bid/ask data will be implemented? It's not mentioned in the release notes.
>>       >
>>       > Regards,
>>       > Julian.
>>       >
>>       > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Tomasz Janeczko" <groups@> wrote:
>>       >>
>>       >> Hello,
>>       >>
>>       >> Sorry, but others have demanded storing Bid/Ask along with trade data so, contrary to your belief
>>       >> tick data is NOT smaller than bar data. Plus it does NOT need 44 bytes to store bar data.
>>       >> I don't know were you get this figure from. Single bar is 40 (fourty) bytes.
>>       >>
>>       >> As for tick data you get
>>       >> 64 bit date time (8 bytes), 4 bytes trade price, 4 byte trade volume, 4 byte bid, 4 byte bid size, 4 byte ask, 4 byte 
>> ask size.
>>       >> That's 32 bytes MINIMUM. There are other things that are comming as exchange code, tick number etc.
>>       >>
>>       >> So contrary to your belief tick data is not smaller than bar data.
>>       >>
>>       >> Best regards,
>>       >> Tomasz Janeczko
>>       >> amibroker.com
>>       >> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>       >> From: "cpescho" <cpescho@>
>>       >> To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>       >> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:29 AM
>>       >> Subject: [amibroker] Re: AmiBroker 5.27.0 ALPHA released
>>       >>
>>       >>
>>       >> > Hello,
>>       >> >
>>       >> > are there any plans to account for large tick database backtesting? 44 Bytes is great for storing a OHLC bar, but for 
>> a single
>>       >> > tick its still a lot since you dont have OHL with tick data.
>>       >> >
>>       >> > Right now my biggest problem backtesting tick data is memory limitation. Wasting disk space is not my concern although 
>> i think
>>       >> > one
>>       >> > can eliminate the disk i/o bottleneck if a more compact format is stored on disk.
>>       >> >
>>       >> > Regards,
>>       >> >
>>       >> > Chris
>>       >> >
>>       >> >
>>       >> >
>>       >> >
>>       >> > ------------------------------------
>>       >> >
>>       >> > **** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
>>       >> > This group is for the discussion between users only.
>>       >> > This is *NOT* technical support channel.
>>       >> >
>>       >> > TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
>>       >> > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
>>       >> >
>>       >> > TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
>>       >> > http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
>>       >> > (submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
>>       >> >
>>       >> > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
>>       >> > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
>>       >> >
>>       >> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>>       >> >
>>       >> >
>>       >> >
>>       >>
>>       >
>>       >
>>       >
>>       >
>>       > ------------------------------------
>>       >
>>       > **** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
>>       > This group is for the discussion between users only.
>>       > This is *NOT* technical support channel.
>>       >
>>       > TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
>>       > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
>>       >
>>       > TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
>>       > http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
>>       > (submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
>>       >
>>       > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
>>       > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
>>       >
>>       > Yahoo! Groups Links
>>       >
>>       >
>>       >
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> **** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
> This group is for the discussion between users only.
> This is *NOT* technical support channel.
>
> TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
>
> TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
> http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
> (submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
>
> For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>



------------------------------------

**** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
This group is for the discussion between users only.
This is *NOT* technical support channel.

TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to 
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com

TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
(submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)

For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/