|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "dbwyatt_1999" <dbw451@xxx> wrote:
>
> ang_60,
>
> Duplicating the symbol data for each model is actually a very interesting idea. In my case that would be 12 x 27 = 324 symbols and 12 watchlists. Is there an easy way to duplicate a symbol? If I export, copy file, rename file, import, manually type in the symbol information (tick size, margin, point value), and manually add to a watchlist, I think I'm looking at about 2 minutes labor per symbol. That would be about 11 hours of setup where it's easy to make a mistake... One little mistake can lead to much more time trying to locate mis-typed symbol information or missing symbol in watchlist...
>
> In addition to the 12 watchlists, I assume there would need to be a super-watchlist with all the symbols that would be specified for use by the portfolio back-tester.
>
> Your excellent suggestion actually gives us a way to run multiple systems simutaneously on the same instruments (via different symbol names) without worrying about scaling-in and out or simultaneous long and short trades. I now have to decide if I want to take on the labor to set it all up and verify... I've read posts in the past of people running back-tests and explorations with hundreds of symbols so I assume AB can handle 324 symbols (I know it will be hardware dependent). AB uses so little resources with 27 symbols, I'm thinking 324 should not be a problem.
>
> Many Thanks,
>
> David
>
>
David,
every solution ha s its pro's and con's.
As you know, the csv file you export from AB, is not instantly readable from MSA, you need to label every column, and this takes time too (MY time and not machine time).... and should be repeated for every test and every file.
Copying data requires time too, but.... I mostly use Metastock data format (also intraday) and use two utilities-handling data, so
- creating copies of present directories takes minutes not hours;
- it is au automated task, and so it doens't bother me how many time it si required.
The boring part is chianging the names, but this could be automated too (people thinking to write a C program, like the person starting this thread should be able to do it for breakfast) and - after all - is "una tantum".
But.... as I said, my method is just a stupid workaround.... the definitive solution has yet to come.
For the rest, I don't understand the need of a superwatchist with all the symbol, as this is simply the "ALL" symbol in the database, ... neither the need to use the CBT (nothing against with the CBT, but here it is not needed).
As for AB, I had no problem in testing 300+ symbols with more than 20 years of daily data (simple code, no loops that are time consuming). I have some problems in testing large amount of intraday data, but as I'm not sure what is the cause, I will retain myself for any further comment on this matter.
Greetings,
Angelo.
------------------------------------
**** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
This group is for the discussion between users only.
This is *NOT* technical support channel.
TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
(submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|