Barry,
They are identical on my machine.
// PPO Percentage Price Osc from
MS and AB
// Same as
MACD
T1=Param("Fast Periods",7,2,100,1);
T2=Param("Slow Periods",28,2,100,1);
PPO = 100*(EMA(C,T1) - EMA(C,T2))/ EMA(C,T2); // MS
test=OscP( T1 , T2 ) ;
Plot(PPO," MS Percentage Price Osc ",2,1);
//Plot(," AB Percentage Price Osc
",0,1);
Plot(OscP(T1,T2),"AB OscP",3,1);
//AB
//======================================
// from
http://www.amibroker.com/library/detail.php?id=1113
//
PPO X 100
PPOShort = T1;
PPOLong = T2;
//PPOsignal
= Param("PPOsignal", 9, 1, 150, 1);
PPO = (EMA(C, PPOShort ) - EMA(C, PPOLong ))/ EMA(C, PPOLong );
//PPOS = (EMA(ppo,
PPOsignal ));
//Val=ppo-PPOS
;
Plot(
PPO*100 ,
"ppo", colorGreen, styleLine| styleThick );
//Plot ( PPOS
,"PPO Signal", colorOrange, styleLine| styleThick );
//dynamic_color =
IIf( Val> 0, colorGreen, colorRed );
//Plot( Val, "PPO Histogram", dynamic_color, styleHistogram |
styleThick );
-CS
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 1:04 PM
Subject: [amibroker] Re: Newbie
here......Question about PPO
But if you plot them both and look at the values there are off even when
you multiply PPO by 100. There is something going on in OscP that makes the
results different and I haven't a clue what it is. The small difference may
not make any difference. Maybe OscP is not using EMAs. I don't know. I just
know they do not return the same results. Maybe testing both will determine if
either can be used.
Barry
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com,
"wavemechanic" <fimdot@xxx> wrote:
>
> PPO = Percentage
Price Oscillator. So, you want to deal in % and need to multiply the ema(fast)
- ema(slow)/ema(slow) by 100. OscP() already does that. If you don't want
the result in % then divide by 100. The key thing is that OscP() does the
ema() calculation. The Users Guide should make that point.
>
>
Bill
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Barry Scarborough
> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com
> Sent: May 29, 2009 12:36 PM
> Subject: [amibroker] Re: Newbie
here......Question about PPO
>
>
> OSCP and PPO are not
the same. I plotted them and they are similar but off by a factor of
100.
>
> Barry
>
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com,
"wavemechanic" <fimdot@> wrote:
> >
> > This is
nothing but the built-in function OscP().
> >
> >
Bill
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Mubashar
virk
> > To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com
> > Sent: May 26, 2009 5:07 PM
> > Subject: Re: [amibroker]
Newbie here......Question about PPO
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > please google for
"PPO+Amibroker", you will find the code.
> >
> >
> > From: bretsmiles
> > Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 6:56
AM
> > To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com
> > Subject: [amibroker] Newbie here......Question about PPO
>
>
> >
> > I do not see the PPO as an indicator in the
AFL. Does it go by another name or is something we have to create
ourselves.....Thanks in advance?
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> **** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
> This group is for the
discussion between users only.
> This is *NOT* technical support
channel.
>
> TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
>
> TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS
please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
> http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
>
(submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
>
> For
NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
__._,_.___
**** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
This group is for the discussion between users only.
This is *NOT* technical support channel.
TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
(submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
![]()
__,_._,___
|