Your IIF logic is
flawed;
You are saying that if RMO >
0, then use UpC.
If RMO is not > 0 then the
alternative (which includes a case for white) will be assigned. However, your
condition within the alternative again looks for RMO > 0, which of course
is impossible, since if it was the original would have been
selected.
Color = IIf(RMO >
0,
UpC, <--- When RMO > 0 this one will
always win
IIf((RMO > 0 AND RMO <
Ref(RMO,-1)),
colorWhite, <--- This is impossible since you are
asking for both 0 >= RMO > 0
IIf(RMO < 0 AND RMO >
Ref(RMO,-1),
DnC1,
DnC)));
Mike
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com, "Mubashar Virk"
<mvirk67@xxx> wrote:
>
> Guys, Please help. I am unable to
change the color from GREEN to WHITE (when the RMO slope down in the positive
region. Here is the whole code.
> THANKS.
>
> Len1 =
Param("ma_len1",2,2,40,1);
>
> Len2 =
Param("sum_len2",10,2,40,1);
>
> Len3 =
Param("ema_len2",30,2,100,1);
>
> Len4 = 81;
>
> //Indicators
>
> MAz = Cum(0);
>
> MAy =
C;
>
>
>
> for (i = 1; i <= Len2; i++)
>
> {
>
> MAy = MA(MAy, Len1);
>
> MAz = MAz +
MAy;
>
> }
>
> UpC = colorGreen;
>
>
DnC = colorOrange;
>
> DnC1 = colorLightBlue;
>
>
ST1 = 100 * (C - (MAz / Len2)) / (HHV(C, Len2) - LLV(C, Len2));
>
> RMO = EMA(ST1,Len4);
>
> Color = IIf(RMO > 0,
UpC, IIf((RMO > 0 AND RMO < Ref(RMO,-1)), colorWhite, IIf(RMO <
0 AND RMO > Ref(RMO,-1), DnC1, DnC)));// THE PROBLEM AREA
>
>
PlotOHLC(0,RMO,0,0, "RMO Oscillator",Color, styleCloud);
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: brian_z111
> To:
amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com
> Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 3:20
PM
> Subject: OT: Re: Re: [amibroker] Re: update Saturn uranus
opposition .
>
>
> I am not a fan of Astro Trading ...
don't know anything about but I am not a fan of excessive censorship
either.
>
> I don't have a problem with it if it is moderate and
fair.
>
> I'm cool :-)
>
> --- In
amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com, "Tomasz Janeczko" groups@ wrote:
>
>
> > Brian,
> >
> > Cool down. You may be fan
of astrology, but accept the fact that not everyone must be the same.
>
> I just asked to mark this thread as Off-Topic and I see nothing wrong
with
> > having two characters prepended to the subject line for easy
filter.
> > In my opinion it is off topic and that's it. Accept it
pretty please with sugar on top.
> >
> > Best
regards,
> > Tomasz Janeczko
> > amibroker.com
> >
----- Original Message -----
> > From: "brian_z111"
brian_z111@
> > To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com
> > Sent:
Friday, March 06, 2009 11:01 AM
> > Subject: OT: Re: [amibroker] Re:
update Saturn uranus opposition .
> >
> >
> >
>> This mailing list is to discuss AmiBroker and AmiBroker-related
>stuff.
> > >> I guess that there are other lists where you
can discuss astrology.
> > >
> > > I thought it was a
discussion on Astrological Trading, not Astrology per se, AND Natasha invited
anyone from the group to discuss
> > > AmiBroker
applications.
> > >
> > > Did you read her posts and
look at the attachments where she marked some astrologically significant
points (her defintion not
> > > mine) on an AmiBroker
chart?
> > >
> > > Isn't that ON TOPIC.
> >
>
> > > OR I am misunderstanding N's posts and the forum'
rules?
> > >
> > >> Please return to
AmiBroker-related discussion or at least clearly >mark
> >
>> your off-topic threads as OT: in the subject line as per forum
>rules,
> > >> so people can filter out off-topic subjects
automatically.
> > >
> > > I agree that it is courtesy
to mark OT as OT.
> > >
> > > However, could you
please clarify what is OT e.g. here are two of your posts ... one is a Youtube
video where US interest rates
> > > are being discussed and
another is a discussion on the US financial system and paper money.
>
> >
> > > They were both started by you and WERE NOT marked
as OT.
> > >
> > >
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/message/114069
>
> >
> > >
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/message/119088
>
> >
> > > I guess it depends on our personal viewpoint but I
think Astrological Trading, where the Hulbert digest (an independent review)
> > > ranks AstroTraders as 1 & 2out of 10, for 2008, has
more relevance to trading than commentary on economic indicators.
> >
>
> > > I notice that no one bothered to make an objective
analysis of that claim e.g. is it a one off fluke OR has an AstroTrader been
in
> > > the top ten on other occasions?
> >
>
> > > Many of the posters were too busy falling over
themselves to try to be funny that they didn't have the time to follow their
own
> > > "Law of Objective Analysis'.
> > >
>
> > Also, Amibroker has built-in drawing tools for Gann Fans and
Fibonacci and they have no scientific credibility so why single out
>
> > Astro Trading as 'allowable for forum members to make 'innocent' fun
of and post 'anus' jokes about'?
> > >
> > > My
inclination was to email the moderator asking him to take down the 'fun
poking' posts that were 'going nowhere' and
> > > collectively
intended to ridicule Natasha.
> > >
> > > Is there a
difference between ridicule and humiliation?
> > >
> >
>
> > >
> > > --- In
amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com, "Tomasz Janeczko" <groups@>
wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hello,
> >
>>
> > >> Sorry but this is OFF TOPIC discussion.
>
> >>
> > >> This mailing list is to discuss AmiBroker
and AmiBroker-related stuff.
> > >>
> > >> I
guess that there are other lists where you can discuss astrology.
> >
>>
> > >> Please return to AmiBroker-related discussion
or at least clearly mark
> > >> your off-topic threads as OT:
in the subject line as per forum rules,
> > >> so people can
filter out off-topic subjects automatically.
> > >>
>
> >>
> > >> Best regards,
> > >> Tomasz
Janeczko
> > >> amibroker.com
> > >> -----
Original Message -----
> > >> From: Natasha ~~!!!
> >
>> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com
> > >> Sent:
Friday, March 06, 2009 7:41 AM
> > >> Subject: Re: [amibroker]
Re: update Saturn uranus opposition .
> > >>
> >
>>
> > >> The top ten Paid Newsletters in order are with
gains ..
> > >> according to Hulbert .
> >
>>
> > >> 2008's Top Ten
> > >> 1.
Crawford Perspectives +42.4%
> > >> 2. Peter Eliades
Stockmarket Cycles 20.8%
> > >> 3.
> >
>>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> > >
------------------------------------
> > >
>
> > **** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
> > > This group is for
the discussion between users only.
> > > This is *NOT* technical
support channel.
> > >
> > > TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT
send an e-mail directly to
> > > SUPPORT {at}
amibroker.com
> > >
> > > TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please
use FEEDBACK CENTER at
> > >
http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
> > > (submissions sent
via other channels won't be considered)
> > >
> > >
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> >
> http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> > >
> > >
Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3911 (20090305) __________
>
> The message was checked
by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
>
http://www.eset.com
>