|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Your IIF logic is flawed;
You are saying that if RMO > 0, then use UpC.
If RMO is not > 0 then the alternative (which includes a case for white) will be assigned. However, your condition within the alternative again looks for RMO > 0, which of course is impossible, since if it was the original would have been selected.
Color = IIf(RMO > 0,
UpC, <--- When RMO > 0 this one will always win
IIf((RMO > 0 AND RMO < Ref(RMO,-1)),
colorWhite, <--- This is impossible since you are asking for both 0 >= RMO > 0
IIf(RMO < 0 AND RMO > Ref(RMO,-1),
DnC1,
DnC)));
Mike
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Mubashar Virk" <mvirk67@xxx> wrote:
>
> Guys, Please help. I am unable to change the color from GREEN to WHITE (when the RMO slope down in the positive region. Here is the whole code.
> THANKS.
>
> Len1 = Param("ma_len1",2,2,40,1);
>
> Len2 = Param("sum_len2",10,2,40,1);
>
> Len3 = Param("ema_len2",30,2,100,1);
>
> Len4 = 81;
>
> //Indicators
>
> MAz = Cum(0);
>
> MAy = C;
>
>
>
> for (i = 1; i <= Len2; i++)
>
> {
>
> MAy = MA(MAy, Len1);
>
> MAz = MAz + MAy;
>
> }
>
> UpC = colorGreen;
>
> DnC = colorOrange;
>
> DnC1 = colorLightBlue;
>
> ST1 = 100 * (C - (MAz / Len2)) / (HHV(C, Len2) - LLV(C, Len2));
>
> RMO = EMA(ST1,Len4);
>
> Color = IIf(RMO > 0, UpC, IIf((RMO > 0 AND RMO < Ref(RMO,-1)), colorWhite, IIf(RMO < 0 AND RMO > Ref(RMO,-1), DnC1, DnC)));// THE PROBLEM AREA
>
> PlotOHLC(0,RMO,0,0, "RMO Oscillator",Color, styleCloud);
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: brian_z111
> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 3:20 PM
> Subject: OT: Re: Re: [amibroker] Re: update Saturn uranus opposition .
>
>
> I am not a fan of Astro Trading ... don't know anything about but I am not a fan of excessive censorship either.
>
> I don't have a problem with it if it is moderate and fair.
>
> I'm cool :-)
>
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Tomasz Janeczko" groups@ wrote:
> >
> > Brian,
> >
> > Cool down. You may be fan of astrology, but accept the fact that not everyone must be the same.
> > I just asked to mark this thread as Off-Topic and I see nothing wrong with
> > having two characters prepended to the subject line for easy filter.
> > In my opinion it is off topic and that's it. Accept it pretty please with sugar on top.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Tomasz Janeczko
> > amibroker.com
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "brian_z111" brian_z111@
> > To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 11:01 AM
> > Subject: OT: Re: [amibroker] Re: update Saturn uranus opposition .
> >
> >
> > >> This mailing list is to discuss AmiBroker and AmiBroker-related >stuff.
> > >> I guess that there are other lists where you can discuss astrology.
> > >
> > > I thought it was a discussion on Astrological Trading, not Astrology per se, AND Natasha invited anyone from the group to discuss
> > > AmiBroker applications.
> > >
> > > Did you read her posts and look at the attachments where she marked some astrologically significant points (her defintion not
> > > mine) on an AmiBroker chart?
> > >
> > > Isn't that ON TOPIC.
> > >
> > > OR I am misunderstanding N's posts and the forum' rules?
> > >
> > >> Please return to AmiBroker-related discussion or at least clearly >mark
> > >> your off-topic threads as OT: in the subject line as per forum >rules,
> > >> so people can filter out off-topic subjects automatically.
> > >
> > > I agree that it is courtesy to mark OT as OT.
> > >
> > > However, could you please clarify what is OT e.g. here are two of your posts ... one is a Youtube video where US interest rates
> > > are being discussed and another is a discussion on the US financial system and paper money.
> > >
> > > They were both started by you and WERE NOT marked as OT.
> > >
> > > http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/message/114069
> > >
> > > http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/message/119088
> > >
> > > I guess it depends on our personal viewpoint but I think Astrological Trading, where the Hulbert digest (an independent review)
> > > ranks AstroTraders as 1 & 2out of 10, for 2008, has more relevance to trading than commentary on economic indicators.
> > >
> > > I notice that no one bothered to make an objective analysis of that claim e.g. is it a one off fluke OR has an AstroTrader been in
> > > the top ten on other occasions?
> > >
> > > Many of the posters were too busy falling over themselves to try to be funny that they didn't have the time to follow their own
> > > "Law of Objective Analysis'.
> > >
> > > Also, Amibroker has built-in drawing tools for Gann Fans and Fibonacci and they have no scientific credibility so why single out
> > > Astro Trading as 'allowable for forum members to make 'innocent' fun of and post 'anus' jokes about'?
> > >
> > > My inclination was to email the moderator asking him to take down the 'fun poking' posts that were 'going nowhere' and
> > > collectively intended to ridicule Natasha.
> > >
> > > Is there a difference between ridicule and humiliation?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Tomasz Janeczko" <groups@> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >> Sorry but this is OFF TOPIC discussion.
> > >>
> > >> This mailing list is to discuss AmiBroker and AmiBroker-related stuff.
> > >>
> > >> I guess that there are other lists where you can discuss astrology.
> > >>
> > >> Please return to AmiBroker-related discussion or at least clearly mark
> > >> your off-topic threads as OT: in the subject line as per forum rules,
> > >> so people can filter out off-topic subjects automatically.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Best regards,
> > >> Tomasz Janeczko
> > >> amibroker.com
> > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> From: Natasha ~~!!!
> > >> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >> Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 7:41 AM
> > >> Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: update Saturn uranus opposition .
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> The top ten Paid Newsletters in order are with gains ..
> > >> according to Hulbert .
> > >>
> > >> 2008's Top Ten
> > >> 1. Crawford Perspectives +42.4%
> > >> 2. Peter Eliades Stockmarket Cycles 20.8%
> > >> 3.
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > > **** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
> > > This group is for the discussion between users only.
> > > This is *NOT* technical support channel.
> > >
> > > TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
> > > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> > >
> > > TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
> > > http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
> > > (submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
> > >
> > > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> > > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3911 (20090305) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
__._,_.___
**** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
This group is for the discussion between users only.
This is *NOT* technical support channel.
TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
(submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
![]()
__,_._,___
|