|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I am not a fan of Astro Trading ... don't know anything about but I am not a fan of excessive censorship either.
I don't have a problem with it if it is moderate and fair.
I'm cool :-)
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Tomasz Janeczko" <groups@xxx> wrote:
>
> Brian,
>
> Cool down. You may be fan of astrology, but accept the fact that not everyone must be the same.
> I just asked to mark this thread as Off-Topic and I see nothing wrong with
> having two characters prepended to the subject line for easy filter.
> In my opinion it is off topic and that's it. Accept it pretty please with sugar on top.
>
> Best regards,
> Tomasz Janeczko
> amibroker.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "brian_z111" <brian_z111@xxx>
> To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 11:01 AM
> Subject: OT: Re: [amibroker] Re: update Saturn uranus opposition .
>
>
> >> This mailing list is to discuss AmiBroker and AmiBroker-related >stuff.
> >> I guess that there are other lists where you can discuss astrology.
> >
> > I thought it was a discussion on Astrological Trading, not Astrology per se, AND Natasha invited anyone from the group to discuss
> > AmiBroker applications.
> >
> > Did you read her posts and look at the attachments where she marked some astrologically significant points (her defintion not
> > mine) on an AmiBroker chart?
> >
> > Isn't that ON TOPIC.
> >
> > OR I am misunderstanding N's posts and the forum' rules?
> >
> >> Please return to AmiBroker-related discussion or at least clearly >mark
> >> your off-topic threads as OT: in the subject line as per forum >rules,
> >> so people can filter out off-topic subjects automatically.
> >
> > I agree that it is courtesy to mark OT as OT.
> >
> > However, could you please clarify what is OT e.g. here are two of your posts ... one is a Youtube video where US interest rates
> > are being discussed and another is a discussion on the US financial system and paper money.
> >
> > They were both started by you and WERE NOT marked as OT.
> >
> > http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/message/114069
> >
> > http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/message/119088
> >
> > I guess it depends on our personal viewpoint but I think Astrological Trading, where the Hulbert digest (an independent review)
> > ranks AstroTraders as 1 & 2out of 10, for 2008, has more relevance to trading than commentary on economic indicators.
> >
> > I notice that no one bothered to make an objective analysis of that claim e.g. is it a one off fluke OR has an AstroTrader been in
> > the top ten on other occasions?
> >
> > Many of the posters were too busy falling over themselves to try to be funny that they didn't have the time to follow their own
> > "Law of Objective Analysis'.
> >
> > Also, Amibroker has built-in drawing tools for Gann Fans and Fibonacci and they have no scientific credibility so why single out
> > Astro Trading as 'allowable for forum members to make 'innocent' fun of and post 'anus' jokes about'?
> >
> > My inclination was to email the moderator asking him to take down the 'fun poking' posts that were 'going nowhere' and
> > collectively intended to ridicule Natasha.
> >
> > Is there a difference between ridicule and humiliation?
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Tomasz Janeczko" <groups@> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Sorry but this is OFF TOPIC discussion.
> >>
> >> This mailing list is to discuss AmiBroker and AmiBroker-related stuff.
> >>
> >> I guess that there are other lists where you can discuss astrology.
> >>
> >> Please return to AmiBroker-related discussion or at least clearly mark
> >> your off-topic threads as OT: in the subject line as per forum rules,
> >> so people can filter out off-topic subjects automatically.
> >>
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Tomasz Janeczko
> >> amibroker.com
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: Natasha ~~!!!
> >> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 7:41 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: update Saturn uranus opposition .
> >>
> >>
> >> The top ten Paid Newsletters in order are with gains ..
> >> according to Hulbert .
> >>
> >> 2008's Top Ten
> >> 1. Crawford Perspectives +42.4%
> >> 2. Peter Eliades Stockmarket Cycles 20.8%
> >> 3.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > **** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
> > This group is for the discussion between users only.
> > This is *NOT* technical support channel.
> >
> > TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
> > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> >
> > TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
> > http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
> > (submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
> >
> > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
------------------------------------
**** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
This group is for the discussion between users only.
This is *NOT* technical support channel.
TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
(submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|