[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

OT: Re: Re: [amibroker] Re: update Saturn uranus opposition .



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Brian,

Cool down. You may be fan of astrology, but accept the fact that not everyone must be the same.
I just asked to mark this thread as Off-Topic and I see nothing wrong with
having two characters prepended to the subject line for easy filter.
In my opinion it is off topic and that's it. Accept it pretty please with sugar on top.

Best regards,
Tomasz Janeczko
amibroker.com
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "brian_z111" <brian_z111@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 11:01 AM
Subject: OT: Re: [amibroker] Re: update Saturn uranus opposition .


>> This mailing list is to discuss AmiBroker and AmiBroker-related >stuff.
>> I guess that there are other lists where you can discuss astrology.
>
> I thought it was a discussion on Astrological Trading, not Astrology per se, AND Natasha invited anyone from the group to discuss 
> AmiBroker applications.
>
> Did you read her posts and look at the attachments where she marked some astrologically significant points (her defintion not 
> mine) on an AmiBroker chart?
>
> Isn't that ON TOPIC.
>
> OR I am misunderstanding N's posts and the forum' rules?
>
>> Please return to AmiBroker-related discussion or at least clearly >mark
>> your off-topic threads as OT: in the subject line as per forum >rules,
>> so people can filter out off-topic subjects automatically.
>
> I agree that it is courtesy to mark OT as OT.
>
> However, could you please clarify what is OT e.g. here are two of your posts ... one is a Youtube video where US interest rates 
> are being discussed and another is a discussion on the US financial system and paper money.
>
> They were both started by you and WERE NOT marked as OT.
>
> http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/message/114069
>
> http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/message/119088
>
> I guess it depends on our personal viewpoint but I think Astrological Trading, where the Hulbert digest (an independent review) 
> ranks AstroTraders as 1 & 2out of 10, for 2008, has more relevance to trading than commentary on economic indicators.
>
> I notice that no one bothered to make an objective analysis of that claim e.g. is it a one off fluke OR has an AstroTrader been in 
> the top ten on other occasions?
>
> Many of the posters were too busy falling over themselves to try to be funny that they didn't have the time to follow their own 
> "Law of Objective Analysis'.
>
> Also, Amibroker has built-in drawing tools for Gann Fans and Fibonacci and they have no scientific credibility so why single out 
> Astro Trading as 'allowable for forum members to make 'innocent' fun of and post 'anus' jokes about'?
>
> My inclination was to email the moderator asking him to take down the 'fun poking' posts that were 'going nowhere' and 
> collectively intended to ridicule Natasha.
>
> Is there a difference between ridicule and humiliation?
>
>
>
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Tomasz Janeczko" <groups@xxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Sorry but this is OFF TOPIC discussion.
>>
>> This mailing list is to discuss AmiBroker and AmiBroker-related stuff.
>>
>> I guess that there are other lists where you can discuss astrology.
>>
>> Please return to AmiBroker-related discussion or at least clearly mark
>> your off-topic threads as OT: in the subject line as per forum rules,
>> so people can filter out off-topic subjects automatically.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Tomasz Janeczko
>> amibroker.com
>>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>>   From: Natasha ~~!!!
>>   To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>   Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 7:41 AM
>>   Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: update Saturn uranus opposition .
>>
>>
>>   The top ten Paid Newsletters  in order are with gains ..
>>        according to Hulbert .
>>
>>    2008's Top Ten
>>   1. Crawford Perspectives +42.4%
>>   2. Peter Eliades Stockmarket Cycles 20.8%
>>   3.
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> **** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
> This group is for the discussion between users only.
> This is *NOT* technical support channel.
>
> TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
>
> TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
> http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
> (submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
>
> For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>



------------------------------------

**** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
This group is for the discussion between users only.
This is *NOT* technical support channel.

TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to 
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com

TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
(submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)

For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/