That's OK.
Doesn't really affect me either way.
Really you would have to give me a quote and then I would have to set
out to prove whether it was verbose or factual or not etc etc.
You would have to define 'blue sky'.
That would just fill the forum with more verbosity.
brian_z
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Fred Tonetti <ftonetti@xxx> wrote:
>
> Frankly Brian I find your typically verbose comments to be neither
specific
> nor factual .
>
>
>
> If you are interested in the realm I think most of them fall into
I'd
> classify them as "blue sky"
>
>
>
> Was that specific and/or factual enough ?
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf
> Of brian_z111
> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 2:37 AM
> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [amibroker] Re: The best way to help newbies, oldies, ...
and
> AmiBroker ...
>
>
>
> I am not overheated.
>
> If people want to start a post with YaDa YaDa I might not always
> smile and say nothing, as in the past.
>
> I am not discussing many of the points he raised.
>
> Where his points touch on mine they are too much of a motherhood
> statement to allow for a useful reply.
>
> My comments are factual... search the record of his posts... count
> how many that are there to answer, or help others, or something
else.
>
> If you want to discuss another topic start the thread.
>
> Do you think we need forum policemen to decide what topics are
> permitted or vet them to see if they are actually trading related?
> It seems to me that >90% of the time the forum regulates itself, in
> that regard, quite well.
>
> brian_z
>
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com>
ps.com, Fred
> Tonetti <ftonetti@> wrote:
> >
> > Specifics ?
> >
> >
> >
> > You need to have some of the Kool-Aide your passing out
> >
> >
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com>
ps.com
> [mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com>
ps.com]
> On Behalf
> > Of brian_z111
> > Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 1:14 AM
> > To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com>
ps.com
> > Subject: [amibroker] Re: The best way to help newbies,
oldies, ...
> and
> > AmiBroker ...
> >
> >
> >
> > No, you listen.
> >
> > You are the one who is off topic... your answers are not even
close
> > to the issues that I am discussing.... they are all big issues
> > statements ... something that we have had enough of already....
why
> > don't you focus on the specifics.
> >
> > Also, I have 'answered' 100's of questions in this forum.
> > participated in nearly every discussion on 'training' that has
come
> > up in the last two years ... confined most of my discussion to
> > constructive input i.e. suggestions that are pragmatic and can
> > actually be implemented etc.
> >
> > (You can debate the value of my answers if you like).
> >
> > I also put 100's of free hours into the experimental community
> > project, the UKB.
> >
> > You will also find that I barely ever ask for help myself (I like
> to
> > stand on my own feet and learn the lessons that come from that).
> >
> > As far as I can recall you have barely answered a question
anywhere.
> >
> > > 8) In this Yahoo Forum, there seems to be too much complaining,
> > > whining, Off-Topic, "Touchy/Feely", and narcissistic
posts but
not
> > > enough "On Topic" subjects.
> >
> > What a joke.... as I recall around 90% of your posts are
complaints
> > about someone elses posts.
> >
> > Have you ever started a topic, with a view to learning someting
or
> > helping others learn something.... let alone stayed in it and had
> to
> > account for your previous posts ... I don't recall any.
> >
> > Narcissism?
> >
> > Well if you can find any examples in my posts I will be happy to
> > reform... if you think my 'deeper' posts have anything to
> do 'abormal
> > self admiration' you are very much mistaken.
> >
> > Come on... I dare you.... start your own thread and show us
> something
> > that you actually stand for.
> >
> > > TJ, I may not be your favorite customer but I appreciate you as
> much
> > > as any of the others.
> >
> > That is just what we need right now.... a few score threads from
> > people expressing their undying love for Tomasz... very helpful
for
> > newcomers.
> >
> > brian_z
> >
> > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com>
> ps.com,
> > "Phsst" <phsst@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > Also, under context, I should have said that in the past
you
> have
> > > > stood your ground on many issues and I have stood mine....
in
> > > > hindsight you were often correct and I didn't see it at the
> time
> > > > because of my inexperience.
> > >
> > > Ya Da Ya Da...
> > >
> > > Listen,
> > >
> > > I've been an Ab customer for a heck of a long time and I've had
my
> > > "exchanges" with TJ.
> > >
> > > But no one can dispute the following facts:
> > >
> > > 1) There is no other software package on the market that can
match
> > > AB's capabilities.
> > >
> > > 2) If MetaStock or TradeStation or any other commercial
software
> > could
> > > even approach the capabilities of AB, it would cost hundreds of
> > times
> > > what AB costs.
> > >
> > > 3) TJ runs a two man shop which accounts for the reasonable
price
> of
> > > his product. (And when I say "reasonable"... that is
an
> > understatement.)
> > >
> > > 4) As Investors/Traders, we try to measure "Risk/Reward"...
but
> as
> > AB
> > > customers we have to measure "Feature/Functionality",
and TJ
has
> the
> > > competition beat.
> > >
> > > 5) The documentation is available even if it might be
"research
> > > intensive" or "thought provoking".
> > >
> > > 6) AB may be a little too advanced for some users to grasp...
so
> for
> > > those who are challenged beyond their abilities, you either
need
> to
> > > lower your expectation levels or pay someone like Graham to
help
> > you out.
> > >
> > > 7) AB requires "abilities", and that includes
everything from
> math,
> > > logic, programming, syntax, debugging, etc.
> > >
> > > 8) In this Yahoo Forum, there seems to be too much complaining,
> > > whining, Off-Topic, "Touchy/Feely", and narcissistic
posts but
not
> > > enough "On Topic" subjects.
> > >
> > > 9) Forgive my spelling, but it is late and I don't want to
spend
> the
> > > time spell checking.
> > >
> > >
> > > TJ, I may not be your favorite customer but I appreciate you as
> much
> > > as any of the others.
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > >
> > > "He who shall not be named"
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _____
> >
> > I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
> > It has removed 535 spam emails to date.
> > Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
> > Try SPAMfighter <http://www.spamfigh
<http://www.spamfighter.com/len>
> ter.com/len> for free now!
> >
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
> I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
> It has removed 535 spam emails to date.
> Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
> Try SPAMfighter <http://www.spamfighter.com/len>
for free now!
>