|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
OK, thx for clarifying. Perhaps I've been a bit to strict on this
point-of-order, i.e. nothing personal. Find your contributions
useful, and your background interesting.
Indeed, enufsaid.
PS
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "sidhartha70" <sidhartha70@xxx>
wrote:
>
> PS,
>
> To put your mind at rest, my requests were submitted via the
feedback
> centre before this thread started... #1517 & #1512.
>
> Now, lets not waste anymore screen space on this!
>
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "vlanschot" <vlanschot@> wrote:
> >
> > Actually I did, and my reaction is as much aimed at TJ as others.
My
> > argument is valid: this thread has become a growing list of
requests
> > and suggestions. It should have/be moved as OT. I'm not making
the
> > rules of engagement for this group, I'm just pointing them out to
> > keep some order. This should be TJ's responsibility.
> >
> > PS
> > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "sidhartha70" <sidhartha70@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > PS...
> > >
> > > If you'd read the thread from the beginning you'd realise this
was
> > > never meant as a discussion about 'requesting features'. The
title
> > of
> > > the thread is obvious. The reason it went 'off on a tangent' is
> > > excatly because TJ intervened and REQUESTED feedback on charting
> > > features. Please read the FULL thread before pulling the
trigger.
> > >
> > > Now, back to the original topic...
> > >
> > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "vlanschot" <vlanschot@>
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > And there you have it. . . The most important statement of
this
> > whole
> > > > discussion: the FEEDBACK centre is the place where each and
> > everyone
> > > > of us can submit their "request". I find it very annoying
that
> > some
> > > > people somehow think that their request should get more
attention
> > > > than others, and decide to post/discuss it in this group.
Imagine
> > > > what would happen if we all think like that. Also, having the
> > > > pretention to think that you somehow can categorize and rank
how
> > > > people (should) use AB and prioritize enhancements . . .
> > Ridiculous.
> > > > If you want change, vote for it at the FBC or pay for it.
> > > >
> > > > PS
> > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Tomasz Janeczko" <groups@>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I appreciate all suggestions and there is really no problem
> > > > > in adding new features provided that there is demand for
them.
> > > > > I specifically asked for charting suggestions, as this is
way
> > > > > more "subjective" thing than backtesting and other rule-
based
> > tools.
> > > > > Discretionary traders seem to be very sensitive to all those
> > > > > little details and aesthetics. These are are sometimes easy
to
> > > > develop
> > > > > sometimes not, but unless you hear the feedback it is not
> > possible
> > > > > to know what every single person uses.
> > > > > So again, feedback is appreciated. If possible and not too
time
> > > > consuming
> > > > > for you, I greatly appreciate filling the issue via
feedback
> > > > center. If not,
> > > > > I can keep track on my internal list.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > Tomasz Janeczko
> > > > > amibroker.com
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "sidhartha70" <sidhartha70@>
> > > > > To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 5:30 PM
> > > > > Subject: [amibroker] Re: 'Rule Based'
versus 'Discretionary'
> > > > trading...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > How97,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I agree. You've stated nothing that I haven't already.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I do use other software... MarketDelta & have been
looking at
> > > > Ninja
> > > > > > with a market profile plug in as an alternative.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Like others, I'm not desperately keen on using multiple
> > software
> > > > > > systems. I'd rather try and get it under one roof. And
the
> > truth
> > > > is it
> > > > > > really wouldn't be hard for TJ to add some of that
> > functionality.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm adding my voice to a largely dominant rule based
crowd...
> > I
> > > > hope
> > > > > > you're ok with free expression of wishes and ideas...??
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think others have also made it clear on this thread
that
> > they'd
> > > > like
> > > > > > to see some more functionality on the charting side too.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "how97" <101.158294@>
wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I believe it is clear that the large majority of the AB
> > users
> > > > want
> > > > > >> to have the possibility for rule-based trading,
backtesting,
> > > > > >> automatic analysis, automatic trading etc. For that
group
> > > > Amibroker
> > > > > >> is just excellent and it is constantly enhanced in these
> > > > > >> possibilities. And that is what the large majority of
its
> > users
> > > > > >> wants. And AB strongly supported by its users and driven
by
> > > > their
> > > > > >> wishes.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> The large majority of users is clearly not the
discretionary
> > > > > >> traders. These may need better or specialized charting.
That
> > may
> > > > > >> well be. If this better charting software exists already
as
> > you
> > > > are
> > > > > >> saying, why are you not using it, why did you come here
to
> > AB?
> > > > What
> > > > > >> were you looking for?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I think it is also a clear preference of Tomasz to
develop
> > AB
> > > > into a
> > > > > >> direction where most of its users wants to ahve it. And
that
> > is
> > > > > >> good. A lot of the stuff in AB is much too complex if
you
> > are
> > > > just
> > > > > >> looking for other kinds of charting. So why bother? You
need
> > to
> > > > use
> > > > > >> a different software.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> By the way: In my opinion AB allows excellent charting.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Regards
> > > > > >> how97
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "sidhartha70"
> > <sidhartha70@>
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > From my perspective, and this is really why I
connected
> > > > charting to
> > > > > >> > the ideas of 'rule based' vs 'discretionary'
trading... if
> > you
> > > > are
> > > > > >> a
> > > > > >> > discretionary trader, from a software perspective it
is
> > ALL
> > > > about
> > > > > >> > visibility. If the software you are using doesn't or
can't
> > > > give you
> > > > > >> > the best visibility available then you are at a
> > disadvanatge.
> > > > You
> > > > > >> > can't make sensible discretionary trading decisions
> > without
> > > > being
> > > > > >> able
> > > > > >> > to see how current market structure has evolved, what
> > market
> > > > > >> dynamics
> > > > > >> > are at play, how the auction process is evolving at
> > different
> > > > time
> > > > > >> > frames etc..etc.. You simply don't get that from bar &
> > candle
> > > > > >> charts.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Hence my obsession with Market Profile & Equivolume
and
> > > > generally
> > > > > >> more
> > > > > >> > accessability and adaptability to AmiBroker's charting
> > > > facilicites.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Currently it's a fabulous piece of software,
particualrly
> > > > for 'rule
> > > > > >> > based' traders.... But probably a less fabulous piece
of
> > > > software
> > > > > >> for
> > > > > >> > discretionary day traders for example. But of course,
I
> > > > appreciate,
> > > > > >> > it's hard to be all things to all men...
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ken Close
<ken45140@>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > One simple suggestion for charting improvement:
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Put in the ability to insert a "Tab" character in a
> > Title
> > > > > >> statement
> > > > > >> > in order
> > > > > >> > > to make it easier to produce multi-line tables
> > > > with "columns"
> > > > > >> left
> > > > > >> > justified
> > > > > >> > > no matter how many decimal places in previous values
in
> > the
> > > > same
> > > > > >> row. I
> > > > > >> > > have done it via complex IIF statements but how nice
it
> > > > would be
> > > > > >> to
> > > > > >> > insert
> > > > > >> > > the code for a tab character to create columns. No,
I
> > do
> > > > not
> > > > > >> want to do
> > > > > >> > > this with the gfx commands (too complex for this
> > > > application).
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Ken
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > >> > > From: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > >> [mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > > > >> > On Behalf
> > > > > >> > > Of Tomasz Janeczko
> > > > > >> > > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 4:33 PM
> > > > > >> > > To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > >> > > Subject: Re: [amibroker] 'Rule Based'
> > versus 'Discretionary'
> > > > > >> trading...
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Hello,
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Not wanting to hijack this thread but whenever I ask
> > about
> > > > some
> > > > > >> itemized
> > > > > >> > > list of what is exactly "weak" in AB charting, I
don't
> > > > receive
> > > > > >> any
> > > > > >> > > meaningful reply. I would really want to know some
> > objective
> > > > list
> > > > > >> > instead of
> > > > > >> > > statements I heard on ET that "charts are ugly"
which
> > for me
> > > > > >> > unfortunatelly
> > > > > >> > > means nothing, considering the hunderds of ways
charts
> > can
> > > > be
> > > > > >> customized
> > > > > >> > > according to user taste in AB.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please note that this group is for discussion between
users
> > only.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail
directly
> > to
> > > > > > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check
> > DEVLOG:
> > > > > > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For other support material please check also:
> > > > > > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
> > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
------------------------------------
Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|