----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 12:30
PM
Subject: RE: [amibroker] Optimizing
Rotational - Curious Result
I
stopped the optimization after several minutes. The est time was increasing as
I watched.
TJ
said this was a trivial case which the cmae was not designed
for.
But did the cmae approach actually increase or
decrease the time when you ran it?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 9:19
AM
Subject: [amibroker] Optimizing
Rotational - Curious Result
I thought this was a
curious development---I wondered if it was possible to optimize a rotational
model. Of course it is.
To test, I stuck three
variables into a fairly long afl code (complex positionscore
calculations).
Raw optimization said
75 steps, estimated time ~ 4 minutes.
I added the cmae engine
statement at the beginning and the optimize screen said 9662 steps with est
time of ~ 6 hours.
I thought the "cmae"
optimization step would decrease time, not increase the time so
dramatically.
What do you think was
going on?
Have any of you
optimized a rotational strategy?
Ken