|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Jan,
You can definitely develop the intuition, by exercising it and
listening to it, without the need to philosophise on the subject.
It is my lot in life (dharma) to understand the mechanics so I can
help others along.
Having used it as a crutch for a long time I find it very reliable.
It seems to function in different ways though e.g. in some cases you
can dynamically 'read the now' and in other cases it gives me answers
to complex, long term questions bit by bit (with a big 'question' it
will often make a quantum leap to the answer and do it at a later and
unexpected time).
On the big issues, where the consequences are important, I take the
answers as probabalistic - I give it. say, 90% accuracy - later if I
get a confirmation from another intuitive angle I increase to 95% and
of course if logic 'confirms' I am as sure as the Bank Of England.
Since trading is a probabalistic event, and mechanical traders can't
mathematically achieve certainty anyway, we don't need to worry about
the fact that our 'intuitive' trades may not be 100% correct -
especially since we have stops in place and we aren't going to die if
we have a losing trade.
brian_z
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Jan Malmberg" <jan@xxx> wrote:
>
> Brian,
>
>
>
> "Jan disgreed with me, that intuition was the faculty that some
> traders claim they use"
>
>
>
> I simply disagreed with you telling me that it was intuition in my
case, not
> disagreeing that other traders use or claim to use intuition.
>
>
>
> I have also started a study of my intuitive hunches recently. They
have
> proven to be extremely profitable. I am thinking about how to tap
into more
> of it without adding noise, and destroying the flow. Perhaps it
really is
> the flow. I do not know.
>
>
>
> Best regards / JM
>
>
>
> _____
>
> Från: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
För
> brian_z111
> Skickat: den 6 augusti 2008 02:04
> Till: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Ämne: Re: SV: SV: [amibroker] Anyone actually making money?
>
>
>
> Howard is on the record as saying something to the effect
> that "designing our own systems, using an objective function, takes
> care of the psychological aspects of trading (eliminates them?)".
>
> Barry has recently said the same thing about AT, in this forum, as
> does Herman today.
>
> A lot of people would agree with that.
> It is a positive belief, and simplicity personified so it meets my
> personal criteria on those two counts.
>
> I dare say it is an argument that may well win the day.
>
> Personally I have an open mind on the subject.
>
> I wonder, however, if 'we' are free from psychological factors when
> we make our decision to AT in the first place OR when we are
> comfortably sleeping while our computer trades our account for us
OR
> when we categorise people who don't autotrade as "living in the
last
> millenium"?
>
> > Wow, if I ever had to worry about all that stuff
> > I don't think I'd ever pull the trigger on a trade.
>
> I didn't advocate it as a pre-requisite.
> I am not aware of anyone who has, although I think there are a few
> out there who do (I seem to recall that some of the fathers
> of 'Positive Thinking' were devout Christians though).
>
> To focus the discussion a little more ....
>
> Mark Douglas "Trading In The Zone" is a well read book (?) and
> probably the source of the term "in the zone" that seems to have
> found its way into the traders lexicon.
>
> To quote:
>
> "The essence of what it means to be in "the zone" is that your
> mind and the market are in sync. As a result, you sense what the
> market
> is about to do as if there is no separation between yourself and the
> collective consciousness of everyone else participating in the
market.
> The zone is a mental space where you are doing more than just
reading
> the collective mind, you are also in complete harmony with it."
>
> This is the point we are debating isn't it?
>
> I am still thinking about that one but to set the record straight
(to
> help the traders who are interested in this viewpoint).
>
> I said that this is very similar to intuition (refer to your
Webster
> dictionary and you will see what I mean).
>
> I have some personal experience with intuition so I feel qualified
to
> comment.
> It is a normal psychological function, that a significant
percentage
> of the population have, but it is often not that well used or
> understood by them because it is kept suppressed in our culture.
>
> Since inituiton is in fact the 4th, out of 7 levels of
consciousness
> that we are capable of experiencing (levels that in the past have
> only been experienced temporarily or by accident, drugs or
spiritual
> practices) I went on to fill in some contextual information about
it.
>
> Definitely the intuitive faculties can be enhanced - the fact of
> being aware of them and using them will strengthen them just like
> excersing with an atrophied muscle.
>
> I am not that certain about its applicability to trading.
>
> There are no scientific studies, on the subject, that I am aware of
> and IMO it is a subjective judgement that the proponents of this
> style are making.
>
> Jan disgreed with me, that intuition was the faculty that some
> traders claim they use, so I went on to point out that it would be
> much more common, and easy, for succesful traders to program their
> subconscious mind by focus (removing trading distractions, keeping
it
> simple), isolating the key skills and practising them repetitively
> (pracise makes perfect).
>
> IMO that is what a lot of traders do, whether they know it or not.
>
> I then pointed out that this was not using the intuition, or any
> special state of consciousness above and beyond the lower three
> (mind, emotion, body).
>
> The reason I did that is because if people are going to 'use' these
> advanced psychological techniques they should learn something about
> what they are doing and not get them mixed up or use a technique
that
> isn't applicable for that level of the psyche.
>
> So, to be clear about it:
>
> I am advocating positively programming the trading alter ego since
it
> is safe, effective and achieveable by all (it doesn't rely on
> the 'doubtful' intuition or require any hard to acquire knowledge
or
> particularly difficult practices).
>
> I don't know how this applies to people who move to AT.
> It definitely isn't as relevant.
> Perhaps they feel their computer is the 'postively programmed
trading
> alter ego' and that it can do a better job of it than they can do
> themselves.
>
> You will have to ask them about the psychology of AT trading but as
I
> said already they will probably say there is no such thing.
>
> brian_z
>
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com>
ps.com,
> "dave_88_1961" <dave_88_1961@>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Wow, if I ever had to worry about all that spirituality,
> psychology,
> > philosophy, Indian spiritual philosophy,
> >
> > God, yoga, meditation, prayer, singing/chanting, dancing,
spiritual
> > practices,
> >
> > temporary intimacy with the Gods, psyhic powers, Western
> spirituality,
> > and spiritual teachings,
> >
> > I don't think I'd ever pull the trigger on a trade. Am I alone on
> this
> > or is this the way everybody trades in the new millennium ?
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com>
ps.com,
> "brian_z111" <brian_z111@> wrote:
> >
> > > FTR
> > > I don't know how people can tranlate this into applied Trading
> > > Psychology but to set the record straight.
> > >
> > > Re the relevance of spirituality/personal development to
trading:
> > >
> > > Using Indian spiritual philosophy as the example.
> > >
> > > There is no single philosophy but rather a myriad of inter-
related
> > > and sometimes conflicting ones.
> > > However, as a generalisation, the ideals of Indian spirituality
> are
> > > passive (to a Westerner) and can be summarised as:
> > >
> > > - Man is a small replica of God (potentially)
> > > - the goal is to sublimate the mind of Man to the mind of God
> (Yoga
> > > is the union of Man-God)
> > > - various practices are used to faclitate this (meditation,
> prayer,
> > > singing/chanting, dancing etc)
> > > - permanancy of the union is a long and difficult goal, seldom
> > > achieved
> > > - temporary intimacy with the Gods, achieved via spiritual
> practices,
> > > TRANSFORMS the practitioner and hence their culture
> > > - psyhic powers (Siddhi) are a byproduct and considered a
> distraction
> > > and/or dangerous
> > > - worldly success is considered somewhat of lesser value than
> > > spiritual success
> > >
> > > "From the Unreal lead me to the Real".
> > >
> > > Once again these are gross simplifications which have been
> vigorously
> > > debated for thousands of years.
> > >
> > > Western spirituality is active.
> > > We seek to "petition the Lord" to intervene in our
lifes/culture
> and
> > > to give us the Power(s), ostensibly to do his work.
> > >
> > > In both cases the spiritual path is the same, except that the
> > > emphasis is different, however all variations on the theme are
> > > operative in both cultures, via their sub-cultures.
> > >
> > >
> > > Applying this to trading:
> > >
> > > Will adopting spiritual practices, say meditation, or prayer,
> make me
> > > a better trader?
> > >
> > > Is there any correspondence between the transcendental
> consciousness
> > > of meditation/prayer and the mindset that successful traders
have
> > > (assuming there is such a thing as a common identifiable traders
> > > mindset)?
> > >
> > > Possibly.
> > >
> > > In my own experience, if I had any advantages in this area when
I
> > > started out trading i.e. I did "know myself" before I started
> > > trading, I still had to get to know the markets, TA, my broker,
> data
> > > provider and software etc as well.
> > >
> > >
> > > Re 'Positive Thinking' and 'The Power of The Mind'
> > >
> > > This has been borrowed from spiritual teachings (power of
Prayer
> etc).
> > >
> > > This is an application of a limited part of spirituality, and
> without
> > > the attendant ethics etc it can bring about Worldly Success but
> that
> > > doesn't neccessarily equate to Life Success i.e. it is a partial
> > > spiritual practice without the full experience or spiritual
> knowledge.
> > >
> > >
> > > Is there a mindset that successful traders have (as claimed by
> Mark
> > > Douglas "In The Trading Zone")?
> > >
> > > Possibly, or Mark could have just found a good way to make some
> money
> > > OR be projecting his personal needs/worldview onto the trading
> world.
> > >
> > > As a hypothesis (a lot of traders say that trading changed the
way
> > > they think i.e trading changed THEM).
> > >
> > > In my experience we tend to:
> > >
> > > - spend more and more time alone in the trading room
> > > - spend less and less time 'socialising'
> > > - spend long hours focused on single issues
> > > - our trading rooms are sensory deprived environments
> > > - undertake intensive problem solving/creative tasks
> > > - are confronted by our extreme emotional states etc
> > >
> > > It is possible that intense traders could eperience trading as
> > > personally transformative under those conditions and that they
do
> > > experience, or even cultivate, altered consciousness (to some
> extent)
> > > while actively engaged in trading.
> > >
> > > Based on the above is there anything we can do to facilitate
> trading
> > > success?
> > >
> > > Sticking my neck out I predict super succesful traders would
have
> > > some of the following habits/qualities:
> > >
> > > - they use positive thinking, either consciously or otherwise
> (they
> > > almost certainly set goals)
> > > - they have self-confidence or self-esteem (if they don't have
it
> > > when they start out they acquire it)
> > > - they are psychologically mature & comfortable in their skins
> > > (through other life experiences - not necessarily only acquired
> > > through academic success)
> > > - at some time in their life they have read or thought about the
> > > psychology of life/trading but it is not really a prominent
part
> of
> > > their daily thinking (they tend to do it rather than think
about
> it)
> > > - they are not very concerned with defining their style or over
> > > defining their trading
> > > - they have rituals (the way the office is setup, the time of
the
> day
> > > they do certain things) and they do things in order (download
> data,
> > > scan, add to watchlist etc )
> > > - they have one trade that they do over and over (probably they
> have
> > > some spare trades up their sleeve)
> > > - they have practised their one trade over and over (like a golf
> > > swing == 10000 repetitions)
> > > - they will be biased to simplicity and only add complexity
where
> > > they are forced to
> > > - if they have more than one trade they will use it in a
different
> > > time and place (unless it is part of a portfolio approach)
> > > - they don't consider their trade perfect i.e. others might have
> > > something better but it works for them and they are satisfied
> with it
> > > - their trade is very personal (like a favourite son or
daughter)
> > > - possibly they don't like to talk about trading, even the
> extroverts
> > > probably become trading introverts (the trading ego is like an
> alter
> > > ego that they put on and take off as they enter and leave the
> trading
> > > room)
> > > - they don't like interruptions while trading
> > > - trading talk is noise to them
> > > - they are not as interested in buying things as they used to be
> > > except stuff for their trading environment (new computers,
> software
> > > etc)
> > >
> > > Anybody recognise themselves in there anywhere?
> > >
> > > On a slightly different note:
> > >
> > > It is rather funny logic that we would think that all of the
> traders
> > > who are 'in the zone' are discretionary traders and that all of
> the
> > > other traders don't have the right stuff OR that there is only
> > > discretionary trading versus mechanical trading.
> > >
> > > Anyway, any trader who is consistently successful has the right
> > > mindset even if they/we can't define it.
> > >
> > > BTW I am not an authority on anything I just aim to share some
> > > opinions that others may find authoritive if there is any truth
in
> > > them.
> > >
> > > brian_z *:-)
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com>
ps.com,
> "brian_z111" brian_z111@ wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Jan,
> > > >
> > > > 100,000 repetitions indeed!
> > > >
> > > > Quite correct.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > However on the subject of 'mindNOT' and Samadhi etc.
> > > >
> > > > There are a lot of misconceptions floating around in the
> > > west/modern
> > > > culture, on these subjects, because of the mis-interpretation
of
> > > the
> > > > spiritual tenents of our BROTHERS OF THE EAST by unqualified
and
> > > > unauthorised 'teachers'.
> > > >
> > > > There is a dirth of true spiritual teachers in the West, for
> > > reasons
> > > > that I won't go into.
> > > >
> > > > You are mixing up two different principles.
> > > >
> > > > In symbolic terms:
> > > >
> > > > CONSCIOUSNESS wears the CROWN.
> > > > The objective NOT is the subjective ALL (THE LOGOS).
> > > >
> > > > You are confusing the "Son of God" with our "Heavenly Father"
> > > >
> > > > In general Kharma Yoga is the method for the west/modern
> culture ==
> > > > the SOUL as an active principle == GOOD WORKS
> > > >
> > > > Pragmatically:
> > > >
> > > > Don't be concerned about NoMind - it is not for most of us -
a
> very
> > > > abstract subject beyond the ken of the majority.
> > > >
> > > > NoMind != mindlessness
> > > >
> > > > You can't achieve it because it is not there to be achieved
in
> the
> > > > way that you are conceiving it.
> > > >
> > > > Intuition is what we should be concerned with.
> > > >
> > > > Intuition is not mind reading OR an inferior psychic faculty
> i.e.
> > > > inferior to the Concete Mind (objective logic).
> > > > It is not the sixth sense, although we experience it as if it
> is.
> > > > It should be more correctly known as super-rationality.
> > > > It is our higher mind (also know as the Higher Self, the
> OverSoul,
> > > > The Solar Angel, Abstract Mind, Manas).
> > > > It bridges the gap between Heaven and Earth.
> > > >
> > > > In trading it is most appropriately used along the lines
> > > of 'positive
> > > > thinking', the 'power of the mind', 'untapped levels of
> > > > consciousness' etc which is the popular form of it in the USA
> where
> > > > it is a pseudo-religion (the reason for that is that it is so
> > > aligned
> > > > to the methods that are appropriate for the times).
> > > >
> > > > These methods are safe to use but it is very unfortunate if
the
> > > > admonition to do GOOD WORKS doesn't accompany them.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > In your case; you and your trading are working well and if it
> ain't
> > > > broke don't fix it.
> > > >
> > > > Forget your search for the spiritual Holy Grail of NoMind -
> that is
> > > > an impossible dream because it doesn't exist.
> > > >
> > > > I wouldn't worry about your personal spiritual welfare - you
> seem
> > > to
> > > > be sitting quite pretty.
> > > >
> > > > brian_z *:-)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%
40yahoogroups.com>
> ps.com, "Jan Malmberg" <jan@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Well, I had 6 years of martial arts training, where I
> understood
> > > > (but
> > > > > unfortunately not yet attained) the principle of "no-mind"
> when
> > > > executing
> > > > > tasks. I have also had some limited time as a military
> > > instructor,
> > > > and it
> > > > > became obvious that during patrol and combat, when people
> fire at
> > > > you
> > > > > (blanks and smoke grenades, but still), there ones who make
it
> > > are
> > > > the ones
> > > > > who do not take the time to think.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > However, ones ability to enter this state of mind is
> dependent on
> > > > having
> > > > > enough training so that you subconsciously know that you
> really
> > > do
> > > > not have
> > > > > to think about how to move and shoot properly.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Of the Tekki Shodan pattern, the ancient warriors said
> something
> > > to
> > > > the
> > > > > effect of "Most patterns require at least 10 000 executions
> > > before
> > > > being
> > > > > mastered. However, you should not even consider
demonstrating
> > > Tekki
> > > > Shodan
> > > > > to your master before you have had 100 000 repetitions."
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > It is interesting to note that to reach the original state
of
> > > mind
> > > > while
> > > > > carrying out un-natural activities, you do need lots of
> training,
> > > > and that
> > > > > some things in every field are a lot more difficult than the
> > > > average task in
> > > > > that skill set.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards / JM
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _____
> > > > >
> > > > > Från: amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%
40yahoogroups.com>
> ps.com
> > > [mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%
40yahoogroups.com> ps.com]
> > > > För
> > > > > brian_z111
> > > > > Skickat: den 1 augusti 2008 05:32
> > > > > Till: amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%
40yahoogroups.com>
> ps.com
> > > > > Ämne: Re: SV: [amibroker] Anyone actually making money?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > 3. Level of spiritual attainment.
> > > > >
> > > > > Semantics plays a part in any discussion, especially when
we
> are
> > > > > crossing cultures etc. It plays a greater role
in 'spiritual'
> > > > > discussion than it does in any other.
> > > > >
> > > > > So, first the semantics.
> > > > >
> > > > > We are not limited to the term 'spirituality' as we can talk
> > > around
> > > > > the same area in many different terms (objective
> mind/subjective
> > > > > mind, rational/intuitive, super-consciousness, super-
> rationality
> > > > the
> > > > > collective unconscious, God, the Soul, the Divine, the
Supreme
> > > and
> > > > > millions more).
> > > > >
> > > > > For ease of discussion I will stick with 'spirituality'.
> > > > >
> > > > > A few basic points:
> > > > >
> > > > > - generally the 'spiritual gene' is latent in humanity,
across
> > > all
> > > > > cultures
> > > > > - it is more virile in a small %
> > > > > - it is particularly latent in the West/modern culture
where
> we
> > > > have
> > > > > turned our back on our spirituality
> > > > > - I dare say this forum has more than its share of latent
> > > > > spirituality under the surface
> > > > > - the psychic opposites are not antagonistic forces e.g.
soul
> > > > versus
> > > > > body but rather a complimentary whole so that is not a
matter
> of
> > > > > logic/programming trading versus intuitive/discretionary
> trading.
> > > > We
> > > > > are all using both, at different times and places, even
those
> who
> > > > > deny it (there is no such thing as a 100% objective/rational
> > > > person).
> > > > > - a healthy psyche has a good balance and flows between each
> > > > psychic
> > > > > pole in its own season.
> > > > >
> > > > > The main pragmatic points:
> > > > >
> > > > > - we can't bootstrap our subjective mind so we have to turn
to
> > > > > mentors for written or oral teaching
> > > > > - some have more aptitude for it than others
> > > > > - I was very priviliged to have some experience in these
> matters
> > > > long
> > > > > before I started trading (my subjective consciousness/soul
was
> > > > > already active and able to express itself in the world) but
it
> > > > still
> > > > > took years of pragmatic, practical, objective work
> to 'program'
> > > the
> > > > > trading mind to match i.e. I had to pass a sufficient
number
> of
> > > > > exams, in the core units, at the 'University of Trading',
> before
> > > I
> > > > > could 'enter the trading zone'.
> > > > >
> > > > > In laymans terms, my intuitive mind was functioning but I
> still
> > > had
> > > > > to go out and tediously train my rational/objective mind,
and
> > > learn
> > > > > as many of the objective rules of trading as I could,
before
> the
> > > > > subjective and the objective minds could synchronize in the
> > > trading
> > > > > room.
> > > > >
> > > > > "Give unto Caeser that which is Caesers AND give homage to
> your
> > > > God".
> > > > >
> > > > > brian_z
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%
> 40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > ps.com, "Jan
> > > > > Malmberg" <jan@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I sometimes daytrade using even delayed data for the
charts,
> > > and
> > > > a
> > > > > list
> > > > > > compiled list stored in my broker's web application. It
> works
> > > > > alright. Most
> > > > > > of the time I do short-to-mid-term swing trading. With
just
> the
> > > > 15-
> > > > > min
> > > > > > delayed data. Ok, real-time for the indexes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Here's my opinion.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The three components that determine your success are
> usually:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. Level of analysis. How good you can produce low-risk
> entries
> > > > > with a
> > > > > > probable future outcome, which of course is never totally
> > > > possible.
> > > > > > 2. Level of money management. How much you bet on one
single
> > > > > trade, how
> > > > > > well you scale in, scale out, set and stick to stop-
orders,
> and
> > > > > more.
> > > > > > 3. Level of spiritual attainment. How much you have
> attained the
> > > > > > "no-mind" state of the ancient warriors and spiritually
> > > achieved
> > > > > people.
> > > > > > Which means that you fearlessly execute trades while
> > > maintaining a
> > > > > > risk-appropriate behavior. Only really possible when you
no
> > > > longer
> > > > > fear the
> > > > > > horrible market and what it might do to you.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Which one is most important? The one you lack the most at
> the
> > > > > moment. I was
> > > > > > fortunate to start out with fairly solid money management
> from
> > > > the
> > > > > start.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best regards / JM
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _____
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From: amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%
> 40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > ps.com
> > > > > [mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%
> 40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > ps.com]
> > > > > On Behalf
> > > > > > Of Louis P.
> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, 31 July 2008 2:15 PM
> > > > > > To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%
40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > ps.com
> > > > > > Subject: [amibroker] Anyone actually making money?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I was only wondering... Anyone actually making money or
> making
> > > a
> > > > > living
> > > > > > with AB and trading?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've been working on ideas and plans for over 7 months
now
> and
> > > > > didn't find
> > > > > > anything convincing yet. I've been searching daily data,
> then
> > > > > hourly,
> > > > > > 15-minute and now I am into 1-minute data and nothing
seems
> > > > > satisfying.
> > > > > > Been searching RSI, MFI, ADX, MA, HHV, LLV... nothing
seems
> to
> > > > work.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So... Anyone is making consistent money with this, and if
> so,
> > > at
> > > > > which
> > > > > > timeframe and how do you do it?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm beginning to think about switching to tick database;
it
> > > seems
> > > > > even
> > > > > > 1-minute is too slow for intraday trading. Anyone making
> money
> > > > with
> > > > > > 1-minute?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Louis
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
------------------------------------
Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|