[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re[2]: SV: SV: SV: [amibroker] Anyone actually making money?



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Is it much more difficult to set it for intraday than for EOD?

Thanks Herman,

Louis

2008/8/5 Herman <psytek@xxxxxxxx>

Of course you must have a mechanical trading system. To develop code to place simple orders for an EOD system should not be a major problem.

First: http://www.amibroker.org/userkb/2007/04/24/setting-up-your-tws/

Next the master switch: http://www.amibroker.org/userkb/2007/04/28/preventing-false-at-starts/

Next would be timing: http://www.amibroker.org/userkb/2007/04/28/at-session-timing/

The rest depends on the complexity of your trading system...


best regards,

herman



Tuesday, August 5, 2008, 6:18:09 PM, you wrote:


>

Is it difficult to set an automatic IB account to get the '"computer to pull the trigger"?


Louis



2008/8/5 <professor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


Jan,

 

Since I started using my auto trading program (actually Barry's program), I still have the emotional feelings to trade. However, since I am not watching the market like I did before. I am not as tempted to trade. That trade that I wrote about is now showing almost $3000 profit and I wanted to sell at $1100 profit and again at $1500 profit. This is so much easier. I was sleeping when it traded this trade. Well,  it didn't actually trade it due to a problem which I have corrected, but my cell rang and woke me up. I checked the charts and made the trade manually. Remember that I only make about 5 or 6 trades a month so it is perfect for me.

 

Still, the stress level is almost none existant.

Tom

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Jan Malmberg 

To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 

Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 9:52 AM

Subject: SV: SV: SV: SV: [amibroker] Anyone actually making money?


To me, the hardest part of discretionary Elliott Wave trading is that – well, apart from finding the right pattern – is that very often when I am right, I am tempted to close profits too early. This has led to me using two sets of stoporders, initially using a critical level which breaks the pattern, and then using a trailing stop order once the breakout of the accumulation pattern occurs. Since I also had a problem with re-buying stocks that took out a minor formation, but then moved in the previously anticipated direction, I have started to implement a re-buy rule. Unfortunately, it has been hard to use it to its fullest. But I will get there.

What I am trying to say is that I am also using rules and trigger levels, although not in an automated fashion, and it is probably not really what you would call a trading system.

Best regards / JM


Från: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxFör Jan Malmberg

Skickat: den 5 augusti 2008 18:34

Till: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Ämne: SV: SV: SV: SV: [amibroker] Anyone actually making money?

And my discretionary/manual Elliott Wave-system gave me buy signal at OMXS30 865,25, which was contrary to my opinion on where we would go. Nice profits today. However, more training is required. Best regards / JM


Från: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxFör professor77747

Skickat: den 5 augusti 2008 17:32

Till: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Ämne: Re: SV: SV: SV: [amibroker] Anyone actually making money?

Originally, in this thread, comments were made about how your 

temperment and personality would affect your trading results. I have 

a trading program that I have tested both with backtesting and actual 

trading for about a year. I have been perfecting it for several 

years. 


Despite the fact that I believe that it works and have actually 

traded it and seen it work very profitably, I still have a hard time 

sticking to it. Which is why I am now autotrading it so that I don't 

have to make the decisions. 


However, I am not sticking to it like I should. In my last few 

trades, I traded when I was sure the market would change only to be 

proven wrong and my program correct. One my current gold futures 

short trade, I was up $1100 and was sure that gold was going up 

because it had dropped so far. I wanted to sell. My program didn't 

sell and I was determined to follow my program. Then gold dropped 

again and I was up $1700. This morning, gold went up and I didn't 

have a cover signal. I was now up only $1500. I knew that gold was on 

its way up. I actually had a buy order entered when my wife said that 

I should follow my program and let the program auto trade. I was sure 

that gold was on its way up and I was sure that I would lose so of my 

profit. Then I decided to wait. Gold went down again and I am up 

$2600 as I write this. 


My point is that emotions, greed, risk tolerance, and other factors 

will affect your trading profits.


Tom


--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Jan Malmberg" <jan@xxx> wrote:

>

> Thank you for some interesting posts. Much of it is so "obvious" 

that it is

> easy to forget it. Best regards / JM

> _____ 

> Från: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

För

> brian_z111

> Skickat: den 5 augusti 2008 04:47

> Till: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> Ämne: Re: SV: SV: [amibroker] Anyone actually making money?

> Quite right.

> Virtuality is the environment.

> It enhances and shapes the experience.

> I believe we can safely 'take the shortcut' if we are consciously 

> aware of what is involved (psychologically) and assist the process 

> i.e. to build our trading ALTER EGO by repetition. That is why it 

is 

> essential to settle on a market, a timeframe, a system etc (that 

> includes if making discretionary choices is the system) even if 

they 

> aren't the perfect choice.

> example:

> There is Tiger Woods the Golfer and Tiger Woods the Man.

> The golfing alter ego has been built over a long period by 

isolating 

> the key skills and then practising them continually.

> When he steps on the golf course the alter ego goes onto auto-pilot 

> (not a religious experience as such but an alternative 

consciousness, 

> or sub-consciousness, for sure).

> Once we have spent a long time on one market/timeframe/system the 

TAE 

> will be quite strong and we can then move to another Mkt/T/S and 

> adapt very quickly (I did that by moving to intraday stocks after 

> years of EOD stocks and picked it up to a reasonable level in a few 

> days - and I changed systems to suit the RT market too).

> brian_z

> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com

ps.com,

> Dennis Brown <see3d@> wrote:

> >

> > ~yes~

> > 

> > Also, once you realize the true nature of our "virtual" reality, 

> you 

> > can start playing with Monopoly money.

> > 

> > ~dennis

> > 

> > On Aug 4, 2008, at 8:38 PM, brian_z111 wrote:

> > 

> > > FTR

> > > I don't know how people can tranlate this into applied Trading

> > > Psychology but to set the record straight.

> > >

> > > Re the relevance of spirituality/personal development to 

trading:

> > >

> > > Using Indian spiritual philosophy as the example.

> > >

> > > There is no single philosophy but rather a myriad of inter-

related

> > > and sometimes conflicting ones.

> > > However, as a generalisation, the ideals of Indian spirituality 

> are

> > > passive (to a Westerner) and can be summarised as:

> > >

> > > - Man is a small replica of God (potentially)

> > > - the goal is to sublimate the mind of Man to the mind of God 

> (Yoga

> > > is the union of Man-God)

> > > - various practices are used to faclitate this (meditation, 

> prayer,

> > > singing/chanting, dancing etc)

> > > - permanancy of the union is a long and difficult goal, seldom

> > > achieved

> > > - temporary intimacy with the Gods, achieved via spiritual 

> practices,

> > > TRANSFORMS the practitioner and hence their culture

> > > - psyhic powers (Siddhi) are a byproduct and considered a 

> distraction

> > > and/or dangerous

> > > - worldly success is considered somewhat of lesser value than

> > > spiritual success

> > >

> > > "From the Unreal lead me to the Real".

> > >

> > > Once again these are gross simplifications which have been 

> vigorously

> > > debated for thousands of years.

> > >

> > > Western spirituality is active.

> > > We seek to "petition the Lord" to intervene in our 

lifes/culture 

> and

> > > to give us the Power(s), ostensibly to do his work.

> > >

> > > In both cases the spiritual path is the same, except that the

> > > emphasis is different, however all variations on the theme are

> > > operative in both cultures, via their sub-cultures.

> > >

> > >

> > > Applying this to trading:

> > >

> > > Will adopting spiritual practices, say meditation, or prayer, 

> make me

> > > a better trader?

> > >

> > > Is there any correspondence between the transcendental 

> consciousness

> > > of meditation/prayer and the mindset that successful traders 

have

> > > (assuming there is such a thing as a common identifiable traders

> > > mindset)?

> > >

> > > Possibly.

> > >

> > > In my own experience, if I had any advantages in this area when 

I

> > > started out trading i.e. I did "know myself" before I started

> > > trading, I still had to get to know the markets, TA, my broker, 

> data

> > > provider and software etc as well.

> > >

> > >

> > > Re 'Positive Thinking' and 'The Power of The Mind'

> > >

> > > This has been borrowed from spiritual teachings (power of 

Prayer 

> etc).

> > >

> > > This is an application of a limited part of spirituality, and 

> without

> > > the attendant ethics etc it can bring about Worldly Success but 

> that

> > > doesn't neccessarily equate to Life Success i.e. it is a partial

> > > spiritual practice without the full experience or spiritual 

> knowledge.

> > >

> > >

> > > Is there a mindset that successful traders have (as claimed by 

> Mark

> > > Douglas "In The Trading Zone")?

> > >

> > > Possibly, or Mark could have just found a good way to make some 

> money

> > > OR be projecting his personal needs/worldview onto the trading 

> world.

> > >

> > > As a hypothesis (a lot of traders say that trading changed the 

way

> > > they think i.e trading changed THEM).

> > >

> > > In my experience we tend to:

> > >

> > > - spend more and more time alone in the trading room

> > > - spend less and less time 'socialising'

> > > - spend long hours focused on single issues

> > > - our trading rooms are sensory deprived environments

> > > - undertake intensive problem solving/creative tasks

> > > - are confronted by our extreme emotional states etc

> > >

> > > It is possible that intense traders could eperience trading as

> > > personally transformative under those conditions and that they 

do

> > > experience, or even cultivate, altered consciousness (to some 

> extent)

> > > while actively engaged in trading.

> > >

> > > Based on the above is there anything we can do to facilitate 

> trading

> > > success?

> > >

> > > Sticking my neck out I predict super succesful traders would 

have

> > > some of the following habits/qualities:

> > >

> > > - they use positive thinking, either consciously or otherwise 

> (they

> > > almost certainly set goals)

> > > - they have self-confidence or self-esteem (if they don't have 

it

> > > when they start out they acquire it)

> > > - they are psychologically mature & comfortable in their skins

> > > (through other life experiences - not necessarily only acquired

> > > through academic success)

> > > - at some time in their life they have read or thought about the

> > > psychology of life/trading but it is not really a prominent 

part 

> of

> > > their daily thinking (they tend to do it rather than think 

about 

> it)

> > > - they are not very concerned with defining their style or over

> > > defining their trading

> > > - they have rituals (the way the office is setup, the time of 

the 

> day

> > > they do certain things) and they do things in order (download 

> data,

> > > scan, add to watchlist etc )

> > > - they have one trade that they do over and over (probably they 

> have

> > > some spare trades up their sleeve)

> > > - they have practised their one trade over and over (like a golf

> > > swing == 10000 repetitions)

> > > - they will be biased to simplicity and only add complexity 

where

> > > they are forced to

> > > - if they have more than one trade they will use it in a 

different

> > > time and place (unless it is part of a portfolio approach)

> > > - they don't consider their trade perfect i.e. others might have

> > > something better but it works for them and they are satisfied 

> with it

> > > - their trade is very personal (like a favourite son or 

daughter)

> > > - possibly they don't like to talk about trading, even the 

> extroverts

> > > probably become trading introverts (the trading ego is like an 

> alter

> > > ego that they put on and take off as they enter and leave the 

> trading

> > > room)

> > > - they don't like interruptions while trading

> > > - trading talk is noise to them

> > > - they are not as interested in buying things as they used to be

> > > except stuff for their trading environment (new computers, 

> software

> > > etc)

> > >

> > > Anybody recognise themselves in there anywhere?

> > >

> > > On a slightly different note:

> > >

> > > It is rather funny logic that we would think that all of the 

> traders

> > > who are 'in the zone' are discretionary traders and that all of 

> the

> > > other traders don't have the right stuff OR that there is only

> > > discretionary trading versus mechanical trading.

> > >

> > > Anyway, any trader who is consistently successful has the right

> > > mindset even if they/we can't define it.

> > >

> > > BTW I am not an authority on anything I just aim to share some

> > > opinions that others may find authoritive if there is any truth 

in

> > > them.

> > >

> > > brian_z *:-)

> > >

> > >

> > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com

ps.com,

> "brian_z111" <brian_z111@> 

> wrote:

> > >>

> > >> Jan,

> > >>

> > >> 100,000 repetitions indeed!

> > >>

> > >> Quite correct.

> > >>

> > >>

> > >>

> > >> However on the subject of 'mindNOT' and Samadhi etc.

> > >>

> > >> There are a lot of misconceptions floating around in the

> > > west/modern

> > >> culture, on these subjects, because of the mis-interpretation 

of

> > > the

> > >> spiritual tenents of our BROTHERS OF THE EAST by unqualified 

and

> > >> unauthorised 'teachers'.

> > >>

> > >> There is a dirth of true spiritual teachers in the West, for

> > > reasons

> > >> that I won't go into.

> > >>

> > >> You are mixing up two different principles.

> > >>

> > >> In symbolic terms:

> > >>

> > >> CONSCIOUSNESS wears the CROWN.

> > >> The objective NOT is the subjective ALL (THE LOGOS).

> > >>

> > >> You are confusing the "Son of God" with our "Heavenly Father"

> > >>

> > >> In general Kharma Yoga is the method for the west/modern 

culture 

> ==

> > >> the SOUL as an active principle == GOOD WORKS

> > >>

> > >> Pragmatically:

> > >>

> > >> Don't be concerned about NoMind - it is not for most of us - a 

> very

> > >> abstract subject beyond the ken of the majority.

> > >>

> > >> NoMind != mindlessness

> > >>

> > >> You can't achieve it because it is not there to be achieved in 

> the

> > >> way that you are conceiving it.

> > >>

> > >> Intuition is what we should be concerned with.

> > >>

> > >> Intuition is not mind reading OR an inferior psychic faculty 

i.e.

> > >> inferior to the Concete Mind (objective logic).

> > >> It is not the sixth sense, although we experience it as if it 

is.

> > >> It should be more correctly known as super-rationality.

> > >> It is our higher mind (also know as the Higher Self, the 

> OverSoul,

> > >> The Solar Angel, Abstract Mind, Manas).

> > >> It bridges the gap between Heaven and Earth.

> > >>

> > >> In trading it is most appropriately used along the lines

> > > of 'positive

> > >> thinking', the 'power of the mind', 'untapped levels of

> > >> consciousness' etc which is the popular form of it in the USA 

> where

> > >> it is a pseudo-religion (the reason for that is that it is so

> > > aligned

> > >> to the methods that are appropriate for the times).

> > >>

> > >> These methods are safe to use but it is very unfortunate if the

> > >> admonition to do GOOD WORKS doesn't accompany them.

> > >>

> > >>

> > >> In your case; you and your trading are working well and if it 

> ain't

> > >> broke don't fix it.

> > >>

> > >> Forget your search for the spiritual Holy Grail of NoMind - 

that 

> is

> > >> an impossible dream because it doesn't exist.

> > >>

> > >> I wouldn't worry about your personal spiritual welfare - you 

seem

> > > to

> > >> be sitting quite pretty.

> > >>

> > >> brian_z *:-)

> > >>

> > >>

> > >>

> > >>

> > >>

> > >> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%

40yahoogroups.comps.com,

> "Jan Malmberg" <jan@> wrote:

> > >>>

> > >>> Hi,

> > >>>

> > >>> Well, I had 6 years of martial arts training, where I 

understood

> > >> (but

> > >>> unfortunately not yet attained) the principle of "no-mind" 

when

> > >> executing

> > >>> tasks. I have also had some limited time as a military

> > > instructor,

> > >> and it

> > >>> became obvious that during patrol and combat, when people 

fire 

> at

> > >> you

> > >>> (blanks and smoke grenades, but still), there ones who make it

> > > are

> > >> the ones

> > >>> who do not take the time to think.

> > >>>

> > >>>

> > >>>

> > >>> However, ones ability to enter this state of mind is 

dependent 

> on

> > >> having

> > >>> enough training so that you subconsciously know that you 

really

> > > do

> > >> not have

> > >>> to think about how to move and shoot properly.

> > >>>

> > >>>

> > >>>

> > >>> Of the Tekki Shodan pattern, the ancient warriors said 

something

> > > to

> > >> the

> > >>> effect of "Most patterns require at least 10 000 executions

> > > before

> > >> being

> > >>> mastered. However, you should not even consider demonstrating

> > > Tekki

> > >> Shodan

> > >>> to your master before you have had 100 000 repetitions."

> > >>>

> > >>>

> > >>>

> > >>> It is interesting to note that to reach the original state of

> > > mind

> > >> while

> > >>> carrying out un-natural activities, you do need lots of 

> training,

> > >> and that

> > >>> some things in every field are a lot more difficult than the

> > >> average task in

> > >>> that skill set.

> > >>>

> > >>>

> > >>>

> > >>> Best regards / JM

> > >>>

> > >>>

> > >>>

> > >>> _____

> > >>>

> > >>> Från: amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%

40yahoogroups.comps.com

> > > [mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%

40yahoogroups.comps.com]

> > >> För

> > >>> brian_z111

> > >>> Skickat: den 1 augusti 2008 05:32

> > >>> Till: amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%

40yahoogroups.comps.com

> > >>> Ämne: Re: SV: [amibroker] Anyone actually making money?

> > >>>

> > >>>

> > >>>

> > >>>> 3. Level of spiritual attainment.

> > >>>

> > >>> Semantics plays a part in any discussion, especially when we 

are

> > >>> crossing cultures etc. It plays a greater role in 'spiritual'

> > >>> discussion than it does in any other.

> > >>>

> > >>> So, first the semantics.

> > >>>

> > >>> We are not limited to the term 'spirituality' as we can talk

> > > around

> > >>> the same area in many different terms (objective 

mind/subjective

> > >>> mind, rational/intuitive, super-consciousness, super-

rationality

> > >> the

> > >>> collective unconscious, God, the Soul, the Divine, the Supreme

> > > and

> > >>> millions more).

> > >>>

> > >>> For ease of discussion I will stick with 'spirituality'.

> > >>>

> > >>> A few basic points:

> > >>>

> > >>> - generally the 'spiritual gene' is latent in humanity, across

> > > all

> > >>> cultures

> > >>> - it is more virile in a small %

> > >>> - it is particularly latent in the West/modern culture where 

we

> > >> have

> > >>> turned our back on our spirituality

> > >>> - I dare say this forum has more than its share of latent

> > >>> spirituality under the surface

> > >>> - the psychic opposites are not antagonistic forces e.g. soul

> > >> versus

> > >>> body but rather a complimentary whole so that is not a matter 

of

> > >>> logic/programming trading versus intuitive/discretionary 

> trading.

> > >> We

> > >>> are all using both, at different times and places, even those 

> who

> > >>> deny it (there is no such thing as a 100% objective/rational

> > >> person).

> > >>> - a healthy psyche has a good balance and flows between each

> > >> psychic

> > >>> pole in its own season.

> > >>>

> > >>> The main pragmatic points:

> > >>>

> > >>> - we can't bootstrap our subjective mind so we have to turn to

> > >>> mentors for written or oral teaching

> > >>> - some have more aptitude for it than others

> > >>> - I was very priviliged to have some experience in these 

matters

> > >> long

> > >>> before I started trading (my subjective consciousness/soul was

> > >>> already active and able to express itself in the world) but it

> > >> still

> > >>> took years of pragmatic, practical, objective work 

to 'program'

> > > the

> > >>> trading mind to match i.e. I had to pass a sufficient number 

of

> > >>> exams, in the core units, at the 'University of Trading', 

before

> > > I

> > >>> could 'enter the trading zone'.

> > >>>

> > >>> In laymans terms, my intuitive mind was functioning but I 

still

> > > had

> > >>> to go out and tediously train my rational/objective mind, and

> > > learn

> > >>> as many of the objective rules of trading as I could, before 

the

> > >>> subjective and the objective minds could synchronize in the

> > > trading

> > >>> room.

> > >>>

> > >>> "Give unto Caeser that which is Caesers AND give homage to 

your

> > >> God".

> > >>>

> > >>> brian_z

> > >>>

> > >>> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%

40yahoogroups.com>

> > >> ps.com, "Jan

> > >>> Malmberg" <jan@> wrote:

> > >>>>

> > >>>> Hi,

> > >>>>

> > >>>> I sometimes daytrade using even delayed data for the charts,

> > > and

> > >> a

> > >>> list

> > >>>> compiled list stored in my broker's web application. It works

> > >>> alright. Most

> > >>>> of the time I do short-to-mid-term swing trading. With just 

the

> > >> 15-

> > >>> min

> > >>>> delayed data. Ok, real-time for the indexes.

> > >>>>

> > >>>>

> > >>>>

> > >>>> Here's my opinion.

> > >>>>

> > >>>>

> > >>>>

> > >>>> The three components that determine your success are usually:

> > >>>>

> > >>>> 1. Level of analysis. How good you can produce low-risk 

entries

> > >>> with a

> > >>>> probable future outcome, which of course is never totally

> > >> possible.

> > >>>> 2. Level of money management. How much you bet on one single

> > >>> trade, how

> > >>>> well you scale in, scale out, set and stick to stop-orders, 

and

> > >>> more.

> > >>>> 3. Level of spiritual attainment. How much you have attained 

> the

> > >>>> "no-mind" state of the ancient warriors and spiritually

> > > achieved

> > >>> people.

> > >>>> Which means that you fearlessly execute trades while

> > > maintaining a

> > >>>> risk-appropriate behavior. Only really possible when you no

> > >> longer

> > >>> fear the

> > >>>> horrible market and what it might do to you.

> > >>>>

> > >>>>

> > >>>>

> > >>>> Which one is most important? The one you lack the most at the

> > >>> moment. I was

> > >>>> fortunate to start out with fairly solid money management 

from

> > >> the

> > >>> start.

> > >>>>

> > >>>>

> > >>>>

> > >>>> Best regards / JM

> > >>>>

> > >>>>

> > >>>>

> > >>>>

> > >>>>

> > >>>>

> > >>>> _____

> > >>>>

> > >>>>

> > >>>> From: amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%

40yahoogroups.com>

> > >> ps.com

> > >>> [mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%

40yahoogroups.com>

> > >> ps.com]

> > >>> On Behalf

> > >>>> Of Louis P.

> > >>>> Sent: Thursday, 31 July 2008 2:15 PM

> > >>>> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com>

> > >> ps.com

> > >>>> Subject: [amibroker] Anyone actually making money?

> > >>>>

> > >>>> Hi,

> > >>>>

> > >>>> I was only wondering... Anyone actually making money or 

making

> > > a

> > >>> living

> > >>>> with AB and trading?

> > >>>>

> > >>>> I've been working on ideas and plans for over 7 months now 

and

> > >>> didn't find

> > >>>> anything convincing yet. I've been searching daily data, then

> > >>> hourly,

> > >>>> 15-minute and now I am into 1-minute data and nothing seems

> > >>> satisfying.

> > >>>> Been searching RSI, MFI, ADX, MA, HHV, LLV... nothing seems 

to

> > >> work.

> > >>>>

> > >>>> So... Anyone is making consistent money with this, and if so,

> > > at

> > >>> which

> > >>>> timeframe and how do you do it?

> > >>>>

> > >>>> I'm beginning to think about switching to tick database; it

> > > seems

> > >>> even

> > >>>> 1-minute is too slow for intraday trading. Anyone making 

money

> > >> with

> > >>>> 1-minute?

> > >>>>

> > >>>> Thanks,

> > >>>>

> > >>>> Louis

> > >>>>

> > >>>

> > >>

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ------------------------------------

> > >

> > > Please note that this group is for discussion between users 

only.

> > >

> > > To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to

> > > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com

> > >

> > > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check 

DEVLOG:

> > > http://www.amibroke <http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/

r.com/devlog/

> > >

> > > For other support material please check also:

> > > http://www.amibroke <http://www.amibroker.com/support.html>

r.com/support.html

> > > Yahoo! Groups Links

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

>

 


__._,_.___

Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.

To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com

For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/

For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___