[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SV: SV: [amibroker] Anyone actually making money?



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Quite right.

Virtuality is the environment.

It enhances and shapes the experience.

I believe we can safely 'take the shortcut' if we are consciously 
aware of what is involved (psychologically) and assist the process 
i.e. to build our trading ALTER EGO by repetition. That is why it is 
essential to settle on a market, a timeframe, a system etc (that 
includes if making discretionary choices is the system) even if they 
aren't the perfect choice.

example:

There is Tiger Woods the Golfer and Tiger Woods the Man.

The golfing alter ego has been built over a long period by isolating 
the key skills and then practising them continually.
When he steps on the golf course the alter ego goes onto auto-pilot 
(not a religious experience as such but an alternative consciousness, 
or sub-consciousness, for sure).

Once we have spent a long time on one market/timeframe/system the TAE 
will be quite strong and we can then move to another Mkt/T/S and 
adapt very quickly (I did that by moving to intraday stocks after 
years of EOD stocks and picked it up to a reasonable level in a few 
days - and I changed systems to suit the RT market too).

brian_z


--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Dennis Brown <see3d@xxx> wrote:
>
> ~yes~
> 
> Also, once you realize the true nature of our "virtual" reality, 
you  
> can start playing with Monopoly money.
> 
> ~dennis
> 
> On Aug 4, 2008, at 8:38 PM, brian_z111 wrote:
> 
> > FTR
> > I don't know how people can tranlate this into applied Trading
> > Psychology but to set the record straight.
> >
> > Re the relevance of spirituality/personal development to trading:
> >
> > Using Indian spiritual philosophy as the example.
> >
> > There is no single philosophy but rather a myriad of inter-related
> > and sometimes conflicting ones.
> > However, as a generalisation, the ideals of Indian spirituality 
are
> > passive (to a Westerner) and can be summarised as:
> >
> > - Man is a small replica of God (potentially)
> > - the goal is to sublimate the mind of Man to the mind of God 
(Yoga
> > is the union of Man-God)
> > - various practices are used to faclitate this (meditation, 
prayer,
> > singing/chanting, dancing etc)
> > - permanancy of the union is a long and difficult goal, seldom
> > achieved
> > - temporary intimacy with the Gods, achieved via spiritual 
practices,
> > TRANSFORMS the practitioner and hence their culture
> > - psyhic powers (Siddhi) are a byproduct and considered a 
distraction
> > and/or dangerous
> > - worldly success is considered somewhat of lesser value than
> > spiritual success
> >
> > "From the Unreal lead me to the Real".
> >
> > Once again these are gross simplifications which have been 
vigorously
> > debated for thousands of years.
> >
> > Western spirituality is active.
> > We seek to "petition the Lord" to intervene in our lifes/culture 
and
> > to give us the Power(s), ostensibly to do his work.
> >
> > In both cases the spiritual path is the same, except that the
> > emphasis is different, however all variations on the theme are
> > operative in both cultures, via their sub-cultures.
> >
> >
> > Applying this to trading:
> >
> > Will adopting spiritual practices, say meditation, or prayer, 
make me
> > a better trader?
> >
> > Is there any correspondence between the transcendental 
consciousness
> > of meditation/prayer and the mindset that successful traders have
> > (assuming there is such a thing as a common identifiable traders
> > mindset)?
> >
> > Possibly.
> >
> > In my own experience, if I had any advantages in this area when I
> > started out trading i.e. I did "know myself" before I started
> > trading, I still had to get to know the markets, TA, my broker, 
data
> > provider and software etc as well.
> >
> >
> > Re 'Positive Thinking' and 'The Power of The Mind'
> >
> > This has been borrowed from spiritual teachings (power of Prayer 
etc).
> >
> > This is an application of a limited part of spirituality, and 
without
> > the attendant ethics etc it can bring about Worldly Success but 
that
> > doesn't neccessarily equate to Life Success i.e. it is a partial
> > spiritual practice without the full experience or spiritual 
knowledge.
> >
> >
> > Is there a mindset that successful traders have (as claimed by 
Mark
> > Douglas "In The Trading Zone")?
> >
> > Possibly, or Mark could have just found a good way to make some 
money
> > OR be projecting his personal needs/worldview onto the trading 
world.
> >
> > As a hypothesis (a lot of traders say that trading changed the way
> > they think i.e trading changed THEM).
> >
> > In my experience we tend to:
> >
> > - spend more and more time alone in the trading room
> > - spend less and less time 'socialising'
> > - spend long hours focused on single issues
> > - our trading rooms are sensory deprived environments
> > - undertake intensive problem solving/creative tasks
> > - are confronted by our extreme emotional states etc
> >
> > It is possible that intense traders could eperience trading as
> > personally transformative under those conditions and that they do
> > experience, or even cultivate, altered consciousness (to some 
extent)
> > while actively engaged in trading.
> >
> > Based on the above is there anything we can do to facilitate 
trading
> > success?
> >
> > Sticking my neck out I predict super succesful traders would have
> > some of the following habits/qualities:
> >
> > - they use positive thinking, either consciously or otherwise 
(they
> > almost certainly set goals)
> > - they have self-confidence or self-esteem (if they don't have it
> > when they start out they acquire it)
> > - they are psychologically mature & comfortable in their skins
> > (through other life experiences - not necessarily only acquired
> > through academic success)
> > - at some time in their life they have read or thought about the
> > psychology of life/trading but it is not really a prominent part 
of
> > their daily thinking (they tend to do it rather than think about 
it)
> > - they are not very concerned with defining their style or over
> > defining their trading
> > - they have rituals (the way the office is setup, the time of the 
day
> > they do certain things) and they do things in order (download 
data,
> > scan, add to watchlist etc )
> > - they have one trade that they do over and over (probably they 
have
> > some spare trades up their sleeve)
> > - they have practised their one trade over and over (like a golf
> > swing == 10000 repetitions)
> > - they will be biased to simplicity and only add complexity where
> > they are forced to
> > - if they have more than one trade they will use it in a different
> > time and place (unless it is part of a portfolio approach)
> > - they don't  consider their trade perfect i.e. others might have
> > something better but it works for them and they are satisfied 
with it
> > - their trade is very personal (like a favourite son or daughter)
> > - possibly they don't like to talk about trading, even the 
extroverts
> > probably become trading introverts (the trading ego is like an 
alter
> > ego that they put on and take off as they enter and leave the 
trading
> > room)
> > - they don't like interruptions while trading
> > - trading talk is noise to them
> > - they are not as interested in buying things as they used to be
> > except stuff for their trading environment (new computers, 
software
> > etc)
> >
> > Anybody recognise themselves in there anywhere?
> >
> > On a slightly different note:
> >
> > It is rather funny logic that we would think that all of the 
traders
> > who are 'in the zone' are discretionary traders and that all of 
the
> > other traders don't have the right stuff OR that there is only
> > discretionary trading versus mechanical trading.
> >
> > Anyway, any trader who is consistently successful has the right
> > mindset even if they/we can't define it.
> >
> > BTW I am not an authority  on anything I just aim to share some
> > opinions that others may find authoritive if there is any truth in
> > them.
> >
> > brian_z *:-)
> >
> >
> > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "brian_z111" <brian_z111@> 
wrote:
> >>
> >> Jan,
> >>
> >> 100,000 repetitions indeed!
> >>
> >> Quite correct.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> However on the subject of 'mindNOT' and Samadhi etc.
> >>
> >> There are a lot of misconceptions floating around in the
> > west/modern
> >> culture, on these subjects, because of the mis-interpretation of
> > the
> >> spiritual tenents of our BROTHERS OF THE EAST by unqualified and
> >> unauthorised 'teachers'.
> >>
> >> There is a dirth of true spiritual teachers in the West, for
> > reasons
> >> that I won't go into.
> >>
> >> You are mixing up two different principles.
> >>
> >> In symbolic terms:
> >>
> >> CONSCIOUSNESS wears the CROWN.
> >> The objective NOT is the subjective ALL (THE LOGOS).
> >>
> >> You are confusing the "Son of God" with our "Heavenly Father"
> >>
> >> In general Kharma Yoga is the method for the west/modern culture 
==
> >> the SOUL as an active principle == GOOD WORKS
> >>
> >> Pragmatically:
> >>
> >> Don't be concerned about NoMind - it is not for most of us - a 
very
> >> abstract subject beyond the ken of the majority.
> >>
> >> NoMind != mindlessness
> >>
> >> You can't achieve it because it is not there to be achieved in 
the
> >> way that you are conceiving it.
> >>
> >> Intuition is what we should be concerned with.
> >>
> >> Intuition is not mind reading OR an inferior psychic faculty i.e.
> >> inferior to the Concete Mind (objective logic).
> >> It is not the sixth sense, although we experience it as if it is.
> >> It should be more correctly known as super-rationality.
> >> It is our higher mind (also know as the Higher Self, the 
OverSoul,
> >> The Solar Angel, Abstract Mind, Manas).
> >> It bridges the gap between Heaven and Earth.
> >>
> >> In trading it is most appropriately used along the lines
> > of 'positive
> >> thinking', the 'power of the mind', 'untapped levels of
> >> consciousness' etc which is the popular form of it in the USA 
where
> >> it is a pseudo-religion (the reason for that is that it is so
> > aligned
> >> to the methods that are appropriate for the times).
> >>
> >> These methods are safe to use but it is very unfortunate if the
> >> admonition to do GOOD WORKS doesn't accompany them.
> >>
> >>
> >> In your case; you and your trading are working well and if it 
ain't
> >> broke don't fix it.
> >>
> >> Forget your search for the spiritual Holy Grail of NoMind - that 
is
> >> an impossible dream because it doesn't exist.
> >>
> >> I wouldn't worry about your personal spiritual welfare - you seem
> > to
> >> be sitting quite pretty.
> >>
> >> brian_z *:-)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Jan Malmberg" <jan@> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Well, I had 6 years of martial arts training, where I understood
> >> (but
> >>> unfortunately not yet attained) the principle of "no-mind" when
> >> executing
> >>> tasks. I have also had some limited time as a military
> > instructor,
> >> and it
> >>> became obvious that during patrol and combat, when people fire 
at
> >> you
> >>> (blanks and smoke grenades, but still), there ones who make it
> > are
> >> the ones
> >>> who do not take the time to think.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> However, ones ability to enter this state of mind is dependent 
on
> >> having
> >>> enough training so that you subconsciously know that you really
> > do
> >> not have
> >>> to think about how to move and shoot properly.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Of the Tekki Shodan pattern, the ancient warriors said something
> > to
> >> the
> >>> effect of "Most patterns require at least 10 000 executions
> > before
> >> being
> >>> mastered. However, you should not even consider demonstrating
> > Tekki
> >> Shodan
> >>> to your master before you have had 100 000 repetitions."
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> It is interesting to note that to reach the original state of
> > mind
> >> while
> >>> carrying out un-natural activities, you do need lots of 
training,
> >> and that
> >>> some things in every field are a lot more difficult than the
> >> average task in
> >>> that skill set.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Best regards / JM
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>  _____
> >>>
> >>> Från: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >> För
> >>> brian_z111
> >>> Skickat: den 1 augusti 2008 05:32
> >>> Till: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> Ämne: Re: SV: [amibroker] Anyone actually making money?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> 3. Level of spiritual attainment.
> >>>
> >>> Semantics plays a part in any discussion, especially when we are
> >>> crossing cultures etc. It plays a greater role in 'spiritual'
> >>> discussion than it does in any other.
> >>>
> >>> So, first the semantics.
> >>>
> >>> We are not limited to the term 'spirituality' as we can talk
> > around
> >>> the same area in many different terms (objective mind/subjective
> >>> mind, rational/intuitive, super-consciousness, super-rationality
> >> the
> >>> collective unconscious, God, the Soul, the Divine, the Supreme
> > and
> >>> millions more).
> >>>
> >>> For ease of discussion I will stick with 'spirituality'.
> >>>
> >>> A few basic points:
> >>>
> >>> - generally the 'spiritual gene' is latent in humanity, across
> > all
> >>> cultures
> >>> - it is more virile in a small %
> >>> - it is particularly latent in the West/modern culture where we
> >> have
> >>> turned our back on our spirituality
> >>> - I dare say this forum has more than its share of latent
> >>> spirituality under the surface
> >>> - the psychic opposites are not antagonistic forces e.g. soul
> >> versus
> >>> body but rather a complimentary whole so that is not a matter of
> >>> logic/programming trading versus intuitive/discretionary 
trading.
> >> We
> >>> are all using both, at different times and places, even those 
who
> >>> deny it (there is no such thing as a 100% objective/rational
> >> person).
> >>> - a healthy psyche has a good balance and flows between each
> >> psychic
> >>> pole in its own season.
> >>>
> >>> The main pragmatic points:
> >>>
> >>> - we can't bootstrap our subjective mind so we have to turn to
> >>> mentors for written or oral teaching
> >>> - some have more aptitude for it than others
> >>> - I was very priviliged to have some experience in these matters
> >> long
> >>> before I started trading (my subjective consciousness/soul was
> >>> already active and able to express itself in the world) but it
> >> still
> >>> took years of pragmatic, practical, objective work to 'program'
> > the
> >>> trading mind to match i.e. I had to pass a sufficient number of
> >>> exams, in the core units, at the 'University of Trading', before
> > I
> >>> could 'enter the trading zone'.
> >>>
> >>> In laymans terms, my intuitive mind was functioning but I still
> > had
> >>> to go out and tediously train my rational/objective mind, and
> > learn
> >>> as many of the objective rules of trading as I could, before the
> >>> subjective and the objective minds could synchronize in the
> > trading
> >>> room.
> >>>
> >>> "Give unto Caeser that which is Caesers AND give homage to your
> >> God".
> >>>
> >>> brian_z
> >>>
> >>> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com>
> >> ps.com, "Jan
> >>> Malmberg" <jan@> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I sometimes daytrade using even delayed data for the charts,
> > and
> >> a
> >>> list
> >>>> compiled list stored in my broker's web application. It works
> >>> alright. Most
> >>>> of the time I do short-to-mid-term swing trading. With just the
> >> 15-
> >>> min
> >>>> delayed data. Ok, real-time for the indexes.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Here's my opinion.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> The three components that determine your success are usually:
> >>>>
> >>>> 1. Level of analysis. How good you can produce low-risk entries
> >>> with a
> >>>> probable future outcome, which of course is never totally
> >> possible.
> >>>> 2. Level of money management. How much you bet on one single
> >>> trade, how
> >>>> well you scale in, scale out, set and stick to stop-orders, and
> >>> more.
> >>>> 3. Level of spiritual attainment. How much you have attained 
the
> >>>> "no-mind" state of the ancient warriors and spiritually
> > achieved
> >>> people.
> >>>> Which means that you fearlessly execute trades while
> > maintaining a
> >>>> risk-appropriate behavior. Only really possible when you no
> >> longer
> >>> fear the
> >>>> horrible market and what it might do to you.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Which one is most important? The one you lack the most at the
> >>> moment. I was
> >>>> fortunate to start out with fairly solid money management from
> >> the
> >>> start.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Best regards / JM
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _____
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> From: amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com>
> >> ps.com
> >>> [mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com>
> >> ps.com]
> >>> On Behalf
> >>>> Of Louis P.
> >>>> Sent: Thursday, 31 July 2008 2:15 PM
> >>>> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com>
> >> ps.com
> >>>> Subject: [amibroker] Anyone actually making money?
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I was only wondering... Anyone actually making money or making
> > a
> >>> living
> >>>> with AB and trading?
> >>>>
> >>>> I've been working on ideas and plans for over 7 months now and
> >>> didn't find
> >>>> anything convincing yet. I've been searching daily data, then
> >>> hourly,
> >>>> 15-minute and now I am into 1-minute data and nothing seems
> >>> satisfying.
> >>>> Been searching RSI, MFI, ADX, MA, HHV, LLV... nothing seems to
> >> work.
> >>>>
> >>>> So... Anyone is making consistent money with this, and if so,
> > at
> >>> which
> >>>> timeframe and how do you do it?
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm beginning to think about switching to tick database; it
> > seems
> >>> even
> >>>> 1-minute is too slow for intraday trading. Anyone making money
> >> with
> >>>> 1-minute?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>> Louis
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
> >
> > To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
> > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> >
> > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> >
> > For other support material please check also:
> > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>



------------------------------------

Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.

To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to 
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com

For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/

For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/