Re: [amibroker] Re: Adventures in improving Ami Backtest speed

[ftonetti@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

The implications for batch run times are the same ...

 

----- Original Message -----
From: danielwardadams
Date: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 9:04 am
Subject: [amibroker] Re: Adventures in improving Ami Backtest speed
To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> Fred,
> Could I expect the same type of speedup when running an IO batch
> file
> containing 100 symbols?
>
> If it didn't speedup 'automatically", could I split the batch
> file
> into 4 subfiles and target each one towards a different core?
>
> Dan
>
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ftonetti@xxx wrote:
> >
> > My solution was more simplistc:
> >
> > I upgraded from a Core 2 Duo to a dual Core 2 Quad and changed
> IO
> to allow local in addition to remote servers.
> >
> > Result ... Optimizations on Watchlists run 20 times faster ...
> >
> >
>
>
>

__._,_.___








Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.

To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to 
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com

For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/

For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___