|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hi - It is very nice to hear from someone who actually worked on the inside
and knows firsthand how the "big boys" operate. I wonder if you would mind
giving your opinion on a couple of other questions which seem to surface
quite a bit on trading boards, etc.
1. To what extent would you say the markets are manipulated? I am always
reading how the big boys will manipulate the markets to "steer the herd",
etc, For example, spend a few million $$ ( pocket change for them I guess )
on futures to move the markets where they want them to go, buy or sell at
the price they want, then withdraw and let things collapse, etc. Or spin
the news to drive the markets where they want them. Or they just plain
lie...Or they work together to manipulate prices..etc, etc...I have heard
many of these kinds of stories. Cramer seems to agree. But on the other
hand, I can't help but wonder if we ( the little guys ) have enough money to
be worth manipulating... What do you think?
2. I guess there are quite a few private platforms now where the big boys
can trade directly with each other rather than on the open market. Do you
see this having much of an effect on the markets.
Thanks very much for your insights!
Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: "sidhartha70" <sidhartha70@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 9:23 AM
Subject: [amibroker] Re: NEW USER - simple question.......
> Just to give another viewpoint on this, and perhaps a slightly sunnier
> assessment... I also
> believe traders can often believe the opposite. i.e. that markets are
> completely efficient
> and therefore it's impossible to make money. My own experience has shown
> again and
> again that markets have pockets of inefficientcy and that continues,
> albeit the form is
> constantly in evolution.
>
> Take a simple, liquid stock like VOD.L. There are literally endless
> strategies that could be
> designed (billions)... it's my guess that no more than a few thousand are
> actually
> employed or 'scanned' at any one time. Actually I think a few thousand is
> very generous. I
> believe it could be considerably less than that. I used to work at the
> proprietary trading
> desks of Merrill Lynch, Barclays Capital and Nomura (all in London) over
> the last 12 years.
> I can assure any reader that notions of a supercomputer churning away
> testing millions of
> strategies is way off the mark. They trade a handful of tried and tested
> strategies that are
> constantly tweaked and improved... or even more than that, they trade off
> proprietary
> information about money flow that is not available to the open market.
>
> The point is, there is so much institutional money flowing through the
> market... fund
> managers, market makers filling client orders, options traders hedging,
> index arbitragers,
> portfolio traders trying to match VWAP... the list goes on an on... and in
> my experience,
> none of these guys give a stuff about technicals or the short to medium
> term movement of
> the stock. That's not their game. They are either hedging so want
> immediate cover or they
> are much longer term, or they are measured on a different benchmark to
> individual
> proprietary traders like you and I. We are a fraction of an enormous
> marketplace, the vast
> bulk of which isn't trying to do what we are.
>
> OF course that doesn't mean making money is easy... it's not... but I
> believe the reason is
> more fundamental to free markets rather than the idea that millions of
> traders or a
> supercomputer, is scanning millions & millions of strategies as we speak.
> I believe free
> markets have (for more than half the time, probably more like 80-90% of
> the time) very
> low signal to noise ratio's... and they therefore do approach random
> behaviour most of the
> time. This can give the impression that markets are efficient... but they
> are not.
>
> Anyway, it is possible to consistently make money... it always will be, by
> definition there
> will always be opportunities in the market place. Don't be put off by talk
> of super
> computers scanning every possible market efficientcy. I'm still constantly
> surprised at how
> inefficient markets are.... Look at the recent countertrend rally we had
> to 1440 in the S&P
> in the middle of a bear market. ;-)
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
>
> To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
>
> For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
>
> For other support material please check also:
> http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------
Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|