|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Thanks.
You know someone can be good at somethings but you just can't teach
them to tie their shoelaces - well I am like that with posting
conventions - I just can't muster the mindset. Jack Fagan kindly
tried to teach me all about it but it didn't sink in.
Apologies to Prashant for messing up his thread - I should have
started my own thread.
brian_z
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Dennis Brown <see3d@xxx> wrote:
>
> Brian,
>
> Since top posting is the convention here, if someone were to
complain
> about your top posting they would be out of place in that they
would
> have to complain about everyone else's top posting also. I
> appreciate all your posts. However, because of the way lines get
> artificially split with past post indentations I often skip
reading
> any post that is not on top unless I really need to know the
> information. And since I don't archive past the conclusion post
of
> interesting (to me) threads, a bottom post may get missed entirely
> when I review top posts for the conclusion of the thread on a
> subsequent search.
>
> I would appreciate top posting by all as the convention that is
most
> useful to the list --and including the whole thread with any reply.
>
> My 2 cents, FWIW.
>
> Best regards,
> Dennis
>
>
>
> On Dec 2, 2007, at 6:36 AM, Thomas Ludwig wrote:
>
> >
> >> Bob,
> >>
> >> If I top post some people ask me to change because in their email
> >> datbases they don't know who is answering what.
> >> (it actually looks better at the website and I personally prefer
it
> >> but I changed to help the email savers).
> >>
> >> If I bottom post it looks crappy at the website and it is harder
for
> >> me but those who save have a better record - I can't win.
> >>
> >> I miss having Yuki around - one of the few women in a forum full
of
> >> grumpy males and a Japanese woman to boot - also one who was
quite
> >> comfortable with us.
> >>
> >> Yes, I do talk far too much sometimes.
> >
> > Brian, don't worry - it's always great to read your comments, and
I
> > think
> > everybody here appreciates your dedication!
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Thomas
> >
> >
> >>
> >> brian_z
> >>
> >>
> >> If I bottom post --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Bob Jagow"
> >>
> >> <bjagow@> wrote:
> >>> Not her bottom posting <g>
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >> [mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> >>
> >>> Behalf Of brian_z111
> >>> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 11:32 PM
> >>> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> Subject: [amibroker] Re: help needed on adx coding.
> >>>
> >>> Do you miss her?
> >>>
> >>> brian_z
> >>>
> >>> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Bob Jagow" <bjagow@> wrote:
> >>>> How come, Brian, that you usually end up in my "too big to
read"
> >>>
> >>> spam
> >>>
> >>>> folder?
> >>>> My only excuse is that I'm hardly acute enuf to pluck a single
> >>>
> >>> wheat kennel
> >>>
> >>>> from a pile of chaff.
> >>>> Even worse, only you [now that Yuki has departed, supposedly
to
> >>>
> >>> spend her
> >>>
> >>>> ill-gotten gains], bury the chaff at the end of the quoted msg.
> >>>>
> >>>> Chidingly,
> >>>> Bob
> >>>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>
> >>> [mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> >>>
> >>>> Behalf Of brian_z111
> >>>> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 4:32 PM
> >>>> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> Subject: [amibroker] Re: help needed on adx coding.
> >>>>
> >>>> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Tomasz Janeczko" <groups@>
> >>>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> Yes, BUT... you truncated my original response.
> >>>>> I did not only say that it was discussed before.
> >>>>> I also wrote:
> >>>>> " See for example this:
> >>>>>
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/message/116612
> >>>>> "
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So I also added EXACT LINK to the post that presents the
> >>
> >> solution
> >>
> >>>>> (so I did perform a search for person who asked and provided
> >>
> >> him a
> >>
> >>>> result that answers the question).
> >>>>
> >>>>> So I don't even expect the user to use search as I did this
for
> >>>>
> >>>> him/her already.
> >>>>
> >>>>> Do you expect me to copy-paste old posts instead of putting
the
> >>>>
> >>>> link ? I hope not.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> No, of course not.
> >>>>
> >>>> No, I don't expect you to do anything other than what you
perceive
> >>>
> >>> to
> >>>
> >>>> be the right course of action. I am simply haolding a
discussion
> >>>
> >>> with
> >>>
> >>>> the purpose of exchanging information. My expectation of
others is
> >>>> that they are free to accept or reject my opinions and apply
(or
> >>>
> >>> not)
> >>>
> >>>> them in any way they like.
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes, your response was above and beyond - as I said "no one can
> >>
> >> ask
> >>
> >>>> you to do more". Also, it is not a critique of you (publically
and
> >>>> privately I respect you). Since it was not a critique of you I
> >>>
> >>> didn't
> >>>
> >>>> reference your behaviour (which was exemplary anyway).
> >>>>
> >>>> I truncated your answer because I was only addressing the 'go
> >>>> search', and by implication, the 'go read the manual' mantra.
> >>>>
> >>>> I simply listed some factual observations, without drawing any
> >>>> inferences or asking anybody to do anything.
> >>>>
> >>>> I am observing:
> >>>>
> >>>> 1) That all of the information I need to learn "how to use AB",
> >>>> rather than "how to apply AB", is not in the help manual.
> >>>> 2) That the help manual contains 'out of date' material.
> >>>> 3) That a lot of helpful material, that is additional to the
> >>
> >> manual
> >>
> >>>> is available in various places BUT searching to find that
> >>
> >> material,
> >>
> >>>> with the methods at my disposal, are very inefficient (perhaps
> >>
> >> there
> >>
> >>>> are some, as yet unknown to me, methods I can use).
> >>>> 4) That "you' have asked "us" (the users) to make every effort
to
> >>>
> >>> use
> >>>
> >>>> the above resources before contacting support - to free your
time
> >>>
> >>> for
> >>>
> >>>> more productive pursuits - I 100% agree with this and anyway I
am
> >>>> super proud to do it under my own steam.
> >>>> 5)The majority of AB users are in full time employment and so
are
> >>>> time challenged.
> >>>> 6) It is human nature to avoid what is excessively painful, for
> >>>> little or no gain, and seek out what is pleasurable and/or
returns
> >>>> hign gain.
> >>>> 7) Internet forums are "live" - solutions posted there tend to
get
> >>>> lost in the 'electronic void'.
> >>>> 8)The ways in which we acquire info have changed (there is so
much
> >>>
> >>> of
> >>>
> >>>> it) - generally people are not going to read what we write
because
> >>>> there is too much of it - they only want to do targetted
searching
> >>>> for an answer to the now problem (and what is wrong with
that? -
> >>>
> >>> that
> >>>
> >>>> is exactly tha nature of the net and why we love it!)
> >>>> 9) Even if people do read all the material, levels and speed of
> >>>> comprehension vary - we can't help that - it is not our fault.
> >>>>
> >>>> I would like to correct myself though - the out of date
material
> >>
> >> in
> >>
> >>>> the manual is the worst part of the AB experience, followed by
the
> >>>> inefficient search tools.
> >>>>
> >>>> I haven't drawn any inferences from this (so far) but IYO are
any
> >>
> >> of
> >>
> >>>> the above points 1-9 factually incorrect.
> >>>>
> >>>> If they are not I propose a possible conclusion:
> >>>>
> >>>> 1) "We" will never be able to control peoples behaviour - some
> >>>
> >>> people
> >>>
> >>>> will always continue to expect others to do their "dirty" work
for
> >>>> them so there is no point 'railing' against that.
> >>>>
> >>>> 2) Not every one is tarred with the same brush and a majority
> >>
> >> prefer
> >>
> >>>> to learn from the documented material without bothering anyone
> >>
> >> else
> >>
> >>>> (the forum, support) - policies should be directed towards the
> >>>> silent, and good, majority.
> >>>>
> >>>> 3) If all up to date relevant information isn't in the manual
> >>
> >> people
> >>
> >>>> will have to try elsewhere (if all the info was in the manual
and
> >>
> >> it
> >>
> >>>> was easy to find there would be no need to go elsewhere except
to
> >>>> discuss application, which it is not a duty of AB to teach
> >>
> >> anyway).
> >>
> >>>> 4) If elsewhere takes too long and doesn't return much then
they
> >>>
> >>> only
> >>>
> >>>> have two choices - email support, or ask the question here and
> >>
> >> hope
> >>
> >>>> for an answer (of course no one can expect an answer, let alone
> >>>> demand one because we are all volunteers).
> >>>>
> >>>> 5) People who post good solutions to this board can't complain
if
> >>
> >> no
> >>
> >>>> one ever reads them again - they have been offered better
> >>>> alternatives.
> >>>>
> >>>> SUMMARY??????
> >>>>
> >>>> It is helpful if people provide a link, or directions where to
> >>
> >> find
> >>
> >>>> the info as an answer but saying 'read the manual'
and/or 'search'
> >>>> doesn't achieve and constructive outcomes.
> >>>>
> >>>> The best solution would be not to swim against the tide of
human
> >>>> nature and the times AND address the root cause of the problem.
> >>>>
> >>>> As I said before - this is a discussion point and not an
> >>>
> >>> expectation.
> >>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>>
> >>>> brian_z
> >>>>
> >>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>> Tomasz Janeczko
> >>>>> amibroker.com
> >>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>>> From: "brian_z111" <brian_z111@>
> >>>>> To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 1:51 AM
> >>>>> Subject: [amibroker] Re: help needed on adx coding.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Tomasz Janeczko" <groups@>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> It was discussed in detail before. Use search.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Tomasz,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> No one could ask you personally to do more for us than you
> >>>>
> >>>> already do
> >>>>
> >>>>>> so I am not complaininhg or criticizing. I would, however,
> >>
> >> like
> >>
> >>>> to
> >>>>
> >>>>>> put forward another perspective on this issue of searching.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Many times you and others say - "it has been discussed before
> >>>>
> >>>> many
> >>>>
> >>>>>> times and search the board".
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It is true that often people are more enthusiastic about
> >>
> >> getting
> >>
> >>>>>> others to help than they are about helping themselves but
> >>
> >> please
> >>
> >>>>>> consider this:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 1) I am not one of them and IMO finding the information we
> >>
> >> need
> >>
> >>>>>> (assuming it is 100% there in the first place) is absolutely
> >>
> >> the
> >>
> >>>>>> worst part of the Amibroker experience.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2) I wasn't here before. That's not my fault - just life's
> >>>>>> coincidence.
> >>>>>> I can't possibly read every message from the past - anyway
> >>
> >> many
> >>
> >>>>>> things have changed and a lot of the info is out of context
or
> >>>>>> redundant so it is a long search for an occasional gem.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 3) I am researching for some answers on Amiquote at the
> >>
> >> moment,
> >>
> >>>> to
> >>>>
> >>>>>> add some detail on the subject to the UKB. I got thousands of
> >>>>
> >>>> hits
> >>>>
> >>>>>> under AmiQuote, when searching this forum, but most of them
> >>
> >> are
> >>
> >>>>>> irrelevant because it appears that in the past a link with
> >>>>
> >>>> Amiquote
> >>>>
> >>>>>> in it was at the bottom of all messages. So in the end I just
> >>>>>> searched "Tomasz" and "AmiQuote current" for 549 messages
> >>
> >> (that
> >>
> >>>> is
> >>>>
> >>>>>> not thorough research but it will have to do - I now that the
> >>>>
> >>>> info I
> >>>>
> >>>>>> want is in a post by Dimitri but that is another day or two
> >>
> >> out
> >>
> >>>> of my
> >>>>
> >>>>>> life to search all Dimitris Yahoo posts). So far it has taken
> >>
> >> me
> >>
> >>>> 2
> >>>>
> >>>>>> hours to read the first 50 messages (the search doesn't
return
> >>>>>> a 'true' thread so I have to manually manage the jump from
> >>>
> >>> search
> >>>
> >>>> to
> >>>>
> >>>>>> topic to thread and back for every single one (don't think I
> >>>>
> >>>> don't
> >>>>
> >>>>>> feel like throwing in the towel either because the end gain
> >>
> >> will
> >>
> >>>> be
> >>>>
> >>>>>> very small but stubborness has it's uses).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 4) I wasn't around when Fred first posted his answer the
first
> >>>>
> >>>> time.
> >>>>
> >>>>>> I did notice the recent post.
> >>>>>> I didn't answer because I have other duties to meet beside
> >>>>
> >>>> helping in
> >>>>
> >>>>>> the forum.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If I wanted to find that post again (and I knew it was there
> >>
> >> and
> >>
> >>>>>> that it was by Fred) how hard would that be? How much harder
> >>>>
> >>>> would
> >>>>
> >>>>>> it be if the person 'on the hunt' didn't have that prior
info?
> >>>>
> >>>> Near
> >>>>
> >>>>>> impossible. What would they search for? "Generalized Price
> >>>>
> >>>> Required
> >>>>
> >>>>>> to Meet am Indicator Goal".
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 5) I have tried everything to make my searching easierm
> >>>
> >>> including
> >>>
> >>>>>> PGOffline which had unresolved glitches on my computer.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It doesn't get any better when I search the Ami homepage and
> >>>>
> >>>> Googling
> >>>>
> >>>>>> Ami.com or Ami.net isn't a barrel of laughs either.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So, I am not looking for an argument.
> >>>>>> I have just put my point up on the board against yours.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> brian_z
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> See for example this:
> >>
> >> http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/message/116612
> >>
> >>>>>>> and the entire thread.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>> Tomasz Janeczko
> >>>>>>> amibroker.com
> >>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>>>>> From: "Prashant Nayak" <pnayak@>
> >>>>>>> To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 5:32 PM
> >>>>>>> Subject: [amibroker] Re: help needed on adx coding.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Dear friends,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Bit dissapointed, nobody comming forward to help a person
> >>>>
> >>>> stuck
> >>>>
> >>>>>> with
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> the coding.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> is it really uncodeable ?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Prashant
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Prashant Nayak"
> >>
> >> <pnayak@>
> >>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Hi friend,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> even this does not work. Seniors please help to rectify
> >>
> >> this
> >>
> >>>>>> code
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> or
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> a new code please.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Tomas, pls help.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Pras
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "vichooo_1999"
> >>>>
> >>>> <vichooo_1999@>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> I think u r looking for a forecaster which gives a value
> >>>
> >>> at
> >>>
> >>>>>> which
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> +DI
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> will cross -DI.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Try the following
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> P0 = C;
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Acc = 0.0001;
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> LVBI = LastValue(BarIndex());
> >>>>>>>>>> Mult = 1;
> >>>>>>>>>> for (i = 0; i < 10; i++)
> >>>>>>>>>> {
> >>>>>>>>>> if (P0[LVBI] >= 1)
> >>>>>>>>>> i = 99;
> >>>>>>>>>> else
> >>>>>>>>>> Mult = Mult * 10;
> >>>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>> // ***********************************************
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> P1 = Ref(P0, 1) * Mult;
> >>>>>>>>>> UpDn = 100 * P1[LVBI];
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> for (i = 0; i < 200; i++)
> >>>>>>>>>> {
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Calc = PDI();
> >>>>>>>>>> Calc = MDI();
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Goal = LastValue(cross(PDI(),MDI()));
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> if (Calc[LVBI] < Goal)
> >>>>>>>>>> P1[LVBI] = P1[LVBI] + UpDn;
> >>>>>>>>>> else
> >>>>>>>>>> P1[LVBI] = P1[LVBI] - UpDn;
> >>>>>>>>>> UpDn = UpDn / 2;
> >>>>>>>>>> if (UpDn <= Acc)
> >>>>>>>>>> {
> >>>>>>>>>> j = i;
> >>>>>>>>>> i = 99999;
> >>>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Accuracy = 100 * (abs(Goal - Calc) / Goal);
> >>>>>>>>>> Filter = BarIndex() == LVBI;
> >>>>>>>>>> AddColumn(Ref(P1, -1) / Mult, "Todays Price", 1.2);
> >>>>>>>>>> AddColumn(P1 / Mult, "Goal Price", 1.2);
> >>>>>>>>>> AddColumn(P0-P1 , "Goal Price diff", 1.2);
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> tyr and see if it works. I f it does not then some
> >>>>
> >>>> seniorguys
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>> have
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> rectify the code.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> cheers
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "wavemechanic"
> >>
> >> <fimdot@>
> >>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> A starting point is the folder in the Files section
> >>>>
> >>>> titled
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>> "Cross
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Predictions"
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Bill
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>>>>>>>>> From: "Prashant Nayak" <pnayak@>
> >>>>>>>>>>> To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 12:38 PM
> >>>>>>>>>>> Subject: [amibroker] Re: help needed on adx coding.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Prashanth, but valuewhen syntax will not work
> >>>>
> >>>> here.
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>> what
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> i
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> need to code for a adx forecaster which gives out
> >>
> >> the
> >>
> >>>>>> price
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> it will become a buy.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Pls help me code a forecaster for adx.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Prashant
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Prashanth"
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> <prash454.ta@>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you checked out "Valuewhen" Syntax.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Prashanth
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Prashant Nayak
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 10:36 PM
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: [amibroker] Re: help needed on adx
> >>
> >> coding.
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Friends,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I look forward to your help pls.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Pras
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Prashant
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Nayak" <pnayak@>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Friends,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would highly appreciate if anybody can help
> >>
> >> me
> >>
> >>>> on
> >>>>
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> below
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> issue,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> as i am otherwise stuck on my coding.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prashant.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Prashant
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Nayak" <pnayak@>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear friends,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am trying to code adx explorer on
> >>
> >> crossover,
> >>
> >>>> but
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>> need
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> help
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how to determine the price at which +di will
> >>>>
> >>>> cross -
> >>>>
> >>>>>> di
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Appreciate help on the same from experts.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prashant
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>
Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|