|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Thanks.
I appreciate your comments.
brian_z
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Thomas Ludwig <Thomas.Ludwig@xxx>
wrote:
>
>
> > Bob,
> >
> > If I top post some people ask me to change because in their email
> > datbases they don't know who is answering what.
> > (it actually looks better at the website and I personally prefer
it
> > but I changed to help the email savers).
> >
> > If I bottom post it looks crappy at the website and it is harder
for
> > me but those who save have a better record - I can't win.
> >
> > I miss having Yuki around - one of the few women in a forum full
of
> > grumpy males and a Japanese woman to boot - also one who was quite
> > comfortable with us.
> >
> > Yes, I do talk far too much sometimes.
>
> Brian, don't worry - it's always great to read your comments, and I
think
> everybody here appreciates your dedication!
>
> Regards,
>
> Thomas
>
>
> >
> > brian_z
> >
> >
> > If I bottom post --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Bob Jagow"
> >
> > <bjagow@> wrote:
> > > Not her bottom posting <g>
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > [mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> >
> > > Behalf Of brian_z111
> > > Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 11:32 PM
> > > To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [amibroker] Re: help needed on adx coding.
> > >
> > > Do you miss her?
> > >
> > > brian_z
> > >
> > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Bob Jagow" <bjagow@> wrote:
> > > > How come, Brian, that you usually end up in my "too big to
read"
> > >
> > > spam
> > >
> > > > folder?
> > > > My only excuse is that I'm hardly acute enuf to pluck a single
> > >
> > > wheat kennel
> > >
> > > > from a pile of chaff.
> > > > Even worse, only you [now that Yuki has departed, supposedly
to
> > >
> > > spend her
> > >
> > > > ill-gotten gains], bury the chaff at the end of the quoted
msg.
> > > >
> > > > Chidingly,
> > > > Bob
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > [mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> > >
> > > > Behalf Of brian_z111
> > > > Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 4:32 PM
> > > > To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Subject: [amibroker] Re: help needed on adx coding.
> > > >
> > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Tomasz Janeczko" <groups@>
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Yes, BUT... you truncated my original response.
> > > > > I did not only say that it was discussed before.
> > > > > I also wrote:
> > > > > " See for example this:
> > > > >
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/message/116612
> > > > > "
> > > > >
> > > > > So I also added EXACT LINK to the post that presents the
> >
> > solution
> >
> > > > > (so I did perform a search for person who asked and provided
> >
> > him a
> >
> > > > result that answers the question).
> > > >
> > > > > So I don't even expect the user to use search as I did this
for
> > > >
> > > > him/her already.
> > > >
> > > > > Do you expect me to copy-paste old posts instead of putting
the
> > > >
> > > > link ? I hope not.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > No, of course not.
> > > >
> > > > No, I don't expect you to do anything other than what you
perceive
> > >
> > > to
> > >
> > > > be the right course of action. I am simply haolding a
discussion
> > >
> > > with
> > >
> > > > the purpose of exchanging information. My expectation of
others is
> > > > that they are free to accept or reject my opinions and apply
(or
> > >
> > > not)
> > >
> > > > them in any way they like.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, your response was above and beyond - as I said "no one
can
> >
> > ask
> >
> > > > you to do more". Also, it is not a critique of you
(publically and
> > > > privately I respect you). Since it was not a critique of you I
> > >
> > > didn't
> > >
> > > > reference your behaviour (which was exemplary anyway).
> > > >
> > > > I truncated your answer because I was only addressing the 'go
> > > > search', and by implication, the 'go read the manual' mantra.
> > > >
> > > > I simply listed some factual observations, without drawing any
> > > > inferences or asking anybody to do anything.
> > > >
> > > > I am observing:
> > > >
> > > > 1) That all of the information I need to learn "how to use
AB",
> > > > rather than "how to apply AB", is not in the help manual.
> > > > 2) That the help manual contains 'out of date' material.
> > > > 3) That a lot of helpful material, that is additional to the
> >
> > manual
> >
> > > > is available in various places BUT searching to find that
> >
> > material,
> >
> > > > with the methods at my disposal, are very inefficient (perhaps
> >
> > there
> >
> > > > are some, as yet unknown to me, methods I can use).
> > > > 4) That "you' have asked "us" (the users) to make every
effort to
> > >
> > > use
> > >
> > > > the above resources before contacting support - to free your
time
> > >
> > > for
> > >
> > > > more productive pursuits - I 100% agree with this and anyway
I am
> > > > super proud to do it under my own steam.
> > > > 5)The majority of AB users are in full time employment and so
are
> > > > time challenged.
> > > > 6) It is human nature to avoid what is excessively painful,
for
> > > > little or no gain, and seek out what is pleasurable and/or
returns
> > > > hign gain.
> > > > 7) Internet forums are "live" - solutions posted there tend
to get
> > > > lost in the 'electronic void'.
> > > > 8)The ways in which we acquire info have changed (there is so
much
> > >
> > > of
> > >
> > > > it) - generally people are not going to read what we write
because
> > > > there is too much of it - they only want to do targetted
searching
> > > > for an answer to the now problem (and what is wrong with
that? -
> > >
> > > that
> > >
> > > > is exactly tha nature of the net and why we love it!)
> > > > 9) Even if people do read all the material, levels and speed
of
> > > > comprehension vary - we can't help that - it is not our fault.
> > > >
> > > > I would like to correct myself though - the out of date
material
> >
> > in
> >
> > > > the manual is the worst part of the AB experience, followed
by the
> > > > inefficient search tools.
> > > >
> > > > I haven't drawn any inferences from this (so far) but IYO are
any
> >
> > of
> >
> > > > the above points 1-9 factually incorrect.
> > > >
> > > > If they are not I propose a possible conclusion:
> > > >
> > > > 1) "We" will never be able to control peoples behaviour - some
> > >
> > > people
> > >
> > > > will always continue to expect others to do their "dirty"
work for
> > > > them so there is no point 'railing' against that.
> > > >
> > > > 2) Not every one is tarred with the same brush and a majority
> >
> > prefer
> >
> > > > to learn from the documented material without bothering anyone
> >
> > else
> >
> > > > (the forum, support) - policies should be directed towards the
> > > > silent, and good, majority.
> > > >
> > > > 3) If all up to date relevant information isn't in the manual
> >
> > people
> >
> > > > will have to try elsewhere (if all the info was in the manual
and
> >
> > it
> >
> > > > was easy to find there would be no need to go elsewhere
except to
> > > > discuss application, which it is not a duty of AB to teach
> >
> > anyway).
> >
> > > > 4) If elsewhere takes too long and doesn't return much then
they
> > >
> > > only
> > >
> > > > have two choices - email support, or ask the question here and
> >
> > hope
> >
> > > > for an answer (of course no one can expect an answer, let
alone
> > > > demand one because we are all volunteers).
> > > >
> > > > 5) People who post good solutions to this board can't
complain if
> >
> > no
> >
> > > > one ever reads them again - they have been offered better
> > > > alternatives.
> > > >
> > > > SUMMARY??????
> > > >
> > > > It is helpful if people provide a link, or directions where to
> >
> > find
> >
> > > > the info as an answer but saying 'read the manual'
and/or 'search'
> > > > doesn't achieve and constructive outcomes.
> > > >
> > > > The best solution would be not to swim against the tide of
human
> > > > nature and the times AND address the root cause of the
problem.
> > > >
> > > > As I said before - this is a discussion point and not an
> > >
> > > expectation.
> > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > brian_z
> > > >
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > Tomasz Janeczko
> > > > > amibroker.com
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "brian_z111" <brian_z111@>
> > > > > To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 1:51 AM
> > > > > Subject: [amibroker] Re: help needed on adx coding.
> > > > >
> > > > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Tomasz Janeczko"
<groups@>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> It was discussed in detail before. Use search.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tomasz,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > No one could ask you personally to do more for us than you
> > > >
> > > > already do
> > > >
> > > > > > so I am not complaininhg or criticizing. I would, however,
> >
> > like
> >
> > > > to
> > > >
> > > > > > put forward another perspective on this issue of
searching.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Many times you and others say - "it has been discussed
before
> > > >
> > > > many
> > > >
> > > > > > times and search the board".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It is true that often people are more enthusiastic about
> >
> > getting
> >
> > > > > > others to help than they are about helping themselves but
> >
> > please
> >
> > > > > > consider this:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1) I am not one of them and IMO finding the information we
> >
> > need
> >
> > > > > > (assuming it is 100% there in the first place) is
absolutely
> >
> > the
> >
> > > > > > worst part of the Amibroker experience.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2) I wasn't here before. That's not my fault - just life's
> > > > > > coincidence.
> > > > > > I can't possibly read every message from the past - anyway
> >
> > many
> >
> > > > > > things have changed and a lot of the info is out of
context or
> > > > > > redundant so it is a long search for an occasional gem.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 3) I am researching for some answers on Amiquote at the
> >
> > moment,
> >
> > > > to
> > > >
> > > > > > add some detail on the subject to the UKB. I got
thousands of
> > > >
> > > > hits
> > > >
> > > > > > under AmiQuote, when searching this forum, but most of
them
> >
> > are
> >
> > > > > > irrelevant because it appears that in the past a link with
> > > >
> > > > Amiquote
> > > >
> > > > > > in it was at the bottom of all messages. So in the end I
just
> > > > > > searched "Tomasz" and "AmiQuote current" for 549 messages
> >
> > (that
> >
> > > > is
> > > >
> > > > > > not thorough research but it will have to do - I now that
the
> > > >
> > > > info I
> > > >
> > > > > > want is in a post by Dimitri but that is another day or
two
> >
> > out
> >
> > > > of my
> > > >
> > > > > > life to search all Dimitris Yahoo posts). So far it has
taken
> >
> > me
> >
> > > > 2
> > > >
> > > > > > hours to read the first 50 messages (the search doesn't
return
> > > > > > a 'true' thread so I have to manually manage the jump from
> > >
> > > search
> > >
> > > > to
> > > >
> > > > > > topic to thread and back for every single one (don't
think I
> > > >
> > > > don't
> > > >
> > > > > > feel like throwing in the towel either because the end
gain
> >
> > will
> >
> > > > be
> > > >
> > > > > > very small but stubborness has it's uses).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 4) I wasn't around when Fred first posted his answer the
first
> > > >
> > > > time.
> > > >
> > > > > > I did notice the recent post.
> > > > > > I didn't answer because I have other duties to meet beside
> > > >
> > > > helping in
> > > >
> > > > > > the forum.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If I wanted to find that post again (and I knew it was
there
> >
> > and
> >
> > > > > > that it was by Fred) how hard would that be? How much
harder
> > > >
> > > > would
> > > >
> > > > > > it be if the person 'on the hunt' didn't have that prior
info?
> > > >
> > > > Near
> > > >
> > > > > > impossible. What would they search for? "Generalized Price
> > > >
> > > > Required
> > > >
> > > > > > to Meet am Indicator Goal".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 5) I have tried everything to make my searching easierm
> > >
> > > including
> > >
> > > > > > PGOffline which had unresolved glitches on my computer.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It doesn't get any better when I search the Ami homepage
and
> > > >
> > > > Googling
> > > >
> > > > > > Ami.com or Ami.net isn't a barrel of laughs either.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So, I am not looking for an argument.
> > > > > > I have just put my point up on the board against yours.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > brian_z
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> See for example this:
> >
> > http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/message/116612
> >
> > > > > >> and the entire thread.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Best regards,
> > > > > >> Tomasz Janeczko
> > > > > >> amibroker.com
> > > > > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > >> From: "Prashant Nayak" <pnayak@>
> > > > > >> To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > >> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 5:32 PM
> > > > > >> Subject: [amibroker] Re: help needed on adx coding.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > Dear friends,
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Bit dissapointed, nobody comming forward to help a
person
> > > >
> > > > stuck
> > > >
> > > > > > with
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > the coding.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > is it really uncodeable ?
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Prashant
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Prashant Nayak"
> >
> > <pnayak@>
> >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> >> Hi friend,
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> even this does not work. Seniors please help to
rectify
> >
> > this
> >
> > > > > > code
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > or
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >> a new code please.
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> Tomas, pls help.
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> Pras
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "vichooo_1999"
> > > >
> > > > <vichooo_1999@>
> > > >
> > > > > >> >> wrote:
> > > > > >> >> > I think u r looking for a forecaster which gives a
value
> > >
> > > at
> > >
> > > > > > which
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> >> +DI
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> > will cross -DI.
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> > Try the following
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> > P0 = C;
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> > Acc = 0.0001;
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> > LVBI = LastValue(BarIndex());
> > > > > >> >> > Mult = 1;
> > > > > >> >> > for (i = 0; i < 10; i++)
> > > > > >> >> > {
> > > > > >> >> > if (P0[LVBI] >= 1)
> > > > > >> >> > i = 99;
> > > > > >> >> > else
> > > > > >> >> > Mult = Mult * 10;
> > > > > >> >> > }
> > > > > >> >> > // ***********************************************
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> > P1 = Ref(P0, 1) * Mult;
> > > > > >> >> > UpDn = 100 * P1[LVBI];
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> > for (i = 0; i < 200; i++)
> > > > > >> >> > {
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> > Calc = PDI();
> > > > > >> >> > Calc = MDI();
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> > Goal = LastValue(cross(PDI(),MDI()));
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> > if (Calc[LVBI] < Goal)
> > > > > >> >> > P1[LVBI] = P1[LVBI] + UpDn;
> > > > > >> >> > else
> > > > > >> >> > P1[LVBI] = P1[LVBI] - UpDn;
> > > > > >> >> > UpDn = UpDn / 2;
> > > > > >> >> > if (UpDn <= Acc)
> > > > > >> >> > {
> > > > > >> >> > j = i;
> > > > > >> >> > i = 99999;
> > > > > >> >> > }
> > > > > >> >> > }
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> > Accuracy = 100 * (abs(Goal - Calc) / Goal);
> > > > > >> >> > Filter = BarIndex() == LVBI;
> > > > > >> >> > AddColumn(Ref(P1, -1) / Mult, "Todays Price", 1.2);
> > > > > >> >> > AddColumn(P1 / Mult, "Goal Price", 1.2);
> > > > > >> >> > AddColumn(P0-P1 , "Goal Price diff", 1.2);
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> > tyr and see if it works. I f it does not then some
> > > >
> > > > seniorguys
> > > >
> > > > > >> > have
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >> to
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> > rectify the code.
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> > cheers
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "wavemechanic"
> >
> > <fimdot@>
> >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> >> > > A starting point is the folder in the Files
section
> > > >
> > > > titled
> > > >
> > > > > >> > "Cross
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >> > Predictions"
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> > > Bill
> > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > >> >> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > >> >> > > From: "Prashant Nayak" <pnayak@>
> > > > > >> >> > > To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > >> >> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 12:38 PM
> > > > > >> >> > > Subject: [amibroker] Re: help needed on adx
coding.
> > > > > >> >> > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > Thanks Prashanth, but valuewhen syntax will not
work
> > > >
> > > > here.
> > > >
> > > > > >> > what
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >> i
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> > > > need to code for a adx forecaster which gives
out
> >
> > the
> >
> > > > > > price
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > at
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >> > which
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> > > > it will become a buy.
> > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > Pls help me code a forecaster for adx.
> > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > Prashant
> > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Prashanth"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > <prash454.ta@>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> >> > wrote:
> > > > > >> >> > > >> Have you checked out "Valuewhen" Syntax.
> > > > > >> >> > > >>
> > > > > >> >> > > >> Cheers
> > > > > >> >> > > >>
> > > > > >> >> > > >> Prashanth
> > > > > >> >> > > >>
> > > > > >> >> > > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > >> >> > > >> From: Prashant Nayak
> > > > > >> >> > > >> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > >> >> > > >> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 10:36 PM
> > > > > >> >> > > >> Subject: [amibroker] Re: help needed on adx
> >
> > coding.
> >
> > > > > >> >> > > >> Dear Friends,
> > > > > >> >> > > >>
> > > > > >> >> > > >> I look forward to your help pls.
> > > > > >> >> > > >>
> > > > > >> >> > > >> Pras
> > > > > >> >> > > >>
> > > > > >> >> > > >> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Prashant
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Nayak" <pnayak@>
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> >> > > >> > Dear Friends,
> > > > > >> >> > > >> >
> > > > > >> >> > > >> > I would highly appreciate if anybody can
help
> >
> > me
> >
> > > > on
> > > >
> > > > > > the
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> >> > below
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> > > >> issue,
> > > > > >> >> > > >>
> > > > > >> >> > > >> > as i am otherwise stuck on my coding.
> > > > > >> >> > > >> >
> > > > > >> >> > > >> > Prashant.
> > > > > >> >> > > >> >
> > > > > >> >> > > >> >
> > > > > >> >> > > >> > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Prashant
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> Nayak" <pnayak@>
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > Dear friends,
> > > > > >> >> > > >> > >
> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > I am trying to code adx explorer on
> >
> > crossover,
> >
> > > > but
> > > >
> > > > > >> > need
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >> > help
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> > > > on
> > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > >> the
> > > > > >> >> > > >>
> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > following:
> > > > > >> >> > > >> > >
> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > how to determine the price at which +di
will
> > > >
> > > > cross -
> > > >
> > > > > > di
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > Appreciate help on the same from experts.
> > > > > >> >> > > >> > >
> > > > > >> >> > > >> > > Prashant
> > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > Please note that this group is for discussion
> >
> > between
> >
> > > > > > users
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> >> only.
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> > > > To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-
mail
> > > > > >
> > > > > > directly
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > to
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >> > > > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news
always
> > > >
> > > > check
> > > >
> > > > > >> >> DEVLOG:
> > > > > >> >> > > > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > For other support material please check also:
> > > > > >> >> > > > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
> > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > >
> > > > > >> >> > > > --
> > > > > >> >> > > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > > > >> >> > > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > > > > >> >> > > > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database:
269.16.1/1140 -
> > > >
> > > > Release
> > > >
> > > > > >> >> Date:
> > > > > >> >> > 11/19/2007 7:05 PM
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Please note that this group is for discussion between
users
> > > >
> > > > only.
> > > >
> > > > > >> > To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail
> >
> > directly
> >
> > > > to
> > > >
> > > > > >> > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always
check
> > > >
> > > > DEVLOG:
> > > > > >> > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > For other support material please check also:
> > > > > >> > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please note that this group is for discussion between
users
> > >
> > > only.
> > >
> > > > > > To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail
directly
> >
> > to
> >
> > > > > > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check
> > >
> > > DEVLOG:
> > > > > > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For other support material please check also:
> > > > > > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > > Please note that this group is for discussion between users
only.
> > > >
> > > > To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly
to
> > > > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> > > >
> > > > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check
DEVLOG:
> > > > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> > > >
> > > > For other support material please check also:
> > > > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > > Please note that this group is for discussion between users
only.
> > >
> > > To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
> > > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> > >
> > > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check
DEVLOG:
> > > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> > >
> > > For other support material please check also:
> > > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> > Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
> >
> > To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
> > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> >
> > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> >
> > For other support material please check also:
> > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|