PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
This is an interesting discussion. Maybe
I can offer a unifying perspective. According to one financial theory (auction
market theory), stock markets are dual sided auctions where buyers and sellers
determine fair values of stocks through their buying and selling. The
current price of a stock reflects all the current actions of all the buyers and
sellers at the current time. The market participant actions are based on
their perceptions and future expectations for the stock or the underlying
company’s prospects. As long as the buyers and sellers expectations
stay the same, a stock price tends to fluctuate around its current fair value
price. When a stock price is perceived as cheap relative to its current
fair value, buyers step in and buy. When a stock price is perceived as
expensive, sellers step in and sell. Whenever perceptions change, buyers
and sellers will move a stock price until a new fair value price area is found.
So what does all this have to do with a
stock split? Well a stock split is an event that can change the
perceptions of market participants about a stock (for whatever the
reason). There is the mechanical/accounting side of a stock split that
does nothing to the total market value of a stock. However a stock split (or
more correctly; the announcement of a stock split) does cause many market
participants to take notice of the stock and perhaps change their perceptions
and future expectations. It’s not a bigger float that brings in
more market participants; it’s the changes in perception triggered by the
change in float event. Companies that split their stocks are generally perceived
as growing companies. A stock split is an event that alerts a company’s
growth to current and perhaps additional market participants.
Since a stock split can change market
participant perceptions, a stock’s fair value can change because of a
stock split. If the perception changes are large enough, then trend lines
can also be affected. If the perception changes are not large because
they are perhaps already well known and discounted by the market participants,
then trend lines may not change. It should also be noted that trend lines
are very timeframe dependant. A stock split announcement may change 5
minute timeframe trend lines greatly but not affect a trend line on a yearly
chart at all.
I don’t think I’ve said
anything about a stock split that was not said in the previous posts, I just
restated ideas using the auction market theory as a framework. The framework
personally gives me a simplified structure to explain what’s going on in
a market or a stock. I know that perceptions can be irrational (especially
when they don’t reflect my beliefsJ) and markets can move counter to what I expect. However I do
take notice of events (like economic reports and company announcements) because
they do cause changes in perceptions and thus change prices. As a trader,
that’s what I want… changes in prices.
Regards,
David
From: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rakesh Sahgal
Sent: 04/28/2007 5:05 AM
To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re:
Trendlines displaced after split
Naah I dont understand diltuion too. I guess I am not
alone in the arrogance boat ,now am I? :)
Enhanced float brings in newer segments of market participants. Wider market
participation means more varied response to developments with respect to the
company which is reflected in the price movement of the stock. This is turn
will ALWAYS mean differences in price patterns as compared to the time when the
float was lower. Wider participation will smoothen price movements to an extent
- mucher lower limit down lockdowns or limit up lockdowns. You choose to
believe differently , thats your business. I can only state what I have
observed over whatever time I have spent in this business.
R
On 4/28/07, Sirbrainfart
<sirbrainfart@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:
WRONG!!! (and quite arrogant-sounding)
A "simple" split does nothing to a company's total equity value and
therefore nothing to the supply/demand balance. If you divide the share price
by four and multiply the number of shares in circulation by the same factor
then the market value of the total outstanding equity remains unchanged. It may
affect liquidity slightly, but in most cases the average daily volume will just
go up by the same factor (i.e. everyone now buys 4 shares for every one they
used to buy...net effect, no change)
What a split does is alter the *perceived* value of a company...and perception,
as your post proves, is important for marketing purposes. Some people don't
feel comfortable buying shares that trade +$100...a $25 share price is often an
easier sell.
The same argument also for new stock issue...so called "dilution",
which you probably also don't understand. It's what the company *does* (or
proposes to do) with the new cash that affects the market value, not the
raising of cash itself, since issuing new shares (i.e. increasing the company
equity value) has a net balancing effect by the new cash raised. So one side of
the balance sheet is countered and netted out by the other. When the cash is
spent, or when the company announces how it intends to spend it, is when the
market will respond...i.e it will decide if there is good investment or
bad.
Anyway, the point is that back-adjusting the price to account for a spilt is a
perfectly valid thing to do, since all you are doing is mapping out how the
market perceived changes in the *total* market capitalisation over time. The
absolute share price is much less relevant than what it actually represents at
any given point in time.
Andy
Rakesh Sahgal wrote:
A "simple 4:1"
split as you so dismissively refer to it, enhances the a company's equity by a
multiple of 4 and also the quantum of float that is moving around in the
market, though not necessarily by the same quantum. That my friend, changes the
demand-supply dynamics of the company's stock as also the perceptions of the
market participants about it. Which I hope you will be kind enough to concede
will start impacting the price movements too. So in summation yes a split warrants
new trend lines. However if you want to stick to an analysis that was relevant
to a situation that existed in the past, and not re-do the analysis in the
light of the changed situation, all you have to do is let the old trend lines
remain.
R
__._,_.___
Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
SPONSORED LINKS
__,_._,___
|
|