| 
 PureBytes Links 
Trading Reference Links 
 | 
| 
 Yes, thanks Thomasz. I got that already from the 
S&C Jan 2007 article. Indeed a very intresting technique ... 
  
Ton. 
  
  ----- Original Message -----  
  
  
  Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 9:09 
  PM 
  Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: FFT 
  
  
  
  
   Hello, 
    
  Please make sure to check this article: 
  
  as it presents improvement over Fourier 
  transform. 
   Best regards, Tomasz 
  Janeczko amibroker.com 
  
    ----- Original Message -----  
    
    
    Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 8:50 
    PM 
    Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: FFT 
    
  
    Yes, that's right - handle is the wrong word and 
    should be find, reveal, uncover, etc.  This ability is of particular 
    interest to short-term traders. 
      
    Bill 
      
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    
    
    Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 2:04 
    PM 
    Subject: [amibroker] Re: 
    FFT  
    
  > MESA doesn't really have the ability to handle shorter cycles 
    per  > se ... >  > What it does have is the ability to 
    pull cyclical information out of  > shorter samples of data. > 
     > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com, "wavemechanic" <fimdot@xxx> wrote: >> >> 
    No, I'm not saying that MESA will give better results than  > a 
    "better" FFT (is MESA a "better" FFT?).  That judgment cannot be 
     > made until you leave the hypothetical and have a "better" FFT to 
     > talk about.  Until then statistics help identify valid cycles 
    and  > MESA offers some advantages, including noise filtering and 
    ability  > to handle shorter cycles.  Good luck in your 
    search. >>  >> Bill >>  >> ----- 
    Original Message -----  >>   From: Ton Sieverding 
     >>   To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com  >>   Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 3:24 
    AM >>   Subject: Re: [amibroker] FFT >> 
     >>  >>   So what you are saying is - 'Beyond 
    that one can go to MESA' -  > that even after I should have found 
    whatever modified version of  > FFT, MESA will give me better results. 
    In other words, why playing  > with FFT if MESA is the right way to 
    go. Is that your opinion or am  > I missing something ? >> 
     >>   Ton >>  >> 
     >>     ----- Original Message ----- 
     >>     From: wavemechanic 
     >>     To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com  >>     Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 
    2:42 PM >>     Subject: Re: [amibroker] 
    FFT >>  >>  >> 
     >>     The restrictions associated with FFT 
    that Ehlers mentions can  > be found in any textbook.  As for 
    better results with FFT, the next  > step is to evaluate the cycles 
    statistically (e.g., Bartels, F- > ratio, chi-square, etc.).  
    Beyond that one can go to MESA and such. >> 
     >>     
    Bill >>       ----- Original Message 
    -----  >>       From: Ton Sieverding 
     >>       To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxps.com  >>       Sent: Monday, March 
    26, 2007 2:58 AM >>       Subject: 
    Re: [amibroker] FFT >>  >> 
     >>       Frankly for me these are 
    John Ehlers typical arguments to  > use his MESA model in stead of FFT 
    and has nothing to do with a  > discussion. The question for me still 
    remains if there really is no  > way to get better results with FFT 
    than the ones we have got ? If  > Fourier analysis is correct and it's 
    possible to simulate whatever  > continues timeseries with a bunch of 
    sinewaves and if MESA can give  > me the correct harmonics, it should 
    also be possible to obtain the  > same results with a modified version 
    of FFT. Question is how ? >> 
     >>       Ton Sieverding. >> 
     >>         ----- Original 
    Message -----  >>         
    From: wavemechanic 
     >>         To: AmiBroker, 
    User  >>         Sent: 
    Monday, March 26, 2007 1:27 
    AM >>         Subject: Re: 
    [amibroker] FFT >>  >>  >> 
     >>         There is a 
    discussion of FFT use and problems on Ehlers  > MESA 
    website: >> 
     >>         
    http://www.mesasoftware.com/fftcomparison.htm >>  >>         
    Bill >> 
     >>         ----- Original 
    Message ----- 
     >>           
    From: Ara Kaloustian 
     >>           To: 
    AB-Main 
     >>           
    Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 3:16 
    PM >>           
    Subject: [amibroker] FFT >>  >> 
     >>           I 
    was playing with AB's FFT code that TJ provided... >> 
     >>           The 
    cycles seem to shift relative to the data, based on  > how many data 
    points are analyzed. This is of course expected. >> 
     >>           
    Question: >> 
     >>           Has 
    anyone found a way to determine optimum number of  > data points to 
    analyze, and then determine the relevance of the  > dominant cycle, or 
    find any relevant cycles? >> 
     >>           
    Most of the time the dominant cycle seems to be the  > largest one 
    available.  >> 
     >>           Has 
    anyone been able to use these cycles succesfully? >> 
     >>           Ara 
     >>  >>  >> 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------- > 
    --- >>  >> 
     >>           No 
    virus found in this incoming 
    message. >>           
    Checked by AVG Free 
    Edition. >>           
    Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.17/732 -  > Release Date: 
    3/24/2007 4:36 PM >>  >>  >>  >> 
     >> 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------- > 
    ------- >>  >> 
     >>       No virus found in this 
    incoming message. >>       Checked by 
    AVG Free Edition. >>       Version: 
    7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.18/733 - Release  > Date: 3/25/2007 
    11:07 AM >>  >>  >>    
     >>  >>  >> 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------- > 
    ----------- >>  >>  >>   No virus found 
    in this incoming message. >>   Checked by AVG Free 
    Edition. >>   Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 
    268.18.18/734 - Release Date:  > 3/26/2007 2:31 PM >> > 
     >  >  >  > Please note that this group is for 
    discussion between users only. >  > To get support from 
    AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to  > SUPPORT {at} 
    amibroker.com >  > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news 
    always check DEVLOG: > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/ >  > For other support material please check also: > 
    http://www.amibroker.com/support.html >  > Yahoo! Groups Links >  > <*> To 
    visit your group on the web, go to: >    
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/ >  > <*> Your email 
    settings: >    Individual Email | Traditional > 
     > <*> To change settings online go 
    to: >    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join >    (Yahoo! ID required) >  > 
    <*> To change settings via email: >    
    mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxps.com  >    mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com >  > <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
    to: >    amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxcom >  > <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject 
    to: >    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ >  >  >  >  > --  > No virus 
    found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > 
    Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.18/734 - Release Date: 3/26/2007 
    2:31 PM >  >  
    
__._,_.___
  
Please note that this group is for discussion between users only. 
 
To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to  
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com 
 
For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG: 
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/ 
 
For other support material please check also: 
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html 
  
     
    
  
  
  
    SPONSORED LINKS
   
       
  
 
      
   
__,_._,___
 |   
 |