[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[amibroker] Re: FFT



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

MESA doesn't really have the ability to handle shorter cycles per 
se ...

What it does have is the ability to pull cyclical information out of 
shorter samples of data.

--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "wavemechanic" <fimdot@xxx> wrote:
>
> No, I'm not saying that MESA will give better results than 
a "better" FFT (is MESA a "better" FFT?).  That judgment cannot be 
made until you leave the hypothetical and have a "better" FFT to 
talk about.  Until then statistics help identify valid cycles and 
MESA offers some advantages, including noise filtering and ability 
to handle shorter cycles.  Good luck in your search.
> 
> Bill
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Ton Sieverding 
>   To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>   Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 3:24 AM
>   Subject: Re: [amibroker] FFT
> 
> 
>   So what you are saying is - 'Beyond that one can go to MESA' - 
that even after I should have found whatever modified version of 
FFT, MESA will give me better results. In other words, why playing 
with FFT if MESA is the right way to go. Is that your opinion or am 
I missing something ?
> 
>   Ton
> 
> 
>     ----- Original Message ----- 
>     From: wavemechanic 
>     To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>     Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 2:42 PM
>     Subject: Re: [amibroker] FFT
> 
> 
> 
>     The restrictions associated with FFT that Ehlers mentions can 
be found in any textbook.  As for better results with FFT, the next 
step is to evaluate the cycles statistically (e.g., Bartels, F-
ratio, chi-square, etc.).  Beyond that one can go to MESA and such.
> 
>     Bill
>       ----- Original Message ----- 
>       From: Ton Sieverding 
>       To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>       Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 2:58 AM
>       Subject: Re: [amibroker] FFT
> 
> 
>       Frankly for me these are John Ehlers typical arguments to 
use his MESA model in stead of FFT and has nothing to do with a 
discussion. The question for me still remains if there really is no 
way to get better results with FFT than the ones we have got ? If 
Fourier analysis is correct and it's possible to simulate whatever 
continues timeseries with a bunch of sinewaves and if MESA can give 
me the correct harmonics, it should also be possible to obtain the 
same results with a modified version of FFT. Question is how ?
> 
>       Ton Sieverding.
> 
>         ----- Original Message ----- 
>         From: wavemechanic 
>         To: AmiBroker, User 
>         Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 1:27 AM
>         Subject: Re: [amibroker] FFT
> 
> 
> 
>         There is a discussion of FFT use and problems on Ehlers 
MESA website:
> 
>         http://www.mesasoftware.com/fftcomparison.htm
> 
>         Bill
> 
>         ----- Original Message ----- 
>           From: Ara Kaloustian 
>           To: AB-Main 
>           Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 3:16 PM
>           Subject: [amibroker] FFT
> 
> 
>           I was playing with AB's FFT code that TJ provided...
> 
>           The cycles seem to shift relative to the data, based on 
how many data points are analyzed. This is of course expected.
> 
>           Question:
> 
>           Has anyone found a way to determine optimum number of 
data points to analyze, and then determine the relevance of the 
dominant cycle, or find any relevant cycles?
> 
>           Most of the time the dominant cycle seems to be the 
largest one available. 
> 
>           Has anyone been able to use these cycles succesfully?
> 
>           Ara 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
---
> 
> 
>           No virus found in this incoming message.
>           Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>           Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.17/732 - 
Release Date: 3/24/2007 4:36 PM
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
> 
> 
>       No virus found in this incoming message.
>       Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>       Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.18/733 - Release 
Date: 3/25/2007 11:07 AM
> 
> 
>    
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
> 
> 
>   No virus found in this incoming message.
>   Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>   Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.18/734 - Release Date: 
3/26/2007 2:31 PM
>




Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.

To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to 
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com

For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/

For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/