[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[amibroker] Re: I think the real defect of Amibroker is charting



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Hello Trading Humble,

I am not having a go at you or pushing any agenda; I am trying to 
understand what the chartists want for my own reasons
(if they are using charts in a way that I am not and it is 
contributing to their trading success I want to know about it).

The problem is no-one can specify what it is they are after 
(including screenshots).

Rakesh lists some studies; fair enough, you've definitely drawn some 
empathy from me.
Without the facts, however, I can't decide either way, but I assume 
Tomasz must have his reasons why he didn't implement the suggestions.

I read Joe's post of 03 #49871 but without a screenshot I can't 
readily understand what he wants.

********************************************************************

Re your points.

I am an art lover.
I particularly like visionary art.
If you want graphics have a look at 

http://iasos.com/artists/

but I am not looking for an art experience when I open AB.

I think it looks quite nice and it is visually pleasant while working 
in it.
We have a choice of skins.


I have had a quick look at the Ensign site and I don't agree that the 
chart quality is superior although the web page is more artistic.

Crispy can only be an issue of resolution or contrast.
Isn't the resolution the same for most of us (depending on computer 
graphics card)?
How can another software package have superior resolution to Ami?
Would it show on my computer if it did?

Contrast comes down to the colours used; two adjacent lines look 
different depending on the colours used or perspective.

How do we add perspective to 2D charts.
Anyway, once again 3D is arty but seldom functional in software.
Of course Ami does have 3D where it counts; in the optimised output.

Doesn't Ami have a full colour palette the equal of other software 
and don't we have the option to change colour settings?

Ensign uses a lot of colour which looks *arty*, but does it have a 
function other than entertainment?

I love pink, but I am not sure about it in my candlesticks.

I don't agree that the Ensign charts look any better than Ami's.

It can't be in the fonts, as they are standard.
Where is the difference?

Ensign appears to have some extra studies and drawing tools; are they 
what people want?

If so why not put forward a well researched and referenced request 
with screenshots.
Advertise it here and submit it to suggestions and I am sure you will 
get a hearing.
Some of the fence sitters, like me, may even join in the chorus 
asking Tomasz to implement them.

As for ease of use; how exactly is the way we use Ami's drawing tools 
any different from other programs (point & click)?

As I said, I am looking to buy your arguments but no one has made a 
tempting offer so far.

Regards,

BrianB2.

--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "tradinghumble" <sharp2be@xxx> 
wrote:
>
> Just adding to the opinions here, I think AB is the king of 
> backtesting and programming but I have to agree that it lacks when 
> comes to charting... and I'm not talking about indicators, I'm 
> talking about "charting, quality, graphics, etc" ... I've brought 
> this issue up many times but noone seems to understand it... I 
guess 
> you have to use TradesStation or even Ensign and QT to understand 
> what I mean by crispy ... on the other hand, I've hard people 
> comparing AB to Metastock.. now, that's silly, AB is miles away 
from 
> Metastock , 15 times better... so, in summary, if your think is EOD 
> charts and your main focus is automation, there's no better place 
> than AB...
> 
> 
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Rik Rasmussen" <hrasmussen@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > You do not mention any way you find it to be inferior.
> > 
> > What is it about the charts that you find lacking?
> > 
> > Rik Rasmussen
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > > [mailto:amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of itmwh
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 9:50 AM
> > > To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [amibroker] I think the real defect of Amibroker is 
> charting
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I think amibroker as a system developing/backtesting/automatic 
> > > excecution software is superb, actually, in my opinion, best in 
> the 
> > > market, especially considering the price. But as a new user of 
> > > Amibroker, I also found the charting proportion of Amibroker 
> > > is not as 
> > > competive as other functions.  I have some experience with 
> > > ensign, and 
> > > feel that is the best charting software. I am not a 
discretionary 
> > > trader, and I do not think ensign is worthy of the monthly 
> > > subscription 
> > > price, so I will stay with Amibroker , but I hope amibroker 
> > > can improve 
> > > its charting function. A improved charting capability ,will 
> appeal to 
> > > the vast majority of the retail traders and also greatly 
improve 
> the 
> > > sales of this software, even at a higher price. Just my 
personal 
> > > thoughts, sorry if not correct.
> >
>



Content-Description: "AVG certification"
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.2/692 - Release Date: 2/18/2007 4:35 PM