|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hello,
1. Bug ? There is no bug reported in Feedback center. Feedback center is the only place to report suggestions / bug reports.
Seems like Marcin failed to enter it. Best bet anyway is to enter report to Feedback Center directly. The less middle-men the better.
2. The fact that you should use SetBarsRequired is of course true. It is pretty obvious as QuickAFL is on for all indicators (opposite to AA).
ATC can not force it on its own because then you would get warnings that formula references future bars if ATC did that.
3. Continuous DateTImeArray as a funciton is not possible. You can however generate artificial ticker if you want - just generate ASCII file
with dates / times you want and import it using ASCII importer.
Best regards,
Tomasz Janeczko
amibroker.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Herman
To: bruce1r
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2007 6:10 PM
Subject: Re: [amibroker] Note to Herman (and TJ) about atcFlagEnableInIndicator
Thank you Bruce, the atcFlagEnableInIndicator bug was reported to and was acknowledged by support. It will hopefully be fixed in the next release. It will be nice to create composites on the fly in an indicator.
The "flatline" ATC problem I had was related to corrupted eSignal backfills and the flat sections were "filled" bars which had no volume. Such sections would change depending on the integrity of the "Pad and Align" ticker that AB uses to fill missing data. This is a confusing issue (for me anyway) that I haven't been able to solve. I suggested a function that returns a continuous DateTimeArray which would allow us to test data integrity independent of assumed-hole-less reference ticker, i.e. without reference to and independent of collected data.
best regards,
herman.
Sunday, February 4, 2007, 11:41:58 AM, you wrote:
> A week or two ago, Herman noted some strange behavior when attempting
> to use atcFlagEnableInIndicator. I have seen the same problems. He
> noted that he sometimes got "flat line" ATC's and at other times got
> results that looked like values were added to previous ATC values. I
> never saw further mention, but here's what I've found.
> The short story is that I've found that turning off QuickAFL with a
> SetBarsRequired(100000,100000) gets rid of most of these problems.
> It looks like there might still be a few issues left that look to be
> cache-related that are too detailed for here. I'll post a bug later
> with a reproduction sequence that I hope helps.
> -- Bruce
> Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
> To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> For other support material please check also:
> http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/
> Individual Email | Traditional
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join
> (Yahoo! ID required)
> mailto:amibroker-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> mailto:amibroker-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
Content-Description: "AVG certification"
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.24/668 - Release Date: 2/4/2007 1:30 AM
|