|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
LOL.....I thought you were writing a book on systems???
Hmmmm...I think I may have confused you with someone else..
Sorry Fred...
----- Original Message -----
From: Fred
Date: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 3:12 pm
Subject: [amibroker] Re: Amibroker vs. other software
To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Without some independent third party to check the results I
> wouldn't
> find that to offer any additional credibility ... and ... Last I
> checked I wasn't writing any books ...
>
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, allansn@xxx wrote:
> >
> > Fred,
> >
> > If I was authoring a book on system design and system trading
> I
> would certainly post my track record.I would think that it would
> lend a boatload of credibility to the content.Otherwise,it is
> no
> different than marketing a system and asking one to believe the
> results.
> >
> > However if you are writing a book on programming and its
> application to trading,that is another story.
> >
> > Not trying to undress you,though you did suggest I show you
> mine
> and you will show me yours:)
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Fred
> > Date: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 11:45 am
> > Subject: [amibroker] Re: Amibroker vs. other software
> > To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > > I'll show you mine if youshow me yours ...
> > >
> > > But then there's really no need is there ? ... I'm not
> marketing
> > > a
> > > system and asking you to believe the results I obtained
> using
> it ...
> > >
> > > As I said before ... you want to buy a platform that has
> canned
> > > systems ... by all means do so ...
> > >
> > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, allansn@ wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Fred,
> > > >
> > > > If I am not mistaken,you will be coming out with a book on
> > > system
> > > development.Judging by your post,which I am in FULL 100%
> > > agreement,is it safe to assume you will be posting your
> AUDITED
> > > brokerage statement for the last 5-10 years?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Angelo
> > > > Date: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 9:46 am
> > > > Subject: [amibroker] Re: Amibroker vs. other software
> > > > To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Fred" wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > LOL ... Anyone can make performance stats say whatever
> > > they
> > > > > want ...
> > > > > > Unless you've seen some vendors audited brokerage
> > > statement
> > > > > you
> > > > > can
> > > > > > take them with a grain of salt ... If you are looking
> for
> > > an
> > > > > out
> > > > > of
> > > > > > the box solution that makes money, you're dreaming ...
> As
> > > I
> > > > > asked
> > > > > > before ... If one had the golden goose, why would they
> > > sell it
> > > > > for
> > > > > > $3k, $30k or even $300k ...
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > That's obvious and out of subject: nobody's dreaming
> here,
> > > > > nobody's
> > > > > asking to buy the Holy Grail.
> > > > >
> > > > > It's just that I don't like results like those exposed
> > > coupled
> > > > > with
> > > > > fancy words like "genetic algorithms". You might call it
> > > > > personal
> > > > > preference. By and thanks for the input.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
Content-Description: "AVG certification"
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.13.27/517 - Release Date: 11/3/2006
|