[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[amibroker] Re: Amibroker vs. other software



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Without some independent third party to check the results I wouldn't 
find that to offer any additional credibility ... and ... Last I 
checked I wasn't writing any books ... 

--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, allansn@xxx wrote:
>
> Fred,
> 
> If I was authoring a book on system design and system trading I 
would certainly post my track record.I would think that it would 
lend  a boatload of credibility to the content.Otherwise,it is no 
different than marketing a system and asking one to believe the 
results.
> 
> However if you are writing a book on programming and its 
application to trading,that is another story.
> 
> Not trying to undress you,though you did suggest I show you mine 
and you will show me yours:)
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Fred 
> Date: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 11:45 am
> Subject: [amibroker] Re: Amibroker vs. other software
> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> > I'll show you mine if youshow me yours ...
> > 
> > But then there's really no need is there ? ... I'm not marketing 
> > a 
> > system and asking you to believe the results I obtained using 
it ...
> > 
> > As I said before ... you want to buy a platform that has canned 
> > systems ... by all means do so ... 
> > 
> > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, allansn@ wrote:
> > >
> > > Fred,
> > > 
> > > If I am not mistaken,you will be coming out with a book on 
> > system 
> > development.Judging by your post,which I am in FULL 100% 
> > agreement,is it safe to assume you will be posting your AUDITED 
> > brokerage statement for the last 5-10 years?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Angelo 
> > > Date: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 9:46 am
> > > Subject: [amibroker] Re: Amibroker vs. other software
> > > To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > 
> > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Fred" wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > LOL ... Anyone can make performance stats say whatever 
> > they 
> > > > want ... 
> > > > > Unless you've seen some vendors audited brokerage 
> > statement 
> > > > you 
> > > > can 
> > > > > take them with a grain of salt ... If you are looking for 
> > an 
> > > > out 
> > > > of 
> > > > > the box solution that makes money, you're dreaming ... As 
> > I 
> > > > asked 
> > > > > before ... If one had the golden goose, why would they 
> > sell it 
> > > > for 
> > > > > $3k, $30k or even $300k ...
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > That's obvious and out of subject: nobody's dreaming here, 
> > > > nobody's 
> > > > asking to buy the Holy Grail.
> > > > 
> > > > It's just that I don't like results like those exposed 
> > coupled 
> > > > with 
> > > > fancy words like "genetic algorithms". You might call it 
> > > > personal 
> > > > preference. By and thanks for the input.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
>




Content-Description: "AVG certification"
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.13.27/517 - Release Date: 11/3/2006