[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[amibroker] Re: Quotes Plus Questions



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

I've been using Quotes Plus for a few years and have found it useful, and the
QuotesPlus plug-in very powerful for importing limited fundamentals into AB, 
and also use the Sector, Industry Grouping of stocks into the AB categories.. 

You can use QuotesPlus or StockPickerPro to do screening and rankings and create
lists that can be imported by AB as watchlists, but there is no current capability for
importing rankings into AB.  There are more fields to use in QP and SPP than AB imports.

I played around with a program that ranked funds and created a csv file of these ranks and 
used a script program to read this file and load the ranking data into the notes area.  This 
was clumsy and not easy to maintain, and I did not finish the work.  

Bob K.


--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Ken Close" <ken45140@xxx> wrote:
>
> Hello:  I am evaluating a trial copy of QP3.  My current and long standing
> sub on TC2005 runs out on 9/3.  I have read Dan Clarks excellent review and
> reasoning why he canceled TC2005 and subscribed to QP3.
>  
> Right now I am somewhat overwhelmed by all of the "parameters" that show up
> in the StockPickerPro.  I am struggling with how to use the filters and view
> controls and the Help files are not the greatest.  But those are not my
> questions.
>  
> I understand from a previous message (which I can not locate at the moment)
> that you can download a lot more parameters (fields??) from QP3 than from
> TC2005.  Can you download and use the various Ranking fields, like EPS Rk,
> RS Rk, Grp Rk.   I am most interested in this and whether one can stick the
> QP3 ranks into Amibroker Explorations.  I am somewhat less interested in
> getting the actual EPS numbers into AB vs the EPS RANK numbers.
>  
> I would appreciate knowing how to do this and if someone could let me know
> it is possible and perhaps point to any past messages on this topic, I would
> be most grateful.
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> Ken
>